Bronze Supporter
- Messages
- 5,464
- Reactions
- 13,279
I will probably sell a gun before I buy any but I'm still watching with a lot of interest.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This is MY question as well. Does this mean the Gov can sign it into law if she/he/it simply agrees with section 24 as an 'emergency'? (kinda like SB 914)Section 24 emergency declared. Doesn't that mean that the people can't bring it up for a vote of and by the people.
The only reason they're doing that is because the permit system isn't ready and isn't in place. Don't think for a second that it has anything to do with being benevolent. It's a federal judge's ruling.The reprieve from the permit to purchase until 2026 seems like a positive change. Since the mag ban will be immediate that will limit what firearms will be available to buy. Dealers may have to strip mags out of firearm packages or just not sell those packages to Oregon. It won't be business as usual even with the temporary reprieve from permit to purchase requirement. I would take that into consideration when prioritizing firearm purchases.
"Don't think for a second that it has anything to do with being benevolent..."The only reason they're doing that is because the permit system isn't ready and isn't in place. Don't think for a second that it has anything to do with being benevolent. It's a federal judge's ruling.
For the mag ban, yes, they will do just like other ban states are doing.
Make Oregon just as unattractive place to live, move to, or to do any business for gun owners and FFLs; as CA, NY, Illinois, CT, MA, etc.300 million guns, give or take already in the market. So...what is this supposed to do, again?
Where are they going after black powder rifles? I don't see it but have just skimmed it. Antique firearm and firearm definitions appear to be the same as before from what I saw.Now they're going after black powder rifles? That will save us... Are antique, pre 1899 guns still exempt?
A valid permit to purchase a firearm issued under ORS 166.505 is not required for aWhere are they going after black powder rifles? I don't see it but have just skimmed it. Antique firearm and firearm definitions appear to be the same as before from what I saw.
I believe the class will be required after the 2026 deadline for purchases of exempted firearms through the 2028 deadline.A valid permit to purchase a firearm issued under ORS 166.505 is not required for a
firearm purchase from a gun dealer under this section if:
(a) The purchaser can demonstrate proof of completion of a firearm safety course as
defined in ORS 166.505 (8) and is purchasing:
(A) A single-shot rifle, whether centerfire or rimfire;
(B) A double-barreled shotgun;
(C) A repeating rifle, whether centerfire or rimfire, that has a bolt, lever, pump,
straight-pull or revolving action;
(D) A rifle with an attached tubular magazine designed to accept, and capable of operat-
ing only with, 0.22 caliber rimfire ammunition;
(E) A muzzleloader rifle; or
(F) A shotgun with a pump, break, lever or revolving action; or
From my understanding, you'll need to do the approved firearms training, and then in 2028, you'll need the permit as well.
It could be argued that muzzleloders are considered antique firearms and therefore exempted but ORS 166.210 could mean that modern versions of muzzleloaders are not exempted. That would make this law worse than I had thought it was.A valid permit to purchase a firearm issued under ORS 166.505 is not required for a
firearm purchase from a gun dealer under this section if:
(a) The purchaser can demonstrate proof of completion of a firearm safety course as
defined in ORS 166.505 (8) and is purchasing:
(A) A single-shot rifle, whether centerfire or rimfire;
(B) A double-barreled shotgun;
(C) A repeating rifle, whether centerfire or rimfire, that has a bolt, lever, pump,
straight-pull or revolving action;
(D) A rifle with an attached tubular magazine designed to accept, and capable of operat-
ing only with, 0.22 caliber rimfire ammunition;
(E) A muzzleloader rifle; or
(F) A shotgun with a pump, break, lever or revolving action; or
From my understanding, you'll need to do the approved firearms training, and then in 2028, you'll need the permit as well.
Good catch on that language.A valid permit to purchase a firearm issued under ORS 166.505 is not required for a
firearm purchase from a gun dealer under this section if:
(a) The purchaser can demonstrate proof of completion of a firearm safety course as
defined in ORS 166.505 (8) and is purchasing:
(A) A single-shot rifle, whether centerfire or rimfire;
(B) A double-barreled shotgun;
(C) A repeating rifle, whether centerfire or rimfire, that has a bolt, lever, pump,
straight-pull or revolving action;
(D) A rifle with an attached tubular magazine designed to accept, and capable of operat-
ing only with, 0.22 caliber rimfire ammunition;
(E) A muzzleloader rifle; or
(F) A shotgun with a pump, break, lever or revolving action; or
From my understanding, you'll need to do the approved firearms training, and then in 2028, you'll need the permit as well.
I am going to say stock up on muzzleloaders too. Who knows how retailers will interpret this language.Interesting that is specifies rifles. Bp pistols will not require the training and permit down the road.
This is pretty much how I see it. They want to make gun owners so repulsed to live here they just move somewhere else and simultaneously turn away any gun owners who might want to move here.Make Oregon just as unattractive place to live, move to, or to do any business for gun owners and FFLs; as CA, NY, Illinois, CT, MA, etc.
Wait until they learn that handguns are actually often times harder to put rounds on target, at defense distances, with reasonable accuracy than rifles or pistol caliber carbines (the evil guns)...particularly for untrained individuals. Safer, right?A valid permit to purchase a firearm issued under ORS 166.505 is not required for a
firearm purchase from a gun dealer under this section if:
(a) The purchaser can demonstrate proof of completion of a firearm safety course as
defined in ORS 166.505 (8) and is purchasing:
(A) A single-shot rifle, whether centerfire or rimfire;
(B) A double-barreled shotgun;
(C) A repeating rifle, whether centerfire or rimfire, that has a bolt, lever, pump,
straight-pull or revolving action;
(D) A rifle with an attached tubular magazine designed to accept, and capable of operat-
ing only with, 0.22 caliber rimfire ammunition;
(E) A muzzleloader rifle; or
(F) A shotgun with a pump, break, lever or revolving action; or
From my understanding, you'll need to do the approved firearms training, and then in 2028, you'll need the permit as well.
Maybe the muzzleloaders they are referring to in (E), are the smokless powder muzzleloaders. Many of them are built on serialized actions.A valid permit to purchase a firearm issued under ORS 166.505 is not required for a
firearm purchase from a gun dealer under this section if:
(a) The purchaser can demonstrate proof of completion of a firearm safety course as
defined in ORS 166.505 (8) and is purchasing:
(A) A single-shot rifle, whether centerfire or rimfire;
(B) A double-barreled shotgun;
(C) A repeating rifle, whether centerfire or rimfire, that has a bolt, lever, pump,
straight-pull or revolving action;
(D) A rifle with an attached tubular magazine designed to accept, and capable of operat-
ing only with, 0.22 caliber rimfire ammunition;
(E) A muzzleloader rifle; or
(F) A shotgun with a pump, break, lever or revolving action; or
From my understanding, you'll need to do the approved firearms training, and then in 2028, you'll need the permit as well.
Does the Bad Bull Muzzleloader have to be shipped to an FFL Dealer? |
There are two ways to get your Bad Bull. We can ship anywhere in the U.S. to an FFL Dealer and you may pick it up there. All we need is a fax copy of the FFL. The other method is to come to our location and fill out the ATF form 4473 |