Bronze Supporter
- Messages
- 37,245
- Reactions
- 128,499
That sheite just never gets old!
(See what I did there?)
(See what I did there?)
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
it is true...technically speaking!
Shh.. Don't tell them! I remember the shooting in Dayton (right after the El Paso) the guy used an AR pistol and I thought here we go, they're going to chase that one down. Fortunately the buzz about it being a pistol brace didn't last long but odds are it's only a matter of time before they get their chance again.They might as well take them off the nfa list. With the pistol braces we have now I dont even see the point in waiting for a stamp to do a sbr
I thought the same thing!Shh.. Don't tell them! I remember the shooting in Dayton (right after the El Paso) the guy used an AR pistol and I thought here we go, they're going to chase that one down. Fortunately the buzz about it being a pistol brace didn't last long but odds are it's only a matter of time before they get their chance again.
I don't disagree with that, but it seems the Anti side is posturing a lot more frequently and it is in fact getting some terrible stuff passed at the state level. So maybe we need more posturing.
That right there is a sad reality. So many gun owners just don't pay any attention to what's going on and often just don't seem to care. Many of them only care after some new law goes in that finally effects them. Then often it's long after the law passed and they are mad. The latest law here is a great example. I am sure weekly people walk in to buy a 10/22 only to find it's an assault weapon now with new restrictions. When they hear this it will be the first they ever heard of it.I'd wager that most non gun owners don't even know what an SBR is nor what the NFA entails and therefore it's a moot topic.
Absolutely right. The antis propose a ban we counter propose with lifting a ban or restriction. Every time!.I don't disagree with that, but it seems the Anti side is posturing a lot more frequently and it is in fact getting some terrible stuff passed at the state level. So maybe we need more posturing.
thats why we need suppressors off too so those with sensitive ears or whom identify as hard of hearing are accounted for...PC culture and all...cant exclude anyone. everyones a winnerAlso, it makes them extra-loud so people at a greater distance would be forewarned.
Yes. But the realist also looks at the posturing and HPA that was put forth and then shelved.Pessimism never won anything...
It'll end up right next to the Hear Protection Act.
Pessimism gives you a sense of reality, but it must be tempered with optimism or you'll descend into defeatism.
Optimism? In the government? What evidence is there to have any optimism in the government?
Very little, but without a little self-delusion, the only thing left is accepting defeat without even trying to resist.