Are background checks back on the table?

Discussion in 'Legal & Political Archive' started by deen_ad, May 7, 2013.

  1. deen_ad

    deen_ad
    Vancouver, WA
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    5,088
    Likes Received:
    1,311

    Gun control: Are background checks back on the table?
     
  2. nilknarf

    nilknarf
    Beaverton
    Active Member

    Messages:
    174
    Likes Received:
    39
    (sigh) more letter writing... don't forget to mention the latest stats on the declining gun homicides and violence since 1993 stuff as fodder for our argument guys...
     
  3. rpatton

    rpatton
    Graham WA
    Member

    Messages:
    221
    Likes Received:
    23
    His name is "Flake"... oh the irony...
     
  4. Father of four

    Father of four
    Portland, Oregon
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    4,311
    Likes Received:
    1,694
    "Are background checks back on the table?" It will probably be a newly adopted Multnomah County ordinance in the near future.
     
  5. solv3nt

    solv3nt
    Portland
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,914
    Likes Received:
    1,300
    Only the State Legislation has the authority to regulate the sale of firearms.

    166.170 State preemption. (1) Except as expressly authorized by state statute, the authority to regulate in any matter whatsoever the sale, acquisition, transfer, ownership, possession, storage, transportation or use of firearms or any element relating to firearms and components thereof, including ammunition, is vested solely in the Legislative Assembly.

    (2) Except as expressly authorized by state statute, no county, city or other municipal corporation or district may enact civil or criminal ordinances[\B], including but not limited to zoning ordinances, to regulate, restrict or prohibit the sale, acquisition, transfer, ownership, possession, storage, transportation or use of firearms or any element relating to firearms and components thereof, including ammunition. Ordinances that are contrary to this subsection are void. [1995 s.s. c.1 §1]
     
  6. Father of four

    Father of four
    Portland, Oregon
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    4,311
    Likes Received:
    1,694
    Mark W. and (deleted member) like this.
  7. solv3nt

    solv3nt
    Portland
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,914
    Likes Received:
    1,300
  8. Father of four

    Father of four
    Portland, Oregon
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    4,311
    Likes Received:
    1,694
    You know buying and selling firearms is probably just a privilege? They can probably take those away from citizens as easily as the open carry privilege was taken away from the innocent citizens.

    Who needs the United States Constitution or the Oregon Constitution when we have city commissioners.
     
  9. BigStick

    BigStick
    Sherwood, OR
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    516
    Likes Received:
    308


    Yeah, but that won't stop the coucil from trying and forcing the people to take it to court. They have a tendancy to keep pushing the envelope and manouvering around the constitution.
     
  10. solv3nt

    solv3nt
    Portland
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,914
    Likes Received:
    1,300
    This particular issue is protected under Oregon Law, and if they force you to court, you force them into a settlement, which is why the Judicial branch is separated from the Legislative and Executive branch of government.
     
  11. deen_ad

    deen_ad
    Vancouver, WA
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    5,088
    Likes Received:
    1,311
    Tell that to Oblammer and Holder (the withholder)!
     
  12. solv3nt

    solv3nt
    Portland
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,914
    Likes Received:
    1,300
    Eric Holder is the Attorney General, and I wouldn't quite classify the Attorney General as part of the Judicial Branch. The Attorney General is the top legal advisor of the United States. The position is NOT tied to the Supreme Court.
     

Share This Page