JavaScript is disabled
Our website requires JavaScript to function properly. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser settings before proceeding.
Messages
8,268
Reactions
18,029
Note that I posted this article here since I think it has long-term implications for gun control. Organizations such as the DHS and NSA are becoming obviously good at correlating data from multiple sources back to the individual. One must ask how long until they flag a gun owner as being of concern (e.g. due to mental-health issues) and then coming knocking...

Peter

Homeland Security is watching you.jpg

http://rt.com/usa/dhs-canada-depression-richardson-495/

Canadian denied entry to the US after agent cites private medical records

Published time: November 29, 2013

A wheelchair-bound Canadian woman was denied entry to the United States this week because she was previously diagnosed with clinical depression. Now she wants to know why the US Department of Homeland Security had her medical history on file.

The Toronto Star’s Valerie Haunch reported on Thursday that 50-year-old author Ellen Richardson was turned away from the city’s Pearson Airport three days earlier after DHS officials said she lacked the necessary medical clearance to cross into the US.

“I was turned away, I was told, because I had a hospitalization in the summer of 2012 for clinical depression,’’ Richardson told the Star.

The woman, who has been paraplegic since an unsuccessful suicide attempt in 2001, was planning to fly to New York City to start a 10-day Caribbean cruisein collaboration with a March of Dimes group, and had already invested around $6,000 into the trip, she told the paper.

“I was so aghast. I was saying, ‘I don’t understand this. What is the problem?’ I was so looking forward to getting away . . . I’d even brought a little string of Christmas lights I was going to string up in the cabin. . . . It’s not like I can just book again right away," she said.

But according to what American officials told her, it would take the permission of US government-approved doctor and around $500 in fees in order to enter the country. Richardson soon left the airport defeated, but only afterward did she begin to raise questions about what the DHS knew about her.

"It really hit me later — that it's quite stunning they have that information,” she told CBC.

Richardson said she has been on numerous cruises since 2001, and traveled through the US for all of them. Only this week, however, did the DHS cite the June 2012 hospital stay, spawning questions about how much personal information American officials hold on foreign persons.

According to Richardson, the border agent told her that the US Immigration and Nationality Act allows the government to deny entry to anyone with a physical or mental disorder that may pose a “threat to the property, safety or welfare,” and that her “mental illness episode’’ from last year warranted extra attention.

“The incident in 2012 was hospitalization for depression. Police were not involved,’’ her attorney, David McGhee, told the Star, adding that he approached Ontario Health Minister Deb Matthews as well “to tell me if she’s aware of any provincial or federal authority to allow US authorities to have access to our medical records.”

“Medical records are supposed to be strictly confidential,” McGhee said.

"We don't know how deep the connection is between US customs" and Canadian authorities, Richardson’s member of Parliament, Mike Sullivan, told CBC. With her story quickly going viral, however, others hope to soon find out the full scope of the data being managed by the DHS.

“This is scary,” MPP France Gelinas told the Star for a follow-up published Friday morning. “They got access to information that should never have been accessible to anyone.”

“Canadians must be assured that their personal records are kept confidential, as intended,” Sullivan added to Hauch’s latest report.

As RT reported previously, employees of the DHS’ Transportation Security Administration, or TSA, have access to huge databases, both federally and privately run, which contain information on travelers including tax ID numbers, past itineraries and even physical characteristics. As for hospital visits in other countries, however, Richardson and others generally expect that information to be not on file.

According to Star reporter Jack Lakey, an Ontario health ministry official said Thursday that US authorities “do not have access to medical or other health records for Ontarians travelling to the US.”

“If the province didn’t knowingly hand over the information, it only leaves the federal government as the source, possibly in some kind of information sharing agreement with the US that we aren’t supposed to know about,” Lakey speculated. “Given its recently revealed complicity in allowing the U.S. to spy on G8 and G20 leaders when they gathered here in 2010, it is no stretch to believe Ottawa is also playing ball with them on this.”

Homeland Security is watching you.jpg
 
Don't know how the U.S. got hold of records from Canada but it does raise questions about American contractors with security clearances.

Members of congress and government employees still have a reasonable expectation of privacy under HIPA. However, all others now have their medical records available to any authorized person under O-care. I can understand that you would want privacy for those with security clearances to prevent blackmail or pressure from outside sources. But since many government contractors have high level clearances, and have access to sensitive information, and they don't have the protection that government employees have, there is now an opening for widespread abuse of their health information.
 
I just came out of four years in the healthcare sector, and my faith in HIPAA is crushed. Moreover, our own Fed government threw HIPAA under the bus with their national website https://www.healthcare.gov/ when they put clauses on there indicating that one should have no expectation of the security of their own data entered on that website.

Peter
 
Something in this story set off my BS detector, and two seconds of Google searching confirmed it.

For a start, the Canadian woman is an author. An author with a public website that describes her mental problems and attempts at suicide, and she published a book on her story in 2009.

<broken link removed>


Ellen had a severely dysfunctional upbringing and a diagnosis of depression in 1986. She completed a bachelor degree, where, upon graduation, was awarded a medal for exemplary character. She went on to earn a master's degree in counseling in 1998. Two years post-graduation, her depression flared up in a way that was unfamiliar to her. The movie, A Beautiful Mind, cleverly portrays this state and is based on a true story; the film also won the Oscar for Best Picture in the year it came out (2002). After Ellen had made over 60 visits to the emerg looking for treatment, and spent 11 months in this state, Ellen inevitably got the proper medication in July 2001 which cleared the condition, but not before "tragedy" had struck. She became paralyzed from the waist down after a jump from the Bloor Street Viaduct in May 2001&#8212;a suicide attempt she made while her mind was not in her control.

So it's not exactly a top secret health record, is it?

I'm betting this story is debunked by end of the week.
 
Something in this story set off my BS detector, and two seconds of Google searching confirmed it.

For a start, the Canadian woman is an author. An author with a public website that describes her mental problems and attempts at suicide, and she published a book on her story in 2009.

<broken link removed>




So it's not exactly a top secret health record, is it?

I'm betting this story is debunked by end of the week.

And that disqualified her from travel.....how ???
 
And that disqualified her from travel.....how ???

I thought it was fairly well known that the USCIS will turn back people with mental illnesses who may harm themselves or others. It's been the law since the 1952 update to the Immigration Act.

In the case of this women, with over 60 emergency admissions, and a long history of delusions and suicide attempts, she certainly fit the criteria. You can certainly argue with the intent of the law, but you can't argue that DHS isn't doing exactly what the law says they should.

INA: ACT 212 - GENERAL CLASSES OF ALIENS INELIGIBLE TO RECEIVE VISAS AND INELIGIBLE FOR ADMISSION; WAIVERS OF INADMISSIBILLITY

(a) Classes of Aliens Ineligible for Visas or Admission.-Except as otherwise provided in this Act, aliens who are inadmissible under the following paragraphs are ineligible to receive visas and ineligible to be admitted to the United States:

(1) Health-related grounds.-

(A) In general.-Any alien-

(deleted)

(iii) who is determined (in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Health and Human Services in consultation with the Attorney General)-

(I) to have a physical or mental disorder and behavior associated with the disorder that may pose, or has posed, a threat to the property, safety, or welfare of the alien or others, or

(II) to have had a physical or mental disorder and a history of behavior associated with the disorder, which behavior has posed a threat to the property, safety, or welfare of the alien or others and which behavior is likely to recur or to lead to other harmful behavior, or

Maybe the lesson here is that if you suffer from a terrible mental illness and write a book about it, there may be unforeseen consequences? I'm not saying that's great, but it appears to be what happened.
 
SO file this one in the same bin as LAST LEAD REFINERY IN THE USA TO CLOSE DOWN..........something else none of us actually need to worry about.
 
Something in this story set off my BS detector, and two seconds of Google searching confirmed it.

For a start, the Canadian woman is an author. An author with a public website that describes her mental problems and attempts at suicide, and she published a book on her story in 2009.

<broken link removed>




So it's not exactly a top secret health record, is it?

I'm betting this story is debunked by end of the week.

The book came out in 2009, but they based the denial on a 2012 hospitalization.
I don't know what sort of modern math you are applying, but using good old basic arithmetic that even an ancient Greek would have no trouble of recognizing (except for the funny looking Arabic numbers) I have calculated that she could not have possibility written about it in her book.
 
The book came out in 2009, but they based the denial on a 2012 hospitalization.

For which she almost certainly called 911 or had a police report filed, which would come up on any sort of DHS check. They've been doing it for years.

Canadians with mental illnesses denied U.S. entry - Canada - CBC News (from 2011)

According to diplomatic cables released earlier this year by WikiLeaks, any information entered into the national Canadian Police Information Centre (CPIC) database is accessible to American authorities.

Local police officers take notes whenever they apprehend an individual or respond to a 911 call, and some of this information is then entered into the CPIC database, says Stylianos. He says that occasionally this can include non-violent mental health incidents in which police are involved.

In Kamenitz's case, this could explain how U.S. officials had a record of the police response to the 911 call her partner made in 2006, after Kamenitz took an overdose of pills.

Regardless, the woman from the original story is clearly ineligible to visit the US under current law. She has posed a threat to her own welfare. She needs to get a waiver to enter the US.

(I) to have a physical or mental disorder and behavior associated with the disorder that may pose, or has posed, a threat to the property, safety, or welfare of the alien or others
 
But they will let undocumented terrorists, drug dealers, drug runners, cartel members, murderers rapists, child molestors into the country and then order local LE not to arrest or deport them.
Oh yeah, makes a lot of sense............................................................
 
I just came out of four years in the healthcare sector, and my faith in HIPAA is crushed. Moreover, our own Fed government threw HIPAA under the bus with their national website https://www.healthcare.gov/ when they put clauses on there indicating that one should have no expectation of the security of their own data entered on that website.

Peter

I spent 15 years in healthcare billing and was doing it all through HIPAA and it doesn't surprise me they blatantly disregard it. This corrupt group in charge now do virtually what they want. How many servers are their in Canada??? Probably not that many. Tons of info are on US servers and let's face it, DHS/NSA has an uber google that they can use to keyword your name and associated "areas of possible concern. ACA is built to gain access to every shred of personal information possible. 52% of the population sold out 100% of the population and most of them are too busy with current baby bumps or the tragedy of a "star" killing himself in an auto accident.

Brutus Out
 
Moreover, our own Fed government threw HIPAA under the bus with their national website https://www.healthcare.gov/ when they put clauses on there indicating that one should have no expectation of the security of their own data entered on that website.

Not true.

PolitiFact | Healthcare.gov users 'waive any reasonable right to privacy,' Rep. Barton says

Barton claimed healthcare.gov has "hidden" code indicating that consumers waive their rights to privacy when they apply for insurance. The website’s markup does include a sentence along these lines that isn’t visible to the user. But because it’s not displayed to the public, it carries no legal weight and consumers can’t consent to it. Bottom line, it doesn’t change a thing about the privacy protections in place at healthcare.gov. We rate Barton’s claim False.
 

Upcoming Events

Redmond Gun Show
Redmond, OR
Klamath Falls gun show
Klamath Falls, OR
Centralia Gun Show
Centralia, WA

New Resource Reviews

New Classified Ads

Back Top