- Messages
- 258
- Reactions
- 10
http://www.syracuse.com/news/index.ssf/2010/05/utica_man_79_had_a_grudge_agai.html
Apparently some guy walked into an AT&T store planning to kill 6 people. Luckily there was an off-duty police officer there, so he only managed to critically innjure one employee. This story strikes close to home for me because I work for AT&T. I am really hoping that if the employee survives that he sues the crap out of AT&T for it's "zero-tolerance" weapons policy. It drives me nuts that my employer can deny me the right to carry at work, but is not required to ensure that armed people can't get into company property. If it had not been for an off-duty police officer there would very likely be several people dead because AT&T doesn't allow employees to protect themselves at work.
Apparently some guy walked into an AT&T store planning to kill 6 people. Luckily there was an off-duty police officer there, so he only managed to critically innjure one employee. This story strikes close to home for me because I work for AT&T. I am really hoping that if the employee survives that he sues the crap out of AT&T for it's "zero-tolerance" weapons policy. It drives me nuts that my employer can deny me the right to carry at work, but is not required to ensure that armed people can't get into company property. If it had not been for an off-duty police officer there would very likely be several people dead because AT&T doesn't allow employees to protect themselves at work.