JavaScript is disabled
Our website requires JavaScript to function properly. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser settings before proceeding.
Messages
4,073
Reactions
5,344
The Democrats Will Never Confiscate Your Guns. Instead, You'll Hand them Over.
6.5k
Shares
Legal Issues, Opinion, Shooting by billj with 122 Comments


ferg-walking.jpg
(BBC News)

I see and hear a lot of talk about how a national gun registration and/or confiscation would be the trigger that would spark a second American Revolution, as patriots rise up to resist the jackbooted thugs who are going door-to-door taking away people's arms.

I have bad news for everyone who's waiting for national registration or a mass confiscation so they can get their armed rebellion on: a national database of gun owners already exists, and a national confiscation effort will never happen. Ever. Instead, you'll hand over your firearms peacefully. All of them, even the ones you paid cash for to some random guy on Armslist in the dead of night.

ADVERTISING
inRead invented by Teads
Here's a look at how it will play out in our not-too-distant future.

The NSA Knows Who You Are and What You Have[/paste:font]
Second Amendment supporters have been so focused on this one little corner of the Bill of Rights that they've let the Fourth Amendment, which is supposed to protect citizens against unreasonable search and seizure, turn into dead letter.

The surveillance state that got started under Clinton picked up steam under Bush II, and Obama has expanded it even further. The NSA is tracking everyone, all the time, and they're hooked into Facebook, Google, Amazon, and every other piece of web-based software that you've been using to shop for accessories for that AR you paid cash for (which your wife doesn't even know you have).

If you don't believe me, go read this article about just how much detailed info one private company, Facebook, has on you, including your web surfing, shopping, and even your driving and walking habits. Now think about the fact that the NSA is even less constrained by the law (and has way more resources) than Facebook and has access not only to Facebook's detailed profile of you but to profiles created by many other sources, from your credit card company to your health insurance provider.

Oh sure, you may have gotten your hands on a few guns that would be impossible to trace, even by the NSA. Maybe you inherited a long gun from your grandpa, or maybe you met a guy in a gun show parking lot and paid cash and then never Googled anything related to that gun. So here's a question for you: how many people like you exist, and how many of those type guns are suitable for urban combat against AR-15s with state-of-the-art optics? I know which of my guns are probably totally "in the black," and I can't imagine trying to mount an insurgency with any or all of them.

The fact is, most guys who have the kind of hardware suitable for a Civil War 2.0 have been shopping on Gunbroker or Armslist, and/or have filled out FFL paperwork like law-abiding citizens. I seriously doubt there's enough firepower totally hidden from the NSA to sustain any kind of real rebellion.

So the registration ship has sailed. They know what you have and where to find you. Now, here's how they're going to get you to turn it over without a fight.

Hitting You Where It Hurts
When the government outlaws semi-automatic firearms, they won't send cops or troops door-to-door to take them. No, first they'll send out letters saying they know what you have, and that you have to turn it over by a given deadline or face a penalty.

It'll be up to you to prove that you're clean, and that you've handed over everything. They'll have a list, and if they think you're still holding, they'll hit you with asset freezes.

Imagine not being able to get any money out of your bank account or from your credit cards, because your assets are frozen. The federal and state governments already do this if you owe back taxes–a simple letter to your bank, and all of your cards stop working. The bank doesn't care about you, and they don't have the interest or resources to find out if the government's claim against you is bogus. No, they'll just freeze your assets until you get things sorted with the government and the government tells them to unfreeze it all.

The other thing they'll do is take your children.

Do you think Child Protective Services is going to let your children live in a house with potentially dangerous firearms? No way. Your kids will get picked up at school and taken into custody, and a social worker will show up at your door with the cops. Only when a thorough search has been conducted and the authorities are completely satisfied that your property is 100% gun-free will they let you see your little ones again. After all, we have to protect the children.

You're not going to shoot at those cops, either, because then your kids will just end up in the foster system as wards of the state.

Not Nearly Enough for a Revolution
Oh, I'm sure there are folks reading this who are so off-grid that none of the above can touch them. Their guns are totally invisible to the NSA, their assets are all in the form of cash and physically held precious metals, and their kids are home-schooled on a well-guarded ranch.

But is that blessed group big enough to overthrow a determined US government? No, it ain't.

The measures outlined above–a de facto gun registration database courtesy of the NSA and its private-sector allies, asset freezes for non-compliance, and the threat of CPS visits that hold your children hostage–will be sufficient to take well over 90% of the lawfully held guns out of civilian hands, all without firing a single shot.

The bitter truth is this: there will be no confiscation shock troops for you and your buddies to shoot back at, and we will discover too late that the rights-defenders' fantasy–of one, crystal-clear moment when it's time for everyone to rise up as one and take it all back–has been the establishment's biggest ally and freedom's deadliest enemy.

Why do you think they've let you have guns for this long? Because those guns have given you a false sense of security and kept you from doing something truly dangerous, like mass-organizing to pull all your money out of the big banks and to vote out the incumbents.

So if you've sat idly by, fondling your firearms and watching the surveillance state expand while your paycheck shrinks, relying on your gun stash to bail you out when things hit bottom, then the joke's on you. You've already lost the war, and when you hand over your weapons it'll be the last (and mostly symbolic) step in a process of total subjugation that slipped up and swallowed you while you were distracted with building your gun collection.

You may hate me and everything I've said here, but deep down, you know I'm right.

Update: A number of commenters are misreading this article. The headline doesn't say I'll hand them them over — it says you will. And yeah, I'm trolling you a bit with the tone of this piece by saying what you "will" and "won't" do, but it's because I'm trying to slap you awake. The main point that's being made is this: if you're waiting for a door-to-door confiscation, or even a national gun registry, then you'll be waiting forever. Folks who like to talk about a causus belli will need get more creative in coming up with a "bright line", because the ones so many of you are waiting for won't ever appear. If this article has spurred you to think more clearly about what the end of liberty might actually look like, and about what you'll do under scenarios other than the classic door-to-door confiscation scenario, then it has done its job.






The Democrats Will Never Confiscate Your Guns. Instead, You'll Hand them Over. - AllOutdoor.com
 
Of course they could examine your online activity to get a ROUGH idea of what you may or may not own, but I think it's a bit of a stretch to say they could pinpoint your collection to the point of freezing assets and taking your kids if you don't turn in an exact amount they say.

If it got to the point where they are doing those things because you bought a couple AK mags one time on a cc because they were a good deal and you thought you might want an AK someday, there is nothing left to lose.
 
They can come and take some from some of us. Soon or later one of us will go full blown Bundy. Then they will crack down further, and so will we. Many of us will have ours taken away, but enough will be pushed too hard and go Bundy mode at a different time.
 
Yup... Right. The author apparently doesn't understand that the scenario he describes, already is WWIII. Remember the Houston shooter from a few months ago? Now multiply that times every city in the US. Pretty sure that as soon as folks on the net reads that people's kids are being taken from then, the shizzle will go down. So that means that .gov will need to take down the internet first. And of course when that happens, the shizzle will go down.

No matter how you slice it, the soon after the author's scenario comes into play, the shizzle will go down. And once there's an internal war inside our country, the rest of the world will jump in (China, Russia, etc) and poof, WWIII.

-thirtycal
 
The Democrats Will Never Confiscate Your Guns. Instead, You'll Hand them Over.
6.5k
Shares
Legal Issues, Opinion, Shooting by billj with 122 Comments


View attachment 310330
(BBC News)

I see and hear a lot of talk about how a national gun registration and/or confiscation would be the trigger that would spark a second American Revolution, as patriots rise up to resist the jackbooted thugs who are going door-to-door taking away people's arms.

I have bad news for everyone who's waiting for national registration or a mass confiscation so they can get their armed rebellion on: a national database of gun owners already exists, and a national confiscation effort will never happen. Ever. Instead, you'll hand over your firearms peacefully. All of them, even the ones you paid cash for to some random guy on Armslist in the dead of night.

ADVERTISING
inRead invented by Teads
Here's a look at how it will play out in our not-too-distant future.

The NSA Knows Who You Are and What You Have[/paste:font]
Second Amendment supporters have been so focused on this one little corner of the Bill of Rights that they've let the Fourth Amendment, which is supposed to protect citizens against unreasonable search and seizure, turn into dead letter.

The surveillance state that got started under Clinton picked up steam under Bush II, and Obama has expanded it even further. The NSA is tracking everyone, all the time, and they're hooked into Facebook, Google, Amazon, and every other piece of web-based software that you've been using to shop for accessories for that AR you paid cash for (which your wife doesn't even know you have).

If you don't believe me, go read this article about just how much detailed info one private company, Facebook, has on you, including your web surfing, shopping, and even your driving and walking habits. Now think about the fact that the NSA is even less constrained by the law (and has way more resources) than Facebook and has access not only to Facebook's detailed profile of you but to profiles created by many other sources, from your credit card company to your health insurance provider.

Oh sure, you may have gotten your hands on a few guns that would be impossible to trace, even by the NSA. Maybe you inherited a long gun from your grandpa, or maybe you met a guy in a gun show parking lot and paid cash and then never Googled anything related to that gun. So here's a question for you: how many people like you exist, and how many of those type guns are suitable for urban combat against AR-15s with state-of-the-art optics? I know which of my guns are probably totally "in the black," and I can't imagine trying to mount an insurgency with any or all of them.

The fact is, most guys who have the kind of hardware suitable for a Civil War 2.0 have been shopping on Gunbroker or Armslist, and/or have filled out FFL paperwork like law-abiding citizens. I seriously doubt there's enough firepower totally hidden from the NSA to sustain any kind of real rebellion.

So the registration ship has sailed. They know what you have and where to find you. Now, here's how they're going to get you to turn it over without a fight.

Hitting You Where It Hurts
When the government outlaws semi-automatic firearms, they won't send cops or troops door-to-door to take them. No, first they'll send out letters saying they know what you have, and that you have to turn it over by a given deadline or face a penalty.

It'll be up to you to prove that you're clean, and that you've handed over everything. They'll have a list, and if they think you're still holding, they'll hit you with asset freezes.

Imagine not being able to get any money out of your bank account or from your credit cards, because your assets are frozen. The federal and state governments already do this if you owe back taxes–a simple letter to your bank, and all of your cards stop working. The bank doesn't care about you, and they don't have the interest or resources to find out if the government's claim against you is bogus. No, they'll just freeze your assets until you get things sorted with the government and the government tells them to unfreeze it all.

The other thing they'll do is take your children.

Do you think Child Protective Services is going to let your children live in a house with potentially dangerous firearms? No way. Your kids will get picked up at school and taken into custody, and a social worker will show up at your door with the cops. Only when a thorough search has been conducted and the authorities are completely satisfied that your property is 100% gun-free will they let you see your little ones again. After all, we have to protect the children.

You're not going to shoot at those cops, either, because then your kids will just end up in the foster system as wards of the state.

Not Nearly Enough for a Revolution
Oh, I'm sure there are folks reading this who are so off-grid that none of the above can touch them. Their guns are totally invisible to the NSA, their assets are all in the form of cash and physically held precious metals, and their kids are home-schooled on a well-guarded ranch.

But is that blessed group big enough to overthrow a determined US government? No, it ain't.

The measures outlined above–a de facto gun registration database courtesy of the NSA and its private-sector allies, asset freezes for non-compliance, and the threat of CPS visits that hold your children hostage–will be sufficient to take well over 90% of the lawfully held guns out of civilian hands, all without firing a single shot.

The bitter truth is this: there will be no confiscation shock troops for you and your buddies to shoot back at, and we will discover too late that the rights-defenders' fantasy–of one, crystal-clear moment when it's time for everyone to rise up as one and take it all back–has been the establishment's biggest ally and freedom's deadliest enemy.

Why do you think they've let you have guns for this long? Because those guns have given you a false sense of security and kept you from doing something truly dangerous, like mass-organizing to pull all your money out of the big banks and to vote out the incumbents.

So if you've sat idly by, fondling your firearms and watching the surveillance state expand while your paycheck shrinks, relying on your gun stash to bail you out when things hit bottom, then the joke's on you. You've already lost the war, and when you hand over your weapons it'll be the last (and mostly symbolic) step in a process of total subjugation that slipped up and swallowed you while you were distracted with building your gun collection.

You may hate me and everything I've said here, but deep down, you know I'm right.

Update: A number of commenters are misreading this article. The headline doesn't say I'll hand them them over — it says you will. And yeah, I'm trolling you a bit with the tone of this piece by saying what you "will" and "won't" do, but it's because I'm trying to slap you awake. The main point that's being made is this: if you're waiting for a door-to-door confiscation, or even a national gun registry, then you'll be waiting forever. Folks who like to talk about a causus belli will need get more creative in coming up with a "bright line", because the ones so many of you are waiting for won't ever appear. If this article has spurred you to think more clearly about what the end of liberty might actually look like, and about what you'll do under scenarios other than the classic door-to-door confiscation scenario, then it has done its job.






The Democrats Will Never Confiscate Your Guns. Instead, You'll Hand them Over. - AllOutdoor.com
Well that was a nice coffee enema. Lol. (not really lol)
 
There are 100 million gun owners in the USA who own well over 350 million firearm. It is logistically impossible to confiscate them. As to the idea that all these people will willingly give up over 175 billion in assets is just silly. Or that the economy could handle having 175 billion in liquid assets lost.
 
Good to see there is click bait in every realm of the world. They could remove the second amendment and nothing would change. They cannot figure out how to keep drugs out of peoples hands, gun's I imagine would be even harder to do so. Additionally, several states would secede from the union if they did.
 
It is one scenario in a line of many I have read over the years and I will agree that many people will turn over their guns or at least most of them if they thought it would keep them free or should I say alive a bit longer.

But they did not take into consideration that many of us old farts have really nothing to lose and if you threaten my kids who are older and gone from home I will do everything in my power to make you pay and yes my kids and I will and probably die in the process but for a government to do something like threaten us in the first place we were probably going to be killed anyway so might as well fight.

But maybe they did think of this as in this article I posted would put more restrictions on guns owned by us old farts.

Armed and Aging: As Older Americans Own the Most Guns, Should They Face More Gun Controls?

Armed and Aging: As Older Americans Own the Most Guns, Should They Face More Gun Controls?


But when I read these different articles it remind me of stories of the old propaganda machines during world war one and two if we continually tell you cannot win so there is no reason even trying you might over time just believe it and give up without a fight and if any one does put up a fight they are lone wolf extremist, not good guys fighting for their rights.

Our government is always saying we need to change our lives and give up stuff because "we have to do it for the children" so now if we don't give up our guns (in this scenario) then they might use the kid as a threat "After all, we have to protect the children."

So in my opinion you read it then learn what you can from it and realize it is just propaganda so you will freely give up your rights
 
Last Edited:
Interesting idea, forcing us to turn in firearms! I just don't see it happening! Sure, they could lock you out of your bank, seize your assets, make you into a non person, but at that point, things have all ready slid sideways, and YOU and I all ready know whats on the agenda, so ruck up! Any one in uniform becomes a target, and when enough of them go down, the plans come undone, and Rev 2.0 ramps up full!!!
 
That article is ridiculous. I think far more credit and flat out patriotism is due to American gun owners. It basically paints us all as sheeple.
 
Going door to door? Why would they do that? It'd just start a war. No, first it will be the guy across the street, than a couple weeks later it'll be the guy down the road. They wouldn't do it all at once, that would be stupid. They'll do it a little at a time.
 
I will admit, I don't ascribe to everything the author laid out here, but he certainly gives some very good and compelling points.

The 2A is the "last ditch", the rest of them starting from the 10th on down, are first, second, third, etc ditches, and they've all been slowly breached or eroded until they become useless as bulwarks against government overreach. The fact that more isn't being done is a major problem now, and it will only get worse.

The only real counter argument I can present is the one where the NSA whether they want to admit it or not, is so encumbered by all of the information they collect, it's nearly useless. In nearly every case of a mass shooter or terrorist in the US, within a few days every media outlet can look back and point to all the warning signs. It's nearly unheard of that one of these is prevented in a public way, unless it's done violently by the perpetrator badly judging his intended victims, who fight back and overwhelm him.

Violent revolt is the last thing I want, instead I prefer voter and taxpayer revolts that slay our opposition at the ballot box. In so many ways this takes a lot less effort then engaging in a full-time insurgency, but too many of us ignore even that duty. Why does anyone think a violent revolt defending gun rights will go down any differently than the out-right attacks on the 4th and 5th amendments?
 
I dont have money or property any more... lost it all when I became disabled and still battling SSDI. Kids are all grown and living on their own. I would never turn in my firearms. I have some nice lever guns...
 

Upcoming Events

Centralia Gun Show
Centralia, WA
Klamath Falls gun show
Klamath Falls, OR
Oregon Arms Collectors April 2024 Gun Show
Portland, OR
Albany Gun Show
Albany, OR

New Resource Reviews

New Classified Ads

Back Top