Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Legal & Political Archive' started by Buster1, Jan 6, 2016.
Thanks for posting.
Done, and thanks
Got er done!
I had to go on CNN's web sight.
I feel icky now.
Done. But look how they worded it. They did not ask 'should' it be done.
I thought it a strange question as well. Had to read it three times.
Tough ain't the issue.
Stupid, worthless and overly restrictive is the issue.
We'll deal with the illegality later.
done. i need a shower now.
They changed the wording from the way it was when I posted the link. Before it said, "Do you support enhanced background checks"?
Fuggers obviously didn't like the results.
Done! I need a shower with lots of borax and wire brushing! Loved the loaded question, but will it matter? Prolly not
Good grief, what a poorly worded question. They probably assume most people wouldn't read it correctly and would instantly answer "no" to any question on more gun control. Looks like it's backfiring, since currently 73.3% are voting "yes"
Now I need to go clean the CNN off my computer
Gotta watch it, that CNN can ruin a otherwise good computer!!!
Is toughening gun-sale requirements too tough a change? Yes or no....
Lets me thinks..................Uh....................OK? Does this mean they CNN are in support of loosening the restrictive requirements?
Sorry I had to use the swear word "CNN" in my post! Yucky, I need another shower
Was a bit disgusting, but ya gotta do what ya gotta do!