JavaScript is disabled
Our website requires JavaScript to function properly. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser settings before proceeding.
Messages
7,315
Reactions
23,250
How do you see this?

'' Those engaged in the business of dealing in firearms who utilize the internet or other technologies must obtain a license,''

Like a brick and mortar store!

So using this and other sites to post adds in now illegal?

I took this ''New actions list'' from another post.
If it's legitimate. And I read this in context. It looks like one gun sale constitutes being in the business of dealing firearms.

Glad I like my guns. Looks like I can't sell them. :s0099: I can't advertise any longer.
And he's adding hundreds of new agents to enforce these new controls.


And this was taken from the White house fact sheet.
  • Clarify that it doesn't matter where you conduct your business—from a store, at gun shows, or over the Internet: If you're in the business of selling firearms, you must get a license and conduct background checks. Background checks have been shown to keep guns out of the wrong hands, but too many gun sales—particularly online and at gun shows—occur without basic background checks. Today, the Administration took action to ensure that anyone who is "engaged in the business" of selling firearms is licensed and conducts background checks on their customers. Consistent with court rulings on this issue, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) has clarified the following principles:
    • A person can be engaged in the business of dealing in firearms regardless of the location in which firearm transactions are conducted. For example, a person can be engaged in the business of dealing in firearms even if the person only conducts firearm transactions at gun shows or through the Internet. Those engaged in the business of dealing in firearms who utilize the Internet or other technologies must obtain a license, just as a dealer whose business is run out of a traditional brick-and-mortar store.
    • Quantity and frequency of sales are relevant indicators. There is no specific threshold number of firearms purchased or sold that triggers the licensure requirement. But it is important to note that even a few transactions, when combined with other evidence, can be sufficient to establish that a person is "engaged in the business." For example, courts have upheld convictions for dealing without a license when as few as two firearms were sold or when only one or two transactions took place, when other factors also were present.
    • There are criminal penalties for failing to comply with these requirements. A person who willfully engages in the business of dealing in firearms without the required license is subject to criminal prosecution and can be sentenced up to five years in prison and fined up to $250,000. Dealers are also subject to penalties for failing to conduct background checks before completing a sale.


CX6c6IhW8AAmrT8.jpg

CX6c6IhW8AAmrT8.jpg
 
Last Edited:
The gray area here is the definition of "in the business". How many guns is that? DO you have to make a profit? The ATF rules already exclude private sellers who sell maybe several times a year and aren't in it to make a profit. As far as I know, that hasn't changed. But I wouldn't be surprised to see that particular rule 'tweaked' at some point in the future.

My argument would be, if they want to do that, then the ATF needs to open up the 01 FFL to private sellers and not just to businesses. I don't expect that is going to happen, but it would have to be the logical response if they classify private sellers as "in the business".
 
Still not clear. Specifically it says even one gun sold over the internet makes you a seller. But if you're shipping it to a receiving FFL, how or why could that require the seller to be a dealer? Once the receiving FFL does the transfer, the background check will be done on the buyer.

I am disgusted.

WAYNO.
 
So let's say one of the hundreds of new agents mining the internet, accuses you of being a dealer?

Would you be considered guilty if you made a profit? Or are you guilty just for providing a gun for sale?

Keep in mind. They have lawyers paid for buy your endless tax money. And they can take away years of your life. And all your money.

That's even if you win your case!

But the Obama gang wouldn't do that. They wouldn't demonize you and make an example of you. Would they? :rolleyes:

Scary crap. :s0002:
 
Still not clear. Specifically it says even one gun sold over the internet makes you a seller. But if you're shipping it to a receiving FFL, how or why could that require the seller to be a dealer? Once the receiving FFL does the transfer, the background check will be done on the buyer.

I am disgusted.

WAYNO.
one used gun sold "does make you a seller" but does NOT make you "in the business of selling guns" no more so than you selling your used car without a dealers license!.SELLING A USED CAR DOES NOT MAKE YOU A CAR DEALER
otherwise one could say that a city business license as well as any state resale tax collecting permits that may or may not be required in your sate will be a necessity for the sale of ANY SINGLE ITEM
unless obama wants to change the definition of "in the business"

https://www.atf.gov/file/100871/download
 
Last Edited:
I don't know how the ATF could make getting an FFL so tough for normal people, and then require it on the other hand.

As long as every person-of-the-gun VOTES this November, this unconstitutional crap only lasts for one more year!
 
one used gun sold "does make you a seller" but does NOT make you "in the business of selling guns" no more so than you selling your used car without a dealers license!.SELLING A USED CAR DOES NOT MAKE YOU A CAR DEALER
otherwise one could say that a city business license as well as any state resale tax collecting permits that may or may not be required in your sate will be a necessity for the sale of ANY SINGLE ITEM
unless obama wants to change the definition of "in the business"

https://www.atf.gov/file/100871/download



...For example, courts have upheld convictions for dealing without a license when as few as two firearms were sold or when only one or two transactions took place, when other factors also were present.

WAYNO.
 
Last Edited:
If you're in the business of selling firearms,


It's not a business for me it's a hobbie...

If I'm forced to buy a license then they will be forced to give me a huge tax break for the space in my home that I store them and a tax break for all the money I loose when I sell stuff off.

Crap will backfire on them IMO.

EDIT: Also I will be adding my car mileage and gas to my deductions as well as any time spent on the Internet "researching" guns. As well as my internet bills for the year so that I can "do business". Maybe write off my phones and computers while I'm at it.


Screw them.
 
Last Edited:
99% of what King Hussein said is already on the books and HE knows it.
He was simply taking credit for laws, regs, rules and policies that are already in effect and will have zero effect on how things are currently done.

The main item that can cause concern is the usual "we're adding x number of enforcers" B.S. (in this case 200 more ATF agents) that will actually be Democrat controlled, political, fully indoctrinated, Anti-gun types.
 
EDIT: Also I will be adding my car mileage and gas to my deductions as well as any time spent on the Internet "researching" guns. As well as my internet bills for the year so that I can "do business". Maybe write off my phones and computers while I'm at it..

Bingo.
 
Those engaged in the business of dealing in firearms who utilize the Internet or other technologies must obtain a license

The question is, what does "utilize" mean? If I am a private seller, I might "Utilize" the
internet to list a firearm and to arrange to meet a buyer at a LGS. However, I am NOT selling the gun on the internet. That's being done in person. To me, listing and selling are two very different things.
 
It's not a business for me it's a hobbie...

If I'm forced to buy a license then they will be forced to give me a huge tax break for the space in my home that I store them and a tax break for all the money I loose when I sell stuff off.

Crap will backfire on them IMO.

EDIT: Also I will be adding my car mileage and gas to my deductions as well as any time spent on the Internet "researching" guns. As well as my internet bills for the year so that I can "do business". Maybe write off my phones and computers while I'm at it.


Screw them.


They know you can't just get a license.
Few would qualify. And they hold the approval. So this is not an option and they know that.

But to most folk's this sounds reasonable. So they shrug there shoulders.

I tell you. We have been ham strung!
How bad? That's up to them. And I don't like the Idea of Obama's people deciding that.
I can already see 2/3ds of the tables at gun shows going away?[Well not the jerky];)

We can be monitored down to the single sale on the internet, with enough agents.
And whatever way the existing laws have been enforced? That may not be the way it's ordered to be done from this time forward. Or retroactively if laws were already on the books?

It's up to the administration to decide which laws to enforce. And on what grounds.

I think what we just saw was a shot accost the bow!
And when a person set on hurting you signals his intensions. You should look very hard at just how they can! ;)
 
Last Edited:
The main item that can cause concern is the usual "we're adding x number of enforcers" B.S. (in this case 200 more ATF agents) that will actually be Democrat controlled, political, fully indoctrinated, Anti-gun types.

For now...all the more reason that pro-gun folks, no matter what political affiliation, get out this year and vote pro-gun. Put the ATF back under pro-gun control for a few years and clean things up a bit, start by tossing the current leader.
 
It's one small step for Obama and it will be one giant leap for Hillary in the effort to disarm honest Americans when she buys her way into the oval office.
 
The question is, what does "utilize" mean? If I am a private seller, I might "Utilize" the
internet to list a firearm and to arrange to meet a buyer at a LGS. However, I am NOT selling the gun on the internet. That's being done in person. To me, listing and selling are two very different things.

I'm just playing Devils advocate here. So don't hate me.

You can decide if your putting yourself in a position to get hurt or not?

  • Those engaged in the business of dealing in firearms who utilize the Internet or other technologies must obtain a license, just as a dealer whose business is run out of a traditional brick-and-mortar store.

So you sold a gun through the internet? Big deal.
You made sure the guy had a background check through a local FFL!

Right?

Well never mind who dose the background check.

Did you facilitate the sale of a gun using the internet?
Do you have a license?
When they ask you this in court. What's that lump in your throat gona feel like?

  • There are criminal penalties for failing to comply with these requirements. A person who willfully engages in the business of dealing in firearms without the required license is subject to criminal prosecution and can be sentenced up to five years in prison and fined up to $250,000.


I'm not saying they will come after you.
But I'm afraid they could try to make a case out of it.

Remember. They are evil, vindictive and petty!:rolleyes:
 
Last Edited:

Upcoming Events

Centralia Gun Show
Centralia, WA
Klamath Falls gun show
Klamath Falls, OR
Oregon Arms Collectors April 2024 Gun Show
Portland, OR
Albany Gun Show
Albany, OR

New Resource Reviews

New Classified Ads

Back Top