Bronze Lifetime
- Messages
- 6,428
- Reactions
- 12,494
Me neither!I'm quite sure this will be resolved very soon; gears in motion. Regardless, as far as I can see, nothing stated by any moderator here has been factually inaccurate.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Me neither!I'm quite sure this will be resolved very soon; gears in motion. Regardless, as far as I can see, nothing stated by any moderator here has been factually inaccurate.
Nice try. But hey 'gears are in motion'Your recollection is wrong. That was a Franken-thread.
Be that as it may, you were the one in the early outbreaks that boldly stated "I predict you all are going to see the dust settle, and you are going to recognize these numbers did not even come close to seasonal flu numbers". Well done on that prophecy.
Oh and you were the one that recommended we watch a David Icke video on the topic. You know Icke, the one that one traffics in the "theory" that Lizard Aliens from the Fourth Dimension control the world, though he recommends aluminum foil for protection.
Good luck with all that.
Illustrating, by linking to, what you said and believe? There is no "try" about that; that is now painfully obvious to anyone with the most basic of reading comprehension. What will become of such unbelievably absurd content involves other individuals, hence the allusion to gears in motion.Nice try. But hey 'gears are in motion'
So.....on that note, with somewhere betwixt 1325 and 1433 Seattle officers on the job right now and with the possibility of losing 200 or so officers that'll be roughly a 15% reduction in force. It would be interesting to see how it correlates and if there is a:Next guy: Danger, danger! Everybody carry a gun!
If only they lived in a place that looked favorably on those who defend themselves.My bet is that a 15% reduction will end up with a much larger increase in crime. It's sad really. Folks in that area are going to really have to understand that they are going to be their only form of protection.
It's a lousy job. More often than not they are just there to clean up the mess.The police are short handed as it is and the time for them to respond is already at a point that by the time they arrive, the dust has already settled.
Much deterrence is by mere presence, so by that, I would guess we will see a much larger increase in crimes, especially violent ones, where the lack of fear of arrest will drive that much higher! Drug crimes, thefts, assaults, all correlated to lack of fear of!So.....on that note, with somewhere betwixt 1325 and 1433 Seattle officers on the job right now and with the possibility of losing 200 or so officers that'll be roughly a 15% reduction in force. It would be interesting to see how it correlates and if there is a:
My bet is that a 15% reduction will end up with a much larger increase in crime. It's sad really. Folks in that area are going to really have to understand that they are going to be their only form of protection. The police are short handed as it is and the time for them to respond is already at a point that by the time they arrive, the dust has already settled.
- 15% uptick in crime
- 15% increase in time to respond (or 15% less actual responses to crime)
- 15% increase in Conceal Carry permits
Well first that is not entirely correct.Theres no indication there is anything wrong with it. And this isnt brand new, untested science - we've been doing the vaccine thing for a while now. We have it pretty well figured out.
With all due respect to your position here at NWFA, you may want to take a chill pill. People cannot be controlled, only bullied by those who have the ability to unplug the one they don't like for one reason or another. It's being noticed.Illustrating, by linking to, what you said and believe? There is no "try" about that; that is now painfully obvious to anyone with the most basic of reading comprehension. What will become of such unbelievably absurd content involves other individuals, hence the allusion to gears in motion.
TrueWell first that is not entirely correct.
1) This is the first time a mRNA vaccine has been brought to market.
True2) This isnt a true vaccine, since it does not contain any element of the virus.
Source please.3) and more people have died from this vaccine then all other vaccines combided for the last 10 years.
There has been lots and lot's of money made for many parties from this situation.The reason? The vax is "free"….. actually paid for by the taxpayers, and they make money for every dose injected. It'll be interesting when it comes to light on just how many politicians around the world own stock in these big pharma companies.
It's ALWAYS ALWAYS ALWAYS about…. the money.
FYI, there is a user friendly VAERS link from the CDC website. I use this. It's data from VAERS, CDC states:Sorry, you did not check the VAERS website. You checked the VAERS Analysis website, which is a non-scientific BS website created by a professional website developer who is an anti-vaxer (I hate that term but will use it in this case) with no medical credentials. You can not actually see VAERS data without downloading a data file. You can find the actual VAERS website at:
Sorry, my bad if I got it wrong. I thought you were following the lead of that other guy (Who shall go unnamed) who was touting the VAERS Analysis website. Could you point me to the spot on wonder.cdc.gov that says there have been over 500,000 adverse reactions? I looked but couldn't find it. Thanks.FYI, there is a user friendly VAERS link from the CDC website. I use this. It's data from VAERS, CDC states:
CDC WONDER is a public service developed and operated by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, an agency of United States federal government. The public web site at http://wonder.cdc.gov is in the public domain, and only provides access to public use data and information.
Always appreciate fact checking, but sometimes there is more that one way to get to the facts. Please let me know if there is a source that this CDC site is incorrect.
Plus if it was about control why didn't they put it in other vaccines right?Theres no indication there is anything wrong with it. And this isnt brand new, untested science - we've been doing the vaccine thing for a while now. We have it pretty well figured out.
100%And for those members who still live in Seattle, I feel sad for you, but not sad for Seattle. Winter is just around the corner, and I don't see it getting better.
Come on man! You and your facts...Well first that is not entirely correct.
1) This is the first time a mRNA vaccine has been brought to market.
2) This isnt a true vaccine, since it does not contain any element of the virus.
3) and more people have died from this vaccine then all other vaccines combided for the last 10 years.
Yes, VAERS takes the reports, they have no idea if there is a relationship between the symptom reported and causation by the vaccine. Such as, "I have a headache, I got the shot, ergo, the vaccine caused my headache."VAERS accepts reports of adverse events following vaccination without judging the cause or seriousness of the event. VAERS is not designed to determine if a vaccine caused an adverse event..."
I'm looking at similar circumstances as a teacher. Interesting times ahead.My son in law works for Siemens and he's in the process of submitting a religious exemption since they are forcing the FauciForkStick on all employees. Also, had the nurse at my doctor's office tell me she will quit and go work retail if they press the issue. My wife will quit her job at the Surgery Center as well. Sounds like the Great Separation is getting underway.