Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Straight pull AR15s rule!!!There appear to be some firearms exempted from permit to purchase requirements that didn't exist in m114.
(15) A valid permit to purchase a firearm issued under ORS 166.505 is not required for a
firearm purchase from a gun dealer under this section if:
(a) The purchaser can demonstrate proof of completion of a firearm safety course as
defined in ORS 166.505 (8) and is purchasing:
(A) A single-shot rifle, whether centerfire or rimfire;
(B) A double-barreled shotgun;
(C) A repeating rifle, whether centerfire or rimfire, that has a bolt, lever, pump,
straight-pull or revolving action;
(D) A rifle with an attached tubular magazine designed to accept, and capable of operat-
ing only with, 0.22 caliber rimfire ammunition;
(E) A muzzleloader rifle; or
(F) A shotgun with a pump, break, lever or revolving action; or
But proof of training completion is still required, and more importantly, those exemptions go away in 2028:There appear to be some firearms exempted from permit to purchase requirements that didn't exist in m114.
(15) A valid permit to purchase a firearm issued under ORS 166.505 is not required for a
firearm purchase from a gun dealer under this section if:
(a) The purchaser can demonstrate proof of completion of a firearm safety course as
defined in ORS 166.505 (8) and is purchasing:
(A) A single-shot rifle, whether centerfire or rimfire;
(B) A double-barreled shotgun;
(C) A repeating rifle, whether centerfire or rimfire, that has a bolt, lever, pump,
straight-pull or revolving action;
(D) A rifle with an attached tubular magazine designed to accept, and capable of operat-
ing only with, 0.22 caliber rimfire ammunition;
(E) A muzzleloader rifle; or
(F) A shotgun with a pump, break, lever or revolving action; or
"(Italics = removed/omitted)"But proof of training completion is still required, and more importantly, those exemptions go away in 2028:
View attachment 2018907
...
View attachment 2018908
(Italics = removed/omitted)
Active mil and popo are the only exemptions left after July 1st 2028.
Staggering the effective dates is a sneaky move - obviously it softens the landing of the new restrictions. A lot of buyers will only get hit with the training requirement and think, "meh, that wasn't so bad." Or people who might have bought an AR for HD go for a pump shotgun instead to skip the permit process, and that may be the only gun they ever buy.
Then after everyone gets used to the new rules and the grumbling dies down, here comes the next phase.
But the shift from a blacklist to a whitelist is interesting too. Lists of "banned" (or in this case, permit required) firearms and features will always be a game of whack-a-mole with creative manufacturers. Pivoting from "here's a massive list of the things you can't buy" to "here's a very short list of the things you can buy (and we're certainly never going to update it as technology advances)" certainly seems like a more efficient way for them to achieve their goals. I wouldn't be surprised to see this kind of language pop up in more legislation, and it'll be interesting to see how it holds up to legal challenges.
In the meantime, who's got a lead on a .308 gattling gun? I've got 3 years to save up for it.
View attachment 2018950
There are already two threads on this. This is the third. M114 and "gut and stuff" are the other 2. @Moderators thread merge? Other threads:
Actually it's a replacement for m114. Same battleFeel like this one should have its own thread, entirely new battle.
I agree. The Apellate Court may just let M114 die, but this will survive and be a new battle.Feel like this one should have its own thread, entirely new battle.
114 was put to a "vote". To replace that doesn't it have to be a ballot measure?I agree. The Apellate Court may just let M114 die, but this will survive and be a new battle.
Not sure about that? It appears they are attempting to pass their own version borrowing language from M114. I guess we won't know for sure until we hear from the Appellate Court or they pass HB 3075.114 was put to a "vote". To replace that doesn't it have to be a ballot measure?
Don't think so, they (Legislature) can "fix" BMs and pass/kill depending on who/what. SB 348 was the Senate version last time around and it died in committee114 was put to a "vote". To replace that doesn't it have to be a ballot measure?
No remember NO DRIVER LICENSE FOR UNDOCUMENTED. We the people passed that by almost 75%. Brown over rode that and put a EMERGENCY clause on it so we could not vote on it again.114 was put to a "vote". To replace that doesn't it have to be a ballot measure?