JavaScript is disabled
Our website requires JavaScript to function properly. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser settings before proceeding.
Hmm, $200 a pop extra for every bomb, or missile to arm them up is a drop in the bucket. Don't the average munitions they carry run something like $100k to $500k a pop? The bubblegum of it is the long wait times for NFA approval seems quicker to e- file form 1s and assemble them himself... :D
 
Hmm, $200 a pop extra for every bomb, or missile to arm them up is a drop in the bucket. Don't the average munitions they carry run something like $100k to $500k a pop? The bubblegum of it is the long wait times for NFA approval seems quicker to e- file form 1s and assemble them himself... :D
Again, trusts :D :rolleyes: Sure would be nice if NFA Trusts or certain groups could get in onto that Pentagon 1033 program to acquire certain vehicles.. I know GSA sold some demilitarized AH-1 Cobras to a fire fighting group for fire scout duties with IR scanners and comm equipment?

Edit. Yeah some AH-1Fs converted for US Forest Service's Fire watch duties
 
Some how a bump stock ban seems a lot more ridicule's to me if with enough money you can buy frontline fighters.

The entire NFA is stupid. You can buy a tank, a fighter jet, an attack helicopter... but you can't chop your shotgun barrel down, or put a foregrip on your pistol, or have a machine gun without a permission slip and a stupid amount of money.
 
Some how a bump stock ban seems a lot more ridicule's to me if with enough money you can buy frontline fighters.
The F/A-18A/B models are not current "frontline" fighters, having been superseded by the C/D models which can shoot AIM-120 AMRAAMs, AGM-65 Mavericks, and AGM-84 Harpoon.. also, newer radar and communication and jammer systems are better on the C/D models.
 
The F/A-18A/B models are not current "frontline" fighters, having been superseded by the C/D models which can shoot AIM-120 AMRAAMs, AGM-65 Mavericks, and AGM-84 Harpoon.. also, newer radar and communication and jammer systems are better on the C/D models.
Close enough for me - considering a civilian owns these.
 
Even if they were F4s and A6's - it'd still be superior to many nation's "air forces" and to a point, the F18 in any configuration even the early models still offers superiority over most other nations fighters. It would also have a lot of "Indian, not he Arrow" connotations. A good pilot in an older aircraft will have better odds than a turd in the shinest, newest, bestest fighter.
 
We should be able to acquire M60A3s and M1 Abrams with the 105mm cannons... :rolleyes:

And unmodified or not demilitarized Hummvees, complete with the roof turret rings. :rolleyes:

That said... its interesting to note that the civilian company in question... bought them from Australia not from the Pentagon :rolleyes:

Again, the Pentagon should expand the 1033 program so that other people, not just civilian Law Enforcement agencies can acquire surplus American equipment, vehicles and aircraft.
 
civilian agencies can acquire MRAP armored vehicles and M-ATVs, other wheeled armored vehicles (V-150 in LAPD use..) free of charge from the Pentagon's 1033 program, as well as current body armor plates, weaponry (usually flash, tear gas, smoke grenades in addition to M4 carbines).

So, complaining or being surprised that a civilian can get surplus fighter jets and tanks ring a bit hollow when the police departments have been freely getting surplus vehicles from the Pentagon...
 
civilian agencies can acquire MRAP armored vehicles and M-ATVs, other wheeled armored vehicles (V-150 in LAPD use..) free of charge from the Pentagon's 1033 program, as well as current body armor plates, weaponry (usually flash, tear gas, smoke grenades in addition to M4 carbines).

So, complaining or being surprised that a civilian can get surplus fighter jets and tanks ring a bit hollow when the police departments have been freely getting surplus vehicles from the Pentagon...
Saying the police department has them is different than a civilian individual, this is not the same in my opinion.
 
Still an agency versus an individual - apparently the difference is not clear or is being ignored.
Air USA firm is an individual?:rolleyes:

Granted, the article in OP says he technically owns them, since he owns the company that bought them... and it is not a publicly traded company.

Its very similar to agencies. The agents don't own the vehicles.or gear, the agency does :rolleyes:

The company Air USA owns the aircraft, yes. That the owner of the business is a civilian seems bothersome to you?

Anyways. Yeah, repeal NFA when you've got private companies who holds a bunch of ATF required licenses to outfit the equipment.... right. Like That's gonna happen... :rolleyes:
 

Upcoming Events

Centralia Gun Show
Centralia, WA
Klamath Falls gun show
Klamath Falls, OR
Oregon Arms Collectors April 2024 Gun Show
Portland, OR
Albany Gun Show
Albany, OR

New Resource Reviews

New Classified Ads

Back Top