Looks like the headline was in error...the charge appears to be murder.Dallas officer who shot man in his own apartment indicted on manslaughter charge
Indicted. As she should be.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Looks like the headline was in error...the charge appears to be murder.Dallas officer who shot man in his own apartment indicted on manslaughter charge
Indicted. As she should be.
This kind of stuff is what really gets me when these "high profile" things happen. Headline after headline and article after article tell totally different versions of the same story. Makes it real hard to try to get anything close to facts.Looks like the headline was in error...the charge appears to be murder.
Interesting. So they finally release the recording of the 911 call, but still have not released the TOX SCREEN! I read somewhere else that they waited several hours before they took a blood sample (trying to give time for her system to clear?or just typical inefficiency?) It still stinks and adds to the narrative that cops and the system are racist and corrupt, and that they will do whatever they can to cover up or minimize an officer's misdeeds. I don't believe that is the case, generally, but this event sure appears that way.Give a listen, first 90 seconds anyway - just released 911
https://www.theroot.com/ex-dallas-police-officer-amber-guygers-frantic-911-call-1834425337
You first.Disarm law enforcement across the board. Allow for SWAT/SRT teams for armed situations.
Cops are not in as much danger as they tell the public. There is -no need- for armed confrontation at every stop.
Um...NO.Disarm law enforcement across the board. Allow for SWAT/SRT teams for armed situations.
Cops are not in as much danger as they tell the public. There is -no need- for armed confrontation at every stop.
Disarm law enforcement across the board. Allow for SWAT/SRT teams for armed situations.
Cops are not in as much danger as they tell the public. There is -no need- for armed confrontation at every stop.
In my time as an LEO, I only had to pull my sidearm 3-4 times, hence "No armed confrontation" at every stop or even a fraction of them.
That sir is one of the dumbest things I've read on the internet. Surely you jest.
You approached me, without my consent, with a firearm proudly displayed. That's an armed confrontation, friend.
How would you respond if you were doing paperwork in your cruiser and I approached your car with a firearm?
You'd consider an Officer approaching someone in the line of duty an armed confrontation?You approached me, without my consent, with a firearm proudly displayed. That's an armed confrontation, friend.