Staff Member
Platinum Supporter
- Messages
- 9,665
- Reactions
- 15,315
That maybe the regulations play a part in that imbalance?Two handguns, seventeen rifles.
What do YOU think?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That maybe the regulations play a part in that imbalance?Two handguns, seventeen rifles.
What do YOU think?
That maybe the regulations play a part in that imbalance?
Nope.
Just a PITA policy in my county by the Chief constable three chiefs ago, an avid gun-hater [very odd in a rural county of farms and pheasant-rearing, that] who decided that six guns was okay, ten is a few too many, fifteen is ludicrous and any more is to be discouraged, no matter that they were already in full legal possession of the current owner. So if I want any more, it's a one-for-one deal.
Next county over there is no such constraint and it seems that provided that you comply with the security requirements - ie, that YOU are wholly responsible for the security of your firearms [as, indeed, do I], you can have as many as you feel like.
Indeed!
And a shout-out to Laura San Giacomo...
For me, the handguns do it. Lacking a .30 cal and .41 cal, but up to .45 cal I've got it covered. Oldest son has the .50's covered, so I've got access to a .500 S&W and .50 AE.