- Messages
- 3,743
- Reactions
- 6,935
For everyone who got "bent-out-of shape" when I said, "Double Stack" mags are not necessary, I have this to say to you all! The Colt Model 911 A1A, served this country well from WW1, WW2, Korea and the Vietnam Era. It was a "single" mag. Double stack mags make the handle too thick, (unless you have huge hands), make the weapon too heavy and if you can't get a good grip on the gun it"rocks around" in your hand when fired then its not accurate!
Pistols with double stack mags are NOT comfortable to conceal carry at all. Especailly, IWB. Actually, only shoulder holsters are the best and most comfortable way to carry (any) weapon, single or double stack or revolvers ! Pistols in your pocket are also "uncomfortable", especially sitting down. And useless if your driving a car and need it quickly. U can't pull it out w/o standing up. So its pointless to even have it w/you. I have owned all kind of guns and I am back to the good old 38 Special. FYI~~~The 38 Special bullet had more penetration and stopping power than 9mm. (fact). And, the 7.65 mm (32 cal) goes thru more phone books at 25 yrs. than a 357 and is more accurate since it "kicks less. (fact). Remember, James Bond carried a 7.75 caliber pistol in a shoulder holster (Walther PPK). There was a reason for that! Remember shot placement "trumps" caliber every time! One shot, one funeral!
I never stated in the contrary to any of the remarks you posted, BUT there are double stacks that are way comfy in the pocket or in the waist.
You may want to look at the bersa thunder pro 15+1 in .380 (yes I know, here I go again) as it is an almost exact replica of Bonds Walther PPK except it has an auto decock, adjustable sights and many more options that Bonds didn't.
No offence to any of my vertically challenged friends, but unless you have the hands of one of snow whites little buddies this is a SWEET double stacker that I'd put up against any of the others