Clinton Delagate Admits "Sensible Gun Laws" Goal Is Gun Ban

[3MTA3]

Project Veritas James O'Keefe Exposes the truth once again:

Story at Exclusive Video: Clinton Delegate Explains how Democrats Will Ban All Guns (http://www.infowars.com/video-hillary-delegate-admits-goal-behind-common-sense-gun-measures-is-outright-gun-ban/)

Editor's note: This is a Project Veritas exclusive in association with Infowars. James O'Keefe will be on the Alex Jones Show today at noon CST to discuss the story.

If your goal is an outright gun ban, you need to use terms such as "common sense gun legislation" to fool the public, a Hillary Clinton campaign delegate admitted in a recent undercover sting video released exclusively to Infowars.

"Saying you want to ban guns altogether, that's going to piss everybody off," the Clinton alternate delegate, Mary Bayer, told a Project Veritas reporter.


Instead, Bayer revealed, Democrats use "moderate" language when it comes to guns to obscure their true purpose, a complete elimination of the Second Amendment.

"You have to take that sort of moderate… 'We just wanna have common sense legislation so our children are safe!'" Bayer told the reporter, adding, "You say bubblegum like that, and then people will buy into it."

Bayer also admitted Hillary "for sure" would support banning guns, and said the only way to actualize that goal would be to "get Democrats in office."

The delegate's admission is particularly concerning given the fact that Clinton campaigns on the promise of enacting "common sense approaches" to gun control if elected president in November.

Bayer's revelations of a potential gun ban are also reminiscent of sentiments made public in 2014 by Poughkeepsie Mayor John Tkazyik, once a member of former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg's "Mayors Against Illegal Guns," who warned that the billionaire's anti-gun group – largely comprised of Democrat mayors and which advocated "common sense gun laws" – was a cover for gun confiscation.

"Under the guise of helping mayors facing a crime and drug epidemic, MAIG intended to promote confiscation of guns from law-abiding citizens," Tkazyik penned in an op-ed for the Poughkeepsie Journal, confirming what many already suspected about the group.

The latest damning sting video follows another Project Veritas effort in which reporters posing as the group "Citizens Against Senseless Violence" asked anti-gun politicians if they would display signs on their front lawns declaring their homes "Gun free zones."

Unsurprisingly, none of the politicians wanted the sign displayed at their homes.

Project Veritas founder James O'Keefe says his organization will also be seeking additional support for his anti-gun effort from delegates at the Democrat National Convention this week in Philadelphia.

​

Read More

 

[Bam]

These morons just don't get it.

It is impossible to ban guns in this country. There are over 300 millions guns in this country. They really think the majority of people will voluntarily turn them in, give them up? There is a reason why people are buying them in record numbers now, to have them when they need them. And look at the states that passed gun registration, the majority did not comply!

Pissing on the constitution will only cause this country's second civil war and when the gun loving population vastly out numbers law enforcement? Who do you think is going to win?

While I don't agree with Turkish politics, I like to use it as an example of a group that turned on the country and now look where they are now. Dems... it won't be you rounding up guns, it will be us rounding you up.

I am all for COMMON SENSE laws, but none of this is even comes close to sensible.

 

[v0lcom13sn0w]

lol like we didnt know this already. just sayin.

come the second civil war i highly doubt local LEOs and military will comply with the govt.

do these people think "COME AND TAKE'M" is a joke?

 

[CamoDeafie]

do these people think "COME AND TAKE'M" is a joke?

Yes. They really think so.

 

[albin25]

"v0lcom13sn0w said: ↑
do these people think "COME AND TAKE'M" is a joke?"

Of course they do, almost everything they say is either a joke or a lie...
...they therefore think everything anyone else says is also a joke or a lie.

 

[bmtm09]

lol like we didnt know this already. just sayin.

come the second civil war i highly doubt local LEOs and military will comply with the govt.

do these people think "COME AND TAKE'M" is a joke?

Unfortunately I think they do too......blood will probably have to be spilled in order for them to see the lengths some ..most...people will go to to protect their God given right to self protection

 

[Bam]

come the second civil war i highly doubt local LEOs and military will comply with the govt.

LEOs in South California, New England, Illinois salivate at the chance of going door to door.

Heck, even here in the Northwest. Portland PD, King County Sheriff, Seattle PD, Lane County, would be willing to go door to door.

 

[Brutus57]

Oh, they have no problem spilling blood, just read all folks the Clintons have buried. Even if only a 10th of the victims were not "accidents" it numbers in the dozens. They will literally do anything to get her elected and appointing SCOTUS judges to strike down the 2nd Amendment. They think because the NRA and its members don't burn police cars and block freeways that we have no backbone. Where's the popcorn? I can't wait.

Brutus Out

 

[bmtm09]

Maybe Trump will win and for the next 8 years we won't have to worry about it..he is very pro 2nd ammendment

 

[Brutus57]

LEOs in South California, New England, Illinois salivate at the chance of going door to door.

Heck, even here in the Northwest. Portland PD, King County Sheriff, Seattle PD, Lane County, would be willing to go door to door.

You are joking right? Because there are tens of thousands of illegal guns in Chicago.

Brutus out

 

[PaulB47]

Maybe Trump will win and for the next 8 years we won't have to worry about it.

Sorta like Bush? Oops...

When R's are president, gun owners fall asleep. That is when gun control legislation is passed.

 

[bmtm09]

Bush was fairly quiet about gun laws....Trump is at least vocal. I remember reading on Bush's 2nd amendment stance and it was vague. Trumps is very black and white

PROTECTING OUR SECOND AMENDMENT RIGHTS WILL MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
Donald J. Trump on the Right to Keep and Bear Arms

The Second Amendment to our Constitution is clear. The right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed upon. Period.



The Second Amendment guarantees a fundamental right that belongs to all law-abiding Americans. The Constitution doesn't create that right – it ensures that the government can't take it away. Our Founding Fathers knew, and our Supreme Court has upheld, that the Second Amendment's purpose is to guarantee our right to defend ourselves and our families. This is about self-defense, plain and simple.



It's been said that the Second Amendment is America's first freedom. That's because the Right to Keep and Bear Arms protects all our other rights. We are the only country in the world that has a Second Amendment. Protecting that freedom is imperative. Here's how we will do that:



Enforce The Laws On The Books



We need to get serious about prosecuting violent criminals. The Obama administration's record on that is abysmal. Violent crime in cities like Baltimore, Chicago and many others is out of control. Drug dealers and gang members are given a slap on the wrist and turned loose on the street. This needs to stop.



Several years ago there was a tremendous program in Richmond, Virginia called Project Exile. It said that if a violent felon uses a gun to commit a crime, you will be prosecuted in federal court and go to prison for five years – no parole or early release. Obama's former Attorney General, Eric Holder, called that a "cookie cutter" program. That's ridiculous. I call that program a success. Murders committed with guns in Richmond decreased by over 60% when Project Exile was in place – in the first two years of the program alone, 350 armed felons were taken off the street.



Why does that matter to law-abiding gun owners? Because they're the ones who anti-gun politicians and the media blame when criminals misuse guns. We need to bring back and expand programs like Project Exile and get gang members and drug dealers off the street. When we do, crime will go down and our cities and communities will be safer places to live.



Here's another important way to fight crime – empower law-abiding gun owners to defend themselves. Law enforcement is great, they do a tremendous job, but they can't be everywhere all of the time. Our personal protection is ultimately up to us. That's why I'm a gun owner, that's why I have a concealed carry permit, and that's why tens of millions of Americans have concealed carry permits as well. It's just common sense. To make America great again, we're going to go after criminals and put the law back on the side of the law-abiding.



Fix Our Broken Mental Health System



Let's be clear about this. Our mental health system is broken. It needs to be fixed. Too many politicians have ignored this problem for too long.



All of the tragic mass murders that occurred in the past several years have something in common – there were red flags that were ignored. We can't allow that to continue. We need to expand treatment programs, because most people with mental health problems aren't violent, they just need help. But for those who are violent, a danger to themselves or others, we need to get them off the street before they can terrorize our communities. This is just common sense.



And why does this matter to law-abiding gun owners? Once again, because they get blamed by anti-gun politicians, gun control groups and the media for the acts of deranged madmen. When one of these tragedies occurs, we can count on two things: one, that opponents of gun rights will immediately exploit it to push their political agenda; and two, that none of their so-called "solutions" would have prevented the tragedy in the first place. They've even admitted it.



We need real solutions to address real problems. Not grandstanding or political agendas.



Defend The Rights of Law-Abiding Gun Owners



GUN AND MAGAZINE BANS. Gun and magazine bans are a total failure. That's been proven every time it's been tried. Opponents of gun rights try to come up with scary sounding phrases like "assault weapons", "military-style weapons" and "high capacity magazines" to confuse people. What they're really talking about are popular semi-automatic rifles and standard magazines that are owned by tens of millions of Americans. Law-abiding people should be allowed to own the firearm of their choice. The government has no business dictating what types of firearms good, honest people are allowed to own.



BACKGROUND CHECKS. There has been a national background check system in place since 1998. Every time a person buys a gun from a federally licensed gun dealer – which is the overwhelming majority of all gun purchases – they go through a federal background check. Study after study has shown that very few criminals are stupid enough to try and pass a background check – they get their guns from friends/family members or by stealing them. So the overwhelming majority of people who go through background checks are law-abiding gun owners. When the system was created, gun owners were promised that it would be instant, accurate and fair. Unfortunately, that isn't the case today. Too many states are failing to put criminal and mental health records into the system – and it should go without saying that a system's only going to be as effective as the records that are put into it. What we need to do is fix the system we have and make it work as intended. What we don't need to do is expand a broken system.



NATIONAL RIGHT TO CARRY. The right of self-defense doesn't stop at the end of your driveway. That's why I have a concealed carry permit and why tens of millions of Americans do too. That permit should be valid in all 50 states. A driver's license works in every state, so it's common sense that a concealed carry permit should work in every state. If we can do that for driving – which is a privilege, not a right – then surely we can do that for concealed carry, which is a right, not a privilege.



MILITARY BASES AND RECRUITING CENTERS. Banning our military from carrying firearms on bases and at recruiting centers is ridiculous. We train our military how to safely and responsibly use firearms, but our current policies leave them defenseless. To make America great again, we need a strong military. To have a strong military, we need to allow them to defend themselves.

This is from His website

 

[Ura-Ki]

Common sense gun laws! Whose Common Sense? Killery has made is plain as day, Gut the 2nd and disarm us all!​

 

[Pandaz3]

"come the second civil war i highly doubt local LEOs and military will comply with the govt"
Well I think they will do their job and take'em. They are the muscle of the politicians, they don't get to pick and choose, what they will do.

 

[v0lcom13sn0w]

"come the second civil war i highly doubt local LEOs and military will comply with the govt"
Well I think they will do their job and take'em. They are the muscle of the politicians, they don't get to pick and choose, what they will do.

everyone has a choice. depends what means more to them. the oath they took or tyranny.

 

[bmtm09]

"come the second civil war i highly doubt local LEOs and military will comply with the govt"
Well I think they will do their job and take'em. They are the muscle of the politicians, they don't get to pick and choose, what they will do.

How many sheriff depts said they would not enforce i594? How many have said they do not agree with the administration and would not follow unconstitutional laws? How many cops do you know personally? Have you asked them? How many cops own private firearms ? Their families? How many cops are just like us? How many cops are on this forum and just dont say anything because its not who they are its what they do. Its a job and if an order is something they dont believe in they wont do it

 

[Ura-Ki]

The real question should it come to this, How long must we endure the attempts at confiscation before enough 'Mericans stand up and fight back? The real fear is the dems roll in the U.N. to do the dirty work! Confiscation can only have a small chance of working if the U.N. comes ashore! Other wise, LEO are likely not going to comply!

 

[Ura-Ki]

And for those of you following PaulB47, The position he is posing isn't that far off the mark, but it will take something like this to get THAT ball rolling!

 

[clearconscience]

That's why their creating the welfare state, making people dependent on the govt.
They are releasing or being easy on offenders and criminals so they added violence will push more gun laws.
They are controlling IRS, healthcare, taxes, etc.

Little by little control the population and control what we teach the youth.
And push gun laws little by little Until the majority is against them or have given up on them and they can realize their goal.

How long until the clinton kids run for office?

 

[Osarion]

I'm far from sticking up for HRC here but...

You realize that individual delegates have zero direct affiliation with a parties nominee, right? This is like an article saying:

"A 3rd party beverage vendor from the Seattle Fred Meyer's went on the record to say that Rodney McMullen, CEO of Kroger is planning to replace all checkers with advanced robot chipmunks".

In no way shape or form are delegates representatives of a political party, or privy to any type of insider information on political strategies.
This article is flat out nonsense. Use your brains, good forumgoers...