Washington Gottlieb, NRA sue I-1639 separately!!

[Dave Workman]

Gottlieb, NRA File Separate Challenges to I-1639 Validity

Nationally-recognized gun rights leader Alan Gottlieb, who heads two Washington State-based gun rights groups, on Friday filed one of two legal challenges to Initiative 1639, the latest gun control measure backed by a Seattle-based lobbying group

Gottlieb, NRA File Separate Challenges to I-1639 Validity - Liberty Park Press

Read More

 

[Fast Eddie]

Next paycheck I'm sending that guy some money.

 

[Dave Workman]

Next paycheck I'm sending that guy some money.

SAF is certainly going to need it.
SAF will likely sue King County. SAF is already suing Seattle, along with the NRA, to protect state preemption.

 

[Lilhigbee]

Just got a lifetime membership to SAF. Long overdue!!

 

[nammac]

Good news for our northern brethren!

Support these organizations as you are able, they all need our support.

 

[ar addict]

I am already a lifetime member, so I just went and made a donation.
Keep up the good work, and let me know if I can help in any way.

 

[bentoncity]

Personally, I'd like to read the SAF & NRA briefs filed. Perhaps either of them would provide me with more information I could pass along to the 'un-educated'. I'm guessing the courts don't have the briefs uploaded yet as I'm unable to find them on their website. Keep spreading the news Dave, I appreciate it.

Dan

 

[Boss]

My local paper is reporting this morning that the Sec. of State certified the ballot measure and it has qualified for the November ballot.

Time to seriously get things in gear, spread the word, educate voters, etc.

BOSS

 

[Boss]

Official press release (on a Friday of course):

News Release - Office - WA Secretary of State

You can read for yourself. The release claims petitions meet the requirements under the RCW's.

Um, RCW 29A.72.120 requires a "full, true, and correct copy" of the initiative is printed on the reverse of the petition. If requisite strikeouts and underlines were not present, then the initiative copies were not 'full, true, and correct."

Law lays out simple, basic requirements, which factually were not met.

This isn't even complicated and is setting a very bad precedent.​

BOSS