Platinum Supporter
- Messages
- 733
- Reactions
- 789
...needing a good laugh, I emailed ol' earl b. to get a rundown on his stance on 2nd Amendment issues. Here is the frightening reply:
February 2, 2010
Dear Mr. ********,
Thank you very much for writing to me about gun-related legislation in Congress.
Gun control continues to be one of the most reactionary and divisive topics in America. It's interesting to me that it's almost impossible to have a rational conversation about gun control in Congress. It should happen soon, but it probably won't because emotions run so deep regarding this issue.
I believe that safe, responsible gun ownership should be protected, but there is no reason why this cannot be done while simultaneously cracking down on those who give gun owners a bad name.
The most important step in protecting Americans from gun violence is to keep guns away from felons and domestic abusers. In the past, I have signed onto legislation which would require that guns be monitored by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives in order to protect Americans from an industry without external controls. I will continue to look for legislation that closes loopholes on the tracking and registration of guns which will ultimately make our communities safer.
We must also ensure the safety of legally purchased guns. There are several technological solutions available today that can keep our children safe from guns that are not locked away. We must invest in "smart gun" technology that will prevent unauthorized users from gaining access to handguns. A second, hidden serial number should be placed on every gun, thereby allowing guns used in crimes to be tracked, and all handguns should feature a load display to prevent accidental shootings. Toy guns, and teddy bears all face more stringent safety oversight and regulation than guns. The powerful gun lobby succeeded in exempting guns from consumer protection standards, and today there is no regulatory body to ensure that guns are properly manufactured - and no one who can issue a recall if they are not. I don't agree with this and think that stronger consumer protections for guns will benefit all Americans
Thank you for your letter. I appreciate hearing from you on this important and controversial issue.
Sincerely,
Earl Blumenauer
Member of Congress
February 2, 2010
Dear Mr. ********,
Thank you very much for writing to me about gun-related legislation in Congress.
Gun control continues to be one of the most reactionary and divisive topics in America. It's interesting to me that it's almost impossible to have a rational conversation about gun control in Congress. It should happen soon, but it probably won't because emotions run so deep regarding this issue.
I believe that safe, responsible gun ownership should be protected, but there is no reason why this cannot be done while simultaneously cracking down on those who give gun owners a bad name.
The most important step in protecting Americans from gun violence is to keep guns away from felons and domestic abusers. In the past, I have signed onto legislation which would require that guns be monitored by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives in order to protect Americans from an industry without external controls. I will continue to look for legislation that closes loopholes on the tracking and registration of guns which will ultimately make our communities safer.
We must also ensure the safety of legally purchased guns. There are several technological solutions available today that can keep our children safe from guns that are not locked away. We must invest in "smart gun" technology that will prevent unauthorized users from gaining access to handguns. A second, hidden serial number should be placed on every gun, thereby allowing guns used in crimes to be tracked, and all handguns should feature a load display to prevent accidental shootings. Toy guns, and teddy bears all face more stringent safety oversight and regulation than guns. The powerful gun lobby succeeded in exempting guns from consumer protection standards, and today there is no regulatory body to ensure that guns are properly manufactured - and no one who can issue a recall if they are not. I don't agree with this and think that stronger consumer protections for guns will benefit all Americans
Thank you for your letter. I appreciate hearing from you on this important and controversial issue.
Sincerely,
Earl Blumenauer
Member of Congress