Silver Lifetime
- Messages
- 701
- Reactions
- 180
Thank God I moved from that heck hole!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I just moved down here into the heart of the beast (no choice so dont ask why) This was one of 3 anti gun laws signed into law on sunday. Open carry ban, long gun registration (adds to the hand gun registration already in place) and the fees they charge for DROS (dealer report of sale) are supposed to be going up. One good veto that happened was the ammo bill (more paperwork required for purchasing handgun ammo) and from the veto letter Moonbeam says he veto'd it due to litigation being ongoing with the same basic bill from last year. I dont know how long I can live in a state like this one.
The open carry ban was more of a 1A defeat than a 2A defeat because Unloaded Open Carry was more of a statement than an actual functioning means of defence. The one good thing about this is it may offer a path for Shal issue in CA (which is debated by a lot of people on calguns) by eliminating the one cary method that the courts said, removed the requirement of issuing carry permits.
This is all my interpretation from reading on the forums, I am sure I am not 100% accurate on everything stated and I am not a lawyer or politician. I am just a gun owner sitting in a tornado of liberalism that is destroying the country one stupid law at a time.
Good luck my friend. Keep your head down and don't get any on ya.
well after reading the bill here
<broken link removed>
ANY ONE except John Q Public can carry
7574.14. This chapter shall not apply to the following:
(a) An officer or employee of the United States of America, or of
this state or a political subdivision thereof,
(b) A person engaged exclusively in the business of obtaining and
furnishing information as to the financial rating of persons.
(c) A charitable philanthropic society or association incorporated
under the laws of this state that is organized and duly maintained
for the public good and not for private profit.
.........
__________________
So let me get this straight. The Federal government said that they're going to go after medical mj distribution centers in Kali because they violate federal drug laws. Why aren't they also going after them for violating the Constitution then? Shall not be infringed is pretty damn simple to understand.
Solution as I have suggested before:
Can you leave that upper left corner? That's where the good weed comes from.
Item c) then would exempt NRA members or Red Cross or members of the local non-profit soccer association? Lots of exceptions listed. It is a bad law, but with all of these exceptions I'm sure I would fit in somewhere....
So let me get this straight. The Federal government said that they're going to go after medical mj distribution centers in Kali because they violate federal drug laws. Why aren't they also going after them for violating the Constitution then? Shall not be infringed is pretty damn simple to understand.
6 dead in cali shooting
thanks jerry guncontrol really works
<broken link removed>