Few guns you "can't" buy in Kommiofnia !!

[ARFrog]

Well to be honest, we're not exactly the crowd who spends weeks on end at the stupid protests. We are (mostly) adults and have jobs and families and don't have the time or inclination for silly things like stomping our feet and setting things on fire. We basically state our opinions about various things and move along with our day. Most of us are good with the tired slogans...for now. We have our get together's which mainly consist of shooting lane clean ups in the various State and National forests around here. But as a group we find it somewhat lifting to pass around the slogans. It builds solidarity and morale amongst us law abiding. You should check out our "not enough goofy humor" section.
Anyway, welcome to the forum! Nice to have an insider from CA. Your insight is indeed valuable to us frogs who are sitting in the boiling pot.

Sounds like you aren't that different from myself and many others in the golden state. What I have observed is the fact that while we are busy working, taking care of our families and abiding by the law, others are taking advantage of our preoccupation. Couple that with distance from our seats of government and a media whose world view leans towards the protestors and the assault politicians and we are at a distinct disadvantage.

Our CA pot has been boiling for sometime and may be irredeemable. Your pot is just beginning to warm and needs your diligence and concerted action.

Good luck,

ARFrog

 

[WoodsPlinker]

Thank you for the info, I will pass it along to my friends in California.

 

[HB of CJ]

Silly me. And here I thought it was a list of civil or criminal offences that would prohibit illegal aliens from hopping fences.

 

[GWS]

Firearm manufacturers look at their sales numbers and decide when its no longer profitable to pay the California grift and so, guns drop off the roster. New semi-autos are automatically disqualified from the "Safe" gun roster because they don't have "micro-stamping" (A real-sounding, but non-existent technology) The California Supreme Court ruled that the ban is legal and here is their reasoning:
(I pinched this from the Government Technology (GT) site)

"Impossibility can occasionally excuse noncompliance with a statute," Justice Goodwin Liu said, since a manufacturer charged with violating the law could argue that it had done everything possible to comply. "But impossibility does not authorize a court to go beyond interpreting a statute and simply invalidate it."

So we can expect laws requiring cotton candy bullets sometime soon.

 

[tkdguy]

How how sad and funny these people are so mental.