Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Be careful what y'all wish for okay?
The only bigger threat to this country than abolishing the 2ndA, would be abolishing the 1stA.
Imagine if you will, if gun owners were under threat, yet had no voice at all. The NRA/SAF/GOA would all be neutered without a 1st Amendment.
It's nice to vent.
I believe however that y'all would find you might not like a world with mandatory licensing and registration of journalists. To me that's as clear as water being wet.
I see no reason why an honest media should be licenced or "permitted" in order to do there job! How ever, because they are speaking in a public forum, and that word is supposed to carry only un biased truth and be supported with honest facts. I see the need for a licence or permit because a great many do not report fairly or honestly! If they break the oath of reporting they loose the right to do so! Just like breaking the law, you do it enough or severally enough, you loose rights!
Oh no, you are one of the "responsible" journalists. We're not talking about you.......this would not affect you or those like you. It would only be for those "less desirable"...All this said, what about me? Think I need to be licensed?
ludicrous....next they will be telling me what I can and cant say on my own website blog.All this said, what about me? Think I need to be licensed?
All this said, what about me? Think I need to be licensed?
I see no reason why an honest media should be licenced or "permitted" in order to do there job! How ever, because they are speaking in a public forum, and that word is supposed to carry only un biased truth and be supported with honest facts. I see the need for a licence or permit because a great many do not report fairly or honestly! If they break the oath of reporting they loose the right to do so! Just like breaking the law, you do it enough or severally enough, you loose rights!
Freedom Of speech requires NO license or permission. It is the readers or receivers duty to decipher truth from fiction. Many countries do not have the freedom of speech we have and people are prosecuted for stating a mistruth or even something the government doesn't agree with.
NO............... COLD DAY IN HELL when we will allow that to be imposed here.
Again the 2nd is designed to defend the 1st. No exceptions.
IT IS part of the Constitution.
There is truth and there is lies and everyone best learn to tell the difference and verify for themselves. That is a small price to maintain true freedom.
.
They have been trying to shut up the the Pro 2nd Amendment groups for some time. That free speech can never be legitimately taken from the American Citizen.
This should clarify that well.
When it comes to defending the 2nd, they want you to lose that right, but at the same time they want the freedom to disparage the 2nd. Just the simple hypocrisy nullifies their opinion. Truth or lies or untold truths make no difference, it is still protected speech.
Places like Canada, The UK and many other nations do worse, prosecute people all the time if they don't agree or someone tells an untruth. They have no free speech. It is not an if amendment, it is the 1st, and most important Amendment.
So if you do not like what someone says for any reason, you still cannot restrict free speech. The fire in a theatre being one of the few things they excepted. Even that should not in actual practice be restricted. The consequences should be dealt with but not the speech itself.
There was a time when that WAS taught.Interesting video...i fast forwarded through some of it.
the logic expressed can be applied to virtually any Amendment including the 2nd.
wish they would hold a lecture like this in every school in the nation, every year.
And she ended it with a quote from good 'ole Ben Franklin, "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."