Platinum Supporter
Gold Supporter
Silver Supporter
- Messages
- 382
- Reactions
- 339
Im kinda new to Milsurps, are low numbers good or bad?
It depends on what milsurp you are talking about and why you are purchasing it.
In the case of Garands, do you want a WW2 (lower # ranges) or Korea (higher # range) vintage rifle? With a WW2 piece do you want prewar or war years? What manufacturer do you want? Do you want/mind a lead dipped receiver (some serial number ranges had a heat treat issue with the heel of the receiver)?
For 1903 or 1903a3 variants there are those that would argue that higher number rifles are better because of heat treating issues with the receivers.
M1 carbines are another animal as well. Some manufacturers, any SN is good because there were so few manufactured (IBM or Rock-ola) and other manufacturers it depends on what you want manufacturing year wise.
If you're just looking for a good shooter, any SN will probably work great. Most have been arsenal rebuilt at least one or more times anyway so most are mixmasters.
If you really take the milsurp plunge it is a deep hole.