- Messages
- 287
- Reactions
- 128
To 41Slinger:
No sweat, more than happy to share what I've learned. But, back to keeping it real, now that the laws cited air out the laundry on what CHLs are intended for ("commercial" gun users, like say, professional body guards, security, bank truck operators, private eyes, who knows who else), is this going to be the beginning of a bigger chat about calling CHL pundits to the carpet with the goal of achieving official formal recognition that the public is simply not, nor has it ever been, subject to CHL laws?
I'd be curious to know if Mr. Huffman has a State-issued "license" to exercise his rights too.
No sweat, more than happy to share what I've learned. But, back to keeping it real, now that the laws cited air out the laundry on what CHLs are intended for ("commercial" gun users, like say, professional body guards, security, bank truck operators, private eyes, who knows who else), is this going to be the beginning of a bigger chat about calling CHL pundits to the carpet with the goal of achieving official formal recognition that the public is simply not, nor has it ever been, subject to CHL laws?
I'd be curious to know if Mr. Huffman has a State-issued "license" to exercise his rights too.
