- Messages
- 2,157
- Reactions
- 2,608
I made a quick video that compares the upper rails on two rifles;
First you see my "old" AR15, purchased as separate upper and lowers from PSA, the upper is a 16" Premium CHF model from several years ago. I've swapped at least 15-20 different optics on and off this rail and the workmanship speaks for itself.
The edges of the rail are crisp and clean.
Then you'll see my newly purchased PSA 10.5" CHF Geissele 9.5" MK14 mlok upper. The rail on the Geissele hand guard is as expected, but the PSA upper that it came on, the metal looks very rough?
I sent that video to PSA to get their opinion and they were not happy with the QC and have sent me a pre-paid label to return the upper for a replacement that I expect will be meticulously QC'd.
Probably would have functioned fine, but for that premium price tag, I'm happy they're swapping it.
Technically it's a pistol, but I figured the receiver is the point of the video and this was the right place to post
First you see my "old" AR15, purchased as separate upper and lowers from PSA, the upper is a 16" Premium CHF model from several years ago. I've swapped at least 15-20 different optics on and off this rail and the workmanship speaks for itself.
The edges of the rail are crisp and clean.
Then you'll see my newly purchased PSA 10.5" CHF Geissele 9.5" MK14 mlok upper. The rail on the Geissele hand guard is as expected, but the PSA upper that it came on, the metal looks very rough?
I sent that video to PSA to get their opinion and they were not happy with the QC and have sent me a pre-paid label to return the upper for a replacement that I expect will be meticulously QC'd.
Probably would have functioned fine, but for that premium price tag, I'm happy they're swapping it.
Technically it's a pistol, but I figured the receiver is the point of the video and this was the right place to post