Well, some OR Sheriffs have already been doing that for some time. I changed the address and renewed my OR CHL without any problem. In fact, the process was quicker that what OR residents had reported in different counties. Called for an appoint about noon and walked out with permit in hand by 9:30 the following morning. Nowhere else has been that easy and quick.
Precisely, Heller established the Second Amendment as an individual right (which we all already knew), McDonald established that the Second Amendment applied to the states under the Fourteenth Amendment, and Bruen, citing both Heller and Mcdonald by name, established that the Second Amendment provides a right to carry outside the home. So if Bruen says that the Second Amendment provides a right to carry and that denying a citizen a carry license was a violation of the Fourteenth Amendment under McDonald than logically it would follow that Oregon would either have to have reciprocity with all 50 states, issue permits to citizens of all 50 states, allow permitless Open Carry to citizens of all 50 states (or atleast states other than itself and the states it currently recognizes concealed carry licenses from), or be constitutional carry. Bruen (unfortunately) does not say the state cannot require a license to carry (but left that door open), but did say that they must actually issue that license, so since the Second Amendment applies to all 50 states under the Fourteenth Amendment than logically Oregon must issue licenses to all 50 states, or allow permitless carry, either concealed or open, I see no other way under Bruen.
Give ol' Alan Gottleib and SAF a little time to crack that block…. It's coming!
Bubblegum communism, and the statist lovin' commies who would subjugate us to it, right in their BUBBLEGUMMING EAR HOLES!
Interesting observation of mine: Belarus is considered to be the last remaining "Communist" state of the former Soviet Union, which is unchanged from the time the USSR dissolved. From what I have read there are few restrictions on gun ownership and usage within the country. I was surprised to discover this. I was also surprised to see that the country is quite beautiful and well maintained. I have one friend from Russia who describes himself as an ardent "Communist'. Yet, when he became a US citizen decades ago he voted for Conservative Republicans. To this day he calls himself a "Communist". He refers to Democrats as being "Nazis".
This. Is. Spot. On. Grow a pair and quit asking the government for permission.
Interestingly, I have a close friend from Germany who describes herself as "anarcho-Commie" but says if for some reason she found herself here in the States and having to stay and build a life here she'd be so MAGA pro-Trump as to make many here look like Cornynite limpwrists--she and a few of her friends actually joked about setting up a troll group "Euro Commies For Trump," for three main reasons:
I disagree. Now that carry outside the home is a recognized right (which it has not been up to now), i think that out of state residents have an equal protection claim against Oregon, and against every other state that dues not have reciprocity.
Once again, that's a case your going to have to take before the district courts, because you will NOT get Oregon to change, and Oregon has every right to set it's own policies on who they will issue permits to, currently I believe it's certain wash residents ONLY and under May issue with Just Cause! Don't blame the messenger, Oregon has and often flaunts its Preemption status, but only when it's convenient! Yes, I agree there should be reciprocity, or better yet, Constitutnal carry, but that's gonna be a long slog to get there, IF!
Oregon lost that right. Did you read the Bruen decision? I'm not saying this happens automatically. But as other posters said, the next step is for a Iowa resident to apply for a carry permit, be denied administratively, and then appeal that decision through the courts. I believe that even the lowest court is now bound to find the prohibition against issuing permits to non residents unconstitutional. The whole country is now shall issue, and that does not go away when you cross state lines, but it will take some time to actually happen in practice.
I have in fact, the one thing you guys are missing here is, within that ruling, it only really applies to the states that are NOT shall issue it also stipulates that the states will be required to implement certain reasonable measures of compliance for all permit applications, such as finger printing, BGC and other "Reasonable" measures that the State decided! Ok, so, Oregon along with most of the rest of the states are shall issue or the few who have constitutnal carry with out permit, cool! The issue here is, Oregon, as well as the rest of the states who already have shall issue, don't need to do anything else, the ruling doesn't actually cover interstate carry or reciprocity, only that the few states MUST change to Shall Issue! It dosnt mandate or even imply that states must accept other states permits, or Constitutnal Carry! Yes, I agree that's wrong and Oregon and the rest of the states MUST ether adopt one system or the other, But, you will NOT force Oregon or any other state to accept it with out the SCOTUS backing it up, which we might get later, or not! I'm not disagreeing with you guys, I'm pointing out how this ruling will effect Oregon, or likely not! State legislators, that's a dead end, Attorney General, Good Luck with that, Current Gov'ness, not happening, States court, maybe, mostly likely NOT!
With respect to OR, only those who do not reside in WA, ID, NV and CA because there are OR sheriffs who will issue CHLs to residents of WA, ID, NV and CA.
This I can generally agree with. Nonetheless, the important part here is not which state was told to do what, or how a specific law is affected. The important part is that the court unambiguously recognized an individual right to carry a firearm for protection outside the home and this applies to all states. Furthermore, and maybe even more importantly, the Supremes clarified the what analysis lower courts must use in analyzing all Second Amendment cases (not just pertaining to carry).
What's the distinction between open and conceal carry? I'm not following
Oregon Allows open carry, and yet, restricts it!
In most States, Open is fully legal, as in not concealed, doesn't require permits/licenses, and applies also to rifles. In some States, Open Carry is restricted to conceal permit/license holders, and further restricted (must be unloaded, actions open, things like that) in some cities.
