GREAT NEWS! 9th Court of Appeals rules Hawaii "shall issue"

[Brutus57]

Caught just a brief glance of an article on the web about this which is pretty amazing since Hawaii is pretty liberal but so's the 9th Circuit...it's almost like they sense a big wave headed back their way and they are backpedaling to get in line with the 2A. I am sure there are a ton of Libs that burst an artery over this ruling.

http://www.google.com/search?client=safari&rls=en&q=hawaii+shall+issue&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8

Brutus Out

Read More

 

[GrpCapMandrake]

It will be interesting to see where Hawaii will go with this. Have yet to see a State just give up short of going to the SCOTUS.

There has been an interesting and unexpected shift from the 9th Circuit as of late.

 

[oknow]

Just till the election is over ( if there is one )

 

[Dayu]

John Marshall has made his decision. Now let him enforce it.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Worcester_v._Georgia#Jackson.27s_response

In other words, "so what?" Watch Hawaii give the 9th the social finger on the issue. It's not like the Justice Department is going to start sending in Federal Marshals to enforce the ruling.

 

[GrpCapMandrake]

They may well try to ignore the ruling, while appealing to SCOTUS, or put up other roadblocks to make the process of getting a permit onerous and time consuming. However they cannot do nothing at all...

 

[Stomper]

They may well try to ignore the ruling, while appealing to SCOTUS, or put up other roadblocks to make the process of getting a permit onerous and time consuming. However they cannot do nothing at all...

Given the current batch of progressives sitting in executive government positions, and the NUMEROUS examples of blatant refusals to enforce laws on the books and/or observe current constitutional amendments that don't fit their "utopia" visions, would you bet the farm on that?

I sure wouldn't.

 

[GrpCapMandrake]

Given the current batch of progressives sitting in executive government positions, and the NUMEROUS examples of blatant refusals to enforce laws on the books and/or observe current constitutional amendments that don't fit their "utopia" visions, would you bet the farm on that?

I sure wouldn't.

No probably not, but I am trying out this whole optimism thing. At the very least I am figuring Hawaii will do something similar to what D.C. did after they lost their fight at the SCOTUS.

 

[8ball]

This ruling is great, but not exactly unexpected, since it's from the same panel of 3 judges which heard Peruta.

It will still revert if Peruta is heard en-banc by the full panel of judges, which is very likely to happen later this year. I doubt Hawaii will lift a finger until that situation is resolved.