JavaScript is disabled
Our website requires JavaScript to function properly. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser settings before proceeding.
Section 24 emergency declared. Doesn't that mean that the people can't bring it up for a vote of and by the people.
This is MY question as well. Does this mean the Gov can sign it into law if she/he/it simply agrees with section 24 as an 'emergency'? (kinda like SB 914)

SECTION 24. This 2025 Act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the publicpeace, health and safety, an emergency is declared to exist, and this 2025 Act takes effecton its passage.
 
Last Edited:
This is how I see HB 3075 playing out with retailers. It will pass this session, that is all but guaranteed. It could be after the legislative session has ended, before we get a decision back from the Appellate Court. Cautious retailers who are paying attention will note the retroactive mag ban in HB 3075 and at minimum stop shipping 11+ mags to Oregon. Cautious and lazy retailers will just write Oregon off completely, because it's easier.

Perhaps if down the road the Appelate Court or State Supreme Court gets rid of Measure 114 and HB 3075 entirely, online retailers will start shipping to us again.

As for local retailers they tend to pay a little closer attention to what's going on. They may continue selling until the decision comes back from the Appellate Court or they may just take the safer path and stop selling once HB 3075 is signed by the Governor.

I don't think it's clear to many whether HB 3075 will go away if Appellate Court knocks out M114 for good or if it will act as stand alone legislation. It may be that HB 3075 will have to be challenged separately?

Another possibility with M114 decision is that they rule against the permit to purchase portion of the law but allow the mag ban to be enacted. Combined with HB 3075 that would still subject us to retroactive mag ban.

Could the Apellate Court allow the M114 mag ban to be enacted but rule against the retroactive ban in HB 3075 in the same decision? That seems unlikely since HB 3075 isn't part of the lawsuit.

So many possibilities but it's almost a certainty that retailers will start cutting us off to one degree or another once HB 3075 is signed.
 
The reprieve from the permit to purchase until 2026 seems like a positive change. Since the mag ban will be immediate that will limit what firearms will be available to buy. Dealers may have to strip mags out of firearm packages or just not sell those packages to Oregon. It won't be business as usual even with the temporary reprieve from permit to purchase requirement. I would take that into consideration when prioritizing firearm purchases.
 
The reprieve from the permit to purchase until 2026 seems like a positive change. Since the mag ban will be immediate that will limit what firearms will be available to buy. Dealers may have to strip mags out of firearm packages or just not sell those packages to Oregon. It won't be business as usual even with the temporary reprieve from permit to purchase requirement. I would take that into consideration when prioritizing firearm purchases.
The only reason they're doing that is because the permit system isn't ready and isn't in place. Don't think for a second that it has anything to do with being benevolent. It's a federal judge's ruling.

For the mag ban, yes, they will do just like other ban states are doing.
 
The only reason they're doing that is because the permit system isn't ready and isn't in place. Don't think for a second that it has anything to do with being benevolent. It's a federal judge's ruling.

For the mag ban, yes, they will do just like other ban states are doing.
"Don't think for a second that it has anything to do with being benevolent..."

I agree. I am trying to make a point that a buyer shouldn't wait for the M114 decision before buying a firearm that they want to come with 11+ capacity mags. A buyer may be thinking that if M114 is implemented and HB 3075 is passed that they will have until 2026 to sneak in last minute purchases. That is true except that 11+ mags will be banned immediately. That will severely limit the selection of firearms that can be purchased up through the 2026 deadline.
 
Last Edited:
Where are they going after black powder rifles? I don't see it but have just skimmed it. Antique firearm and firearm definitions appear to be the same as before from what I saw.
A valid permit to purchase a firearm issued under ORS 166.505 is not required for a
firearm purchase from a gun dealer under this section if:
(a) The purchaser can demonstrate proof of completion of a firearm safety course as
defined in ORS 166.505 (8) and is purchasing:
(A) A single-shot rifle, whether centerfire or rimfire;
(B) A double-barreled shotgun;
(C) A repeating rifle, whether centerfire or rimfire, that has a bolt, lever, pump,
straight-pull or revolving action;
(D) A rifle with an attached tubular magazine designed to accept, and capable of operat-
ing only with, 0.22 caliber rimfire ammunition;
(E) A muzzleloader rifle; or
(F) A shotgun with a pump, break, lever or revolving action; or

From my understanding, you'll need to do the approved firearms training, and then in 2028, you'll need the permit as well.
 
A valid permit to purchase a firearm issued under ORS 166.505 is not required for a
firearm purchase from a gun dealer under this section if:
(a) The purchaser can demonstrate proof of completion of a firearm safety course as
defined in ORS 166.505 (8) and is purchasing:
(A) A single-shot rifle, whether centerfire or rimfire;
(B) A double-barreled shotgun;
(C) A repeating rifle, whether centerfire or rimfire, that has a bolt, lever, pump,
straight-pull or revolving action;
(D) A rifle with an attached tubular magazine designed to accept, and capable of operat-
ing only with, 0.22 caliber rimfire ammunition;
(E) A muzzleloader rifle; or
(F) A shotgun with a pump, break, lever or revolving action; or

From my understanding, you'll need to do the approved firearms training, and then in 2028, you'll need the permit as well.
I believe the class will be required after the 2026 deadline for purchases of exempted firearms through the 2028 deadline.

That is interesting about muzzleloaders being included in that list.
 
A valid permit to purchase a firearm issued under ORS 166.505 is not required for a
firearm purchase from a gun dealer under this section if:
(a) The purchaser can demonstrate proof of completion of a firearm safety course as
defined in ORS 166.505 (8) and is purchasing:
(A) A single-shot rifle, whether centerfire or rimfire;
(B) A double-barreled shotgun;
(C) A repeating rifle, whether centerfire or rimfire, that has a bolt, lever, pump,
straight-pull or revolving action;
(D) A rifle with an attached tubular magazine designed to accept, and capable of operat-
ing only with, 0.22 caliber rimfire ammunition;
(E) A muzzleloader rifle; or
(F) A shotgun with a pump, break, lever or revolving action; or

From my understanding, you'll need to do the approved firearms training, and then in 2028, you'll need the permit as well.
It could be argued that muzzleloders are considered antique firearms and therefore exempted but ORS 166.210 could mean that modern versions of muzzleloaders are not exempted. That would make this law worse than I had thought it was.

 
A valid permit to purchase a firearm issued under ORS 166.505 is not required for a
firearm purchase from a gun dealer under this section if:
(a) The purchaser can demonstrate proof of completion of a firearm safety course as
defined in ORS 166.505 (8) and is purchasing:
(A) A single-shot rifle, whether centerfire or rimfire;
(B) A double-barreled shotgun;
(C) A repeating rifle, whether centerfire or rimfire, that has a bolt, lever, pump,
straight-pull or revolving action;
(D) A rifle with an attached tubular magazine designed to accept, and capable of operat-
ing only with, 0.22 caliber rimfire ammunition;
(E) A muzzleloader rifle; or
(F) A shotgun with a pump, break, lever or revolving action; or

From my understanding, you'll need to do the approved firearms training, and then in 2028, you'll need the permit as well.
Good catch on that language.
 
Make Oregon just as unattractive place to live, move to, or to do any business for gun owners and FFLs; as CA, NY, Illinois, CT, MA, etc.
This is pretty much how I see it. They want to make gun owners so repulsed to live here they just move somewhere else and simultaneously turn away any gun owners who might want to move here.
Frankly, I'm convinced the left knows deep down that the vast majority of gun owners are NOT a danger or threat to society...they just have a political bone to pick and want to be surrounded by only likeminded friends. Typical intolerance on their end. "We love everyone" ...."that thinks like we do"
 
A valid permit to purchase a firearm issued under ORS 166.505 is not required for a
firearm purchase from a gun dealer under this section if:
(a) The purchaser can demonstrate proof of completion of a firearm safety course as
defined in ORS 166.505 (8) and is purchasing:
(A) A single-shot rifle, whether centerfire or rimfire;
(B) A double-barreled shotgun;
(C) A repeating rifle, whether centerfire or rimfire, that has a bolt, lever, pump,
straight-pull or revolving action;
(D) A rifle with an attached tubular magazine designed to accept, and capable of operat-
ing only with, 0.22 caliber rimfire ammunition;
(E) A muzzleloader rifle; or
(F) A shotgun with a pump, break, lever or revolving action; or

From my understanding, you'll need to do the approved firearms training, and then in 2028, you'll need the permit as well.
Wait until they learn that handguns are actually often times harder to put rounds on target, at defense distances, with reasonable accuracy than rifles or pistol caliber carbines (the evil guns)...particularly for untrained individuals. Safer, right?

It would take someone who actually had experience handling and shooting various firearms to know this kind of thing. The people who craft these bills have next to no knowledge about what they are dealing with. If they'd put aside their fear and hatred for a minute to learn, they might learn a thing or two
 
A valid permit to purchase a firearm issued under ORS 166.505 is not required for a
firearm purchase from a gun dealer under this section if:
(a) The purchaser can demonstrate proof of completion of a firearm safety course as
defined in ORS 166.505 (8) and is purchasing:
(A) A single-shot rifle, whether centerfire or rimfire;
(B) A double-barreled shotgun;
(C) A repeating rifle, whether centerfire or rimfire, that has a bolt, lever, pump,
straight-pull or revolving action;
(D) A rifle with an attached tubular magazine designed to accept, and capable of operat-
ing only with, 0.22 caliber rimfire ammunition;
(E) A muzzleloader rifle; or
(F) A shotgun with a pump, break, lever or revolving action; or

From my understanding, you'll need to do the approved firearms training, and then in 2028, you'll need the permit as well.
Maybe the muzzleloaders they are referring to in (E), are the smokless powder muzzleloaders. Many of them are built on serialized actions.





Does the Bad Bull Muzzleloader have to be shipped to an FFL Dealer?
There are two ways to get your Bad Bull. We can ship anywhere in the U.S. to an FFL Dealer and you may pick it up there. All we need is a fax copy of the FFL. The other method is to come to our location and fill out the ATF form 4473
 

Upcoming Events

Roseburg Rod and Gun Club Gun Show
  • Roseburg, OR
Redmond Gun Show
  • Redmond, OR

New Classified Ads

Back Top