Platinum Supporter
- Messages
- 732
- Reactions
- 787
I had already posted this in the thread "Mexican cartels amass better arsenal, mostly bought in U.S." over in the legal & political section but thought it needed a bit more fanfare, as this is one of those anti slurs that really annoys me. I had contacted one of the editors to challenge several aspects of that story, but amazingly I actually gained a bit of traction with one complaint: the use of the term 'cop killer'...they've agreed to give that tired ol' bit of slander the boot...their reply is below..
"I spoke to my bosses about the term 'cop-killer'. They agreed that the term is prejudicial and that we shouldn't be using it. They've told the copy editors (the folks who edit the stories and the write headlines) to strike it from stories and to use 'armor-piercing' to describe ammunition designed to penetrate protective bulletproof gear. If the term 'cop killer' appears in the paper again, you can be sure that the person who let it in will be hearing about it from the bosses".
chalk one up for the good guys!
"I spoke to my bosses about the term 'cop-killer'. They agreed that the term is prejudicial and that we shouldn't be using it. They've told the copy editors (the folks who edit the stories and the write headlines) to strike it from stories and to use 'armor-piercing' to describe ammunition designed to penetrate protective bulletproof gear. If the term 'cop killer' appears in the paper again, you can be sure that the person who let it in will be hearing about it from the bosses".
chalk one up for the good guys!