Gun owners sell back guns, feels I-594 'too vague'

Discussion in 'Legal & Political Archive' started by 223to45, Feb 23, 2015.

  1. 223to45

    223to45
    Whatcom
    Active Member

    Messages:
    139
    Likes Received:
    99
  2. Slobray

    Slobray
    Yelm, WA
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,132
    Likes Received:
    2,677

    This has to be fake. It's hard to beleive that this so called "gun collector" would sell his guns because...



    Why if you're a collector would your guns be transfered to "someone who shouldn't have a firearm", especially if they are your "prized possessions"? Unless he fears letting that somone hold one of his guns breaks the law.


    I'm also not so sure about...

    Why would I594 have anything to do with the number of "permits" (assuming he means CPL) issued last year?


    This whole article makes no sense.


    Ray
     
    Last edited: Feb 24, 2015
    Stomper, BoonDocks36 and Dyjital like this.
  3. The Heretic

    The Heretic
    Oregon
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    6,371
    Likes Received:
    10,330
    Gun permits? o_O
     
    ZigZagZeke likes this.
  4. slimer13

    slimer13
    Deer Park
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,042
    Likes Received:
    3,913
    Makes sense if you read between the lines and look past the weak reporting.

    Normally people who would sell a gun to free up some cash would do so in private ftf transfers to get top dollar. Now they don't want to deal with the hassle so they run it to their lgs and be done with it. That is why there is an increase in guys selling guns to shops.
     
    ZigZagZeke and Slobray like this.
  5. bakersman345

    bakersman345
    Camas wa
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    709
    Likes Received:
    544
    Its just lazy to sell your stuff to lgs, post it meet at ffl pay 20 bucks all done.
    -- or ignore the law and cross your fingers.
     

Share This Page