Was there a reason you bought the standard buffer tube instead of a pistol tube? Looks nice. A lot like the one i built last year,oh heck 2 years ago
I didn't buy the standard buffer tube it was one I had in the parts bin. I am waiting on my Shockwave buffer tube and brace.
I believe the ATF call it "Constructive Intent". Just by having a buffer tube that can support a shoulder stock is grounds enough by being attached.
And just WHY does an AK guy have so many AR mags in the first place? Isn't the Krink, Pap, or Draco pistols good enough for YOU? ^^^This^^^
Why would I do that...100% legal the way it is. Lower was never a rifle and I don't have a rifle stock in possession there for it is ok. I even called the ATF.
Ah, good if they cleared it. Keep agents name handy.. We are just all looking out to keep each other out of trouble.
As most liberals have asked.. I decided to be tolerant and diversify. I am "ammosexual" after all. Ive came to appreciate the AR design over the last few years. After the very first panic I went out and snagged up more USGI amd Pmags than I could use or wear out in my lifetime.
I have built many pistols over time and I have gotten the same question on buffer tubes. I tend to use the A1 tube, buffer and spring as they seem to cycle better on the 11.5 barrel. If you want to use the intent rule then anyone with a rifle and a pistol must have the intent to produce and SBR as all it takes is pushing out 2 pins pulling the lower off the rifle and adding the pistol upper and you now have an SBR so by having both your intent must be to build an unregistered SBR right. Build looks good when you doing the camo on it?
Surprisingly UTG has step their game up in terms of some of the new forearms and AR parts quality. I had a free float forearm and it was actually pretty decent
There fixed the carbine buffer...with a pistol buffer tube and arm brace. You guy's can rest easy now....lol