- Messages
- 17,471
- Reactions
- 36,483
Adding for search ... cause I didn't find this thread based on the newspaper headline.
Ribbon - "ribbon gun"
FD munitions
Martin Grier
Ribbon - "ribbon gun"
FD munitions
Martin Grier
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
But with the huge drawback of no adjustable stocks. Which isn't too bad IMO, but I don't wear plates so there's that. I like my AUG, but that's the drawback of bullpups.Bull-pups are far more exciting
Sounds like most issued rifles.What I would like to see in a Infantry rifle ...
( This coming from a former Infantry / LRRP / LRSD solider...)
Simple to use and clean...
Reliable...
A good balance of:
Rounds that can be carried...
Ballistic performance...
And overall weight and "handiness" of carrying...
Capable of good "battlefield accuracy"....
Less of the "Science fiction" gizmo's...
But with the huge drawback of no adjustable stocks. Which isn't too bad IMO, but I don't wear plates so there's that. I like my AUG, but that's the drawback of bullpups.
Sounds like most issued rifles.
But where's the little thingy that flips up in the back."shotgun feature of this sniper-shot, machine-assault gun"
Well there's one I hadn't heard yet
The bolt carrier is why. The purpose of the adjustable stock is less length of rifle and more length of pull for plate carrier.There's no reason a adjustable stock could not be incorporated into the design of a bullpup, it just seems to fly counterintuitive to the design because those who are purchasing bullpups are seeking the shortest OAL without getting into SBR territory, adding something that elongates the stock generally isn't desired. They will likely be the way of the future though eventually as technology improves.