JavaScript is disabled
Our website requires JavaScript to function properly. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser settings before proceeding.
Messages
24,507
Reactions
37,116
The relevant part is between 4:30 to 7:30 marks in the video but the entire video is worth watching. I share his view on LEOs violating the oath they took. We need more LEOs to announce that they well refuse to enforce unconstitutional laws.

 
The relevant part is between 4:30 to 7:30 marks in the video but the entire video is worth watching. I share his view on LEOs violating the oath they took. We need more LEOs to announce that they well refuse to enforce unconstitutional laws.

I am not a lawyer but I play one on internet forums. His advice on separating your uppers and lowers to avoid being caught with banned firearms may not work if your State has "parts" clause built in to ban law.
Like this in HB2251:
(G) A part or combination of parts designed or intended to convert a rifle into an assault
rifle as described in paragraphs (a)(D) to (F) of this subsection, or that can be assembled into an assault rifle as described in paragraphs (a)(D) to (F) of this subsection.
 
Last Edited:
I always recomend sending a letter to your Sheriffs and the Sheriff's association in your state! The Sheriff IS the ultimate LEO in the state, and united, they have the final say in all matters of constitutnal law enforcement!
Please take the time to contact them, your voice will be heard
 
Last Edited:
Thank you for posting this. Its almost like the authors of HB2251 watched this before crafting their bill. He is spot on, its not going to get better anytime soon whether youre in Cali., Or., Wa.
 
I always recomend sending a letter to your Sheriffs and the Sheriff's association in your state! The Sheriff IS the ultimate LEO in the state, and united, they have the final say in all matters of constitutnal law enforcement!
Please take the time to contact them, tour voice will be heard

Actually, the state police can come in to any jurisdiction and their enforcement takes precidence.
 
Negative, the Sheriff has the ultimate say, and can even demand thr State and/or feds cease and desist, and to leave his county!
He also has control of any national guard not called up by the POTUS!

Wow, that's not how I understood it. Thanks for the clarification!
 
Yup, an all out attack via legislature to squeeze us tighter and tighter. This is the "boiled frog" technique to rid us of gun ownership! They will eventually make criminal felons out of ALL gun loving upstanding citizenry that choose to hang on to their weapons! People in other countries that used to freely own guns are screaming warnings to us! The questions in this case, what specifics describes "assault"-type pieces? If we are talking any weapon that accepts a magazine (to hold more than X number of rounds), and/or a pistol grip then holy hell! Even plinker 22LR rifles or pistols which are semi-auto have a magazine to accept any functional clip. Come to think of it, even a lot of bolt action 22LR use a clip! The wife and I live on meager retirement with absolutely no room for donating to groups that collectively fight these bas +tards but we still do it. I have helped many persons down on their luck and still do but to a lesser degree now days. Fighting this onslaught on our gun rights takes precedence over everything else! Socialism is the entry drug to "the new world order" with it's slavery to a oligarchy and the evils that come with that. If this continues at the very least we could become broken down into a banana republic with it's dictator! I am way too old to join any physical resistance to this tyranny but I wish I could! In soooo many ways, freedom isn't free! Long live our Constitution the way it's currently written. No changes to amendments 1, 2, 4, & 5! Challenge all who ignore it!
 
One of those who took that the Oath was named Trump and it looks like he isn't paying attention to the details. Many of us took the same Oath and some of IS took it several times.

It doesn't matter how many times someone takes the Oath, what is Important is wether that person is willing to live up to the Letter as well as the Spirit of the Oath.
 
Title 32 of the US Code allows governors of each state to give orders to their state's National Guard. Title 10 of the US Code gives the President the right to give orders to the National Guard and essentially bring them under the umbrella of the federal military forces. While in Title 10 status the National Guard is restricted by the federal Posse Commitatus Act from performing domestic law enforcement. While in Title 32 status the National Guard is not bound by the PCA and can be directed by the governor to perform state law enforcement. A National Guardsman cannot be in both 10 and 32 status at the same time. Interesting fact: the Coast Guard is extremely useful because under Title 14 US Code it can wear two hats concurrently. This is why USCG personnel often augment Title 10 Navy sailors on missions where ship boarding and counter drug operations are likely.
 
Yup, an all out attack via legislature to squeeze us tighter and tighter. This is the "boiled frog" technique to rid us of gun ownership! They will eventually make criminal felons out of ALL gun loving upstanding citizenry that choose to hang on to their weapons!

They will wind up having the papers the anti-2A legislation is written on and have their bodies wrapped with it before they're lowered into the ground.


The U.S.C.G. operated under its own unique congressional charter and is imune to any State authority!


I may be recalling incorrectly, but believe that "back in the day" the USCG operated under the DOT, and (relatively) recently it was moved over to be under the DHS, but could also be placed under DOD like the NG can.
 
The state or local government cannot force the feds out if the feds are enforcing federal law. This is why the California sheriffs are powerless to prevent the ICE agents from walking into the courthouse and arresting the Amish MS-13 members during their DUI cases.
 
If states are prosecuting federal agents for their actions performed under color of federal law (as happened with the revenue agents during prohibition) that criminal case gets removed to federal court so that the state government can't put federal agents in prison without a more neutral forum. You could argue neither forum would be neutral one direction or another, but in 1920's moon shining country I believe most juries would love to send the Revenuers to the state pen. Congress was probably wise to enact that law, otherwise federal officials would be reluctant to do things that the states might not tolerate. Agents who should be standing trial for criminal acts not justified by federal laws still stand trial, but in federal court.
 
A while back my discrete tattoo was spotted at a family function (I almost always wear a sport coat, jeans, and a long sleeved shirt but I don't necessarily button the cuffs... I ain't exactly Mr Drysdale) and was asked by an east coast relative what it meant...
20190311_155958.jpg
... I told them that it meant that I once took an oath to support and defend the Constitution of our United States. That oath's expiration date will be the 2nd set of numbers carved on my tombstone... end of story.

The "thug-life" decorations on the picture got a little out-of-hand... I was having fun and nobody's ever accused me of knowing when to quit.
 

Upcoming Events

Centralia Gun Show
Centralia, WA
Klamath Falls gun show
Klamath Falls, OR
Oregon Arms Collectors April 2024 Gun Show
Portland, OR
Albany Gun Show
Albany, OR

New Resource Reviews

New Classified Ads

Back Top