The last time I visited Oregon was 2019 for my Sister's wedding, approaching that I explored ways of legally working around Oregon's, Multnomah County's, and Portland's communist antigun laws to allow me to carry at least SOMETHING, I even explored carrying a cap and ball revolver. Well the result of that, though some questions were still unanswered, was that it was impossible to do so for an out of state resident, basically for me the second amendment did not exist.
Well 3 years later I'm going back to visit my Sister in July, the first I have seen her in person since the wedding, but now the legal situation has changed, we now have the result of the Bruen case from SCOTUS.
New York lost, but you probably already know that. What I'm working on is how good this is.
I haven't had a chance to read the whole thing yet but from what I'm getting so far I think we can definitively say that "may issue" doesn't exist anymore, all 50 states, including California and New York, are now shall issue. Also the "two step" scrutiny method being used by some lower courts is now gone, they are to interpret only using the second amendment text and historical precedence alone.
My question is this: Since carrying is now an affirmed constitutional right and states no longer have discretion on who to carry to as long as they meet the requirments (the court seems to have stopped short of Constitutional Carry, but has left the door open) than doesn't it stand to reason that they must by extension recognize other state's permits or issue to out of state residents? Because if they require a permit but do not recognize other state's permits or issue out of state permits are they not violating this ruling? As that would be effectively the same as not issuing a license at all.
So does this mean we have national reciprocity now? Can my Michigan carry license now be used in Oregon and the people's republic of portland?
With this dropped now and the abortion thing set to drop within the next few days likely and the start of the summer riot season I can see the violent leftist nut jobs running around portland try to burn the city down again and my dear Sister is uncomfortably close, being in the Portland suburbs.
Well 3 years later I'm going back to visit my Sister in July, the first I have seen her in person since the wedding, but now the legal situation has changed, we now have the result of the Bruen case from SCOTUS.
New York lost, but you probably already know that. What I'm working on is how good this is.
I haven't had a chance to read the whole thing yet but from what I'm getting so far I think we can definitively say that "may issue" doesn't exist anymore, all 50 states, including California and New York, are now shall issue. Also the "two step" scrutiny method being used by some lower courts is now gone, they are to interpret only using the second amendment text and historical precedence alone.
My question is this: Since carrying is now an affirmed constitutional right and states no longer have discretion on who to carry to as long as they meet the requirments (the court seems to have stopped short of Constitutional Carry, but has left the door open) than doesn't it stand to reason that they must by extension recognize other state's permits or issue to out of state residents? Because if they require a permit but do not recognize other state's permits or issue out of state permits are they not violating this ruling? As that would be effectively the same as not issuing a license at all.
So does this mean we have national reciprocity now? Can my Michigan carry license now be used in Oregon and the people's republic of portland?
With this dropped now and the abortion thing set to drop within the next few days likely and the start of the summer riot season I can see the violent leftist nut jobs running around portland try to burn the city down again and my dear Sister is uncomfortably close, being in the Portland suburbs.