- Messages
- 1,200
- Reactions
- 644
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Looks like they are still collecting sponsorship signatures. Hasn't made the ballot yet.Is this still in the petition phase or what?
Bet that won't be a problem in this State, unfortunately.Looks like they are still collecting sponsorship signatures. Hasn't made the ballot yet.
.
Wow. Not even a buyback proposal. So...let me get this straight...
- The state wants to make a previously legal item illegal
- Then force owners of that item to dispose of it or become a felon?
Has there ever been a time in US Law where the government has done this with any other item? Even automatics were grandfathered in, no?
I'm hoping my measly email to my (democratic) representative will get them to vote this down. But, assuming it does pass, does anyone know if it's even legal? (Is it going to get an injunction and tied up in court and, maybe, struck down?)
Yes, those pesky bump stocks. That's why the ban on them were so bad. Once you agree to let that vampire through the door you'll never get him out. Oh, did I say vampire? I meant government.Wow. Not even a buyback proposal. So...let me get this straight...
- The state wants to make a previously legal item illegal
- Then force owners of that item to dispose of it or become a felon?
Has there ever been a time in US Law where the government has done this with any other item? Even automatics were grandfathered in, no?
There's already a list of gun owners in the CHL databases (for those of us who have done that).There is a whole section about registration, which is not great, but basically renders this whole bill ineffective, or at least limits it to a ban on buying or transferring new 'assault weapons' into your possession.
At the moment there is nothing in that bill that would identify a registered AR as ok or an unregistered one as illegal, except for the database, so unless you are doing something that warrants police attention and confiscation/inspection of your gun in the first place, I'm not seeing how someone would get caught or in trouble for owning an unregistered 'assault weapon'.
Well, it does limit use to private property or purpose built shooting ranges, so hunting or plinking with them on public land would be out, registered or not.There is a whole section about registration, which is not great, but basically renders this whole bill ineffective, or at least limits it to a ban on buying or transferring new 'assault weapons' into your possession.
At the moment there is nothing in that bill that would identify a registered AR as ok or an unregistered one as illegal, except for the database, so unless you are doing something that warrants police attention and confiscation/inspection of your gun in the first place, I'm not seeing how someone would get caught or in trouble for owning an unregistered 'assault weapon'.
Well, it does limit use to private property or purpose built shooting ranges, so hunting or plinking with them on public land would be out, registered or not.