ALICE capacity

Discussion in 'Off Topic' started by The B, Oct 6, 2011.

  1. The B

    The B
    NW Oregon
    Bronze Supporter Bronze Supporter

    Messages:
    3,971
    Likes Received:
    2,512
    howdy

    been looking for a capacity figure for the GI Large ALICE rucksack... cubic inches or liters.. i can convert. not finding anything on the internets, so i figured i'd check if anybody happens to know here...?

    a weight would be good, too.. if anybody just happens to know- i could always throw mine on the scale, but then i'd have to go get it out of the garage and carry it into the bathroom. you know how that goes...
     
  2. pokerace

    pokerace
    Newberg
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,292
    Likes Received:
    756
    take the scale to the garage
     
  3. ogre

    ogre
    Vancouver, WA
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,984
    Likes Received:
    1,999
    I believe you're looking at 22"x20"x19" or 137 liters.
     
  4. The B

    The B
    NW Oregon
    Bronze Supporter Bronze Supporter

    Messages:
    3,971
    Likes Received:
    2,512
    thats even more effort..


    i've done it that way, but there's something wrong with the conversion. the largest of gigantic expedition packs are 105-110ltrs... and the ALICE isn't as big, let alone bigger, than that. so either the way packs are rated is weird or the above doesn't take into account something.

    basically, at the root of it, i'm looking for a comparison between expedition packs and the ALICE for capacity. im guessing the ALICE would come in around 50ltrish... but its just a huge guess.
     
  5. EMP9596

    EMP9596
    Two Trees West of Camas, WA.
    Active Member

    Messages:
    908
    Likes Received:
    186
  6. moose

    moose
    northwet coast
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,160
    Likes Received:
    354
    Main compartment 18x12x9 or 1,944 cubic inches. Individual pouches 9x5x4 or 180 cubic inches x 3 = 540 cubic inches. That gives us a total of 2,484 cubic inches or about 40 liters.
     
  7. John Gault

    John Gault
    clackamas county
    Bronze Supporter Bronze Supporter

    Messages:
    1,032
    Likes Received:
    659
    I saw these the other day at a local Army/Navy surplus store. What do you guys consider to be the advantages to this style of pack over the more conventional backpackers type pack available. The ridgid frame seems uncomfortable at best. More durable I'm guessing? Molle capable I get it.

    THx
     
  8. The B

    The B
    NW Oregon
    Bronze Supporter Bronze Supporter

    Messages:
    3,971
    Likes Received:
    2,512
    i don't know if it's the only reason, but the main reason the military uses the low-clearance rucks is because taller packs limit head movement too much. even without a k-pot on, there's no way to lift your head up to take aim when in the prone, and with a k-pot, you can't even really glance in the upward.

    the materials used are pretty heavy duty, but there are definitely expedition/sport end packs that are almost, or as, durable.. they can get pretty spendy, as packs go, but civilian packs in general really aren't too bad overall, compared to other mountain equipment. GOOD quality packs can be had for $150-200, easy.

    the ALICE ruck is NOT a bad pack, though... it gets a bad rap from people who hate them because they just hate everything in general.... soldiers.. :-D (shuddup, i was one, once- i know). they're actually pretty light, for being as burly as they are, and do hold bubblegum well. it can be a pain to get it balanced well between hips and shoulders, because of the way they shoot off your back, torquing against your lumber.. but with a quality strap upgrade from Tactical Tailor (like $25, i think... cheep), that problem is mitigated. bonus is, you can fight while wearing it, it's virtually indestructable, and you can get them for $0-$50. and they've got a ton of pockets- most civ bags have few, if any, outside pocket/pouches.
     
  9. The B

    The B
    NW Oregon
    Bronze Supporter Bronze Supporter

    Messages:
    3,971
    Likes Received:
    2,512
    excellent.. so the "dimensions" usually given are basically OD, and not intended to give an idea of capacity...? thanks... that sounds right.
     

Share This Page