Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They should have invested in a desalination plant.
Why should California desalinate when it will be so easy to hijack the Columbia river!?!?!?!?!?!?!?
Sheldon
Informal Settlements Still Ran Water Day and Night
The taps in the informal settlements still ran day and night. The local government was too scared of the mass protests that would follow if they shut this supply down, so only the paying, law-abiding citizens had their water rations cut even more.
America Faces Similar Influx of Unemployed People
This is a true reflection of the situation in Cape Town over the past few years. It may not be "politically correct", as we are supposed to welcome all of the previously disadvantaged people into our areas and provide them with services and housing, even when they do not pay for them and do not buy into the saving plans that are put into place. America faces a similar influx of unemployed people. Your humanity will force you to share your resources with them to the detriment of your own people. May God keep the rains falling and keep you all safe.
Are you really though?I for one am having a difficult time understanding the level of incompetents within the South African Government
Now that half of the CA progressive population virus is up here of course they will vote to send our water back down there.Why should California desalinate when it will be so easy to hijack the Columbia river!?!?!?!?!?!?!?
Sheldon
Wrong. 6.07 gallons a day per person. We usually advocate drinking a mimimum of 1 gallon a day, so that leaves 5 gallons for washing/food prep/waste management
If the taps are turned off, residents will be required to travel to one of the 200 municipal water points across the city to collect a maximum ration of 25 litres per day."
Cape Town could become first major city in world to run out of water
Please note the bolded (emphasis mine). What I referred to as 6.07 gallons a day was strictly on the basis of "if the taps are turned off, restrict to 25 litres a day". Which would indeed be a serious issue, but the article is not quite clear becauseLilhigbee responded but I'll flesh that thought out. I was referring to the article where they noted that due to drought: "...officials have introduced strict measures to limit the consumption of available water, including capping usage at 87 litres per person per day." 87 liters is 23 gallons...a day.
Which tells me that if they are allowing folks 23 gallons a day, they aren't really in trouble, or they aren't really serious about dealing with the issue. Perhaps both. Perhaps there is other info not provided. If they are about to run out of water "BUT GO AHEAD AND USE 23 GALLONS A DAY" I can't say I'm all that interested in their fake issues.