Silver Lifetime
- Messages
- 247
- Reactions
- 368
I've bought both within the last year. I rationalized that the cost savings shooting 22LR vs 9mm, would pay for itself after a couple range days.
The Ruger is a 'nicer', accurate, more solid feeling gun. However, I personally have more fun shooting the Taurus.
I have had a few failure to feed issues with the Taurus, none with the Ruger.
One thing I haven't seen mentioned is the difference in price point. I paid $250 for the Taurus, about twice that for the Mark IV 22/45 Tactical. It's something I like to consider when comparing the bang for the buck (literally).
I don't think you can go wrong with either.
The Ruger is a 'nicer', accurate, more solid feeling gun. However, I personally have more fun shooting the Taurus.
I have had a few failure to feed issues with the Taurus, none with the Ruger.
One thing I haven't seen mentioned is the difference in price point. I paid $250 for the Taurus, about twice that for the Mark IV 22/45 Tactical. It's something I like to consider when comparing the bang for the buck (literally).
I don't think you can go wrong with either.