9/11 truth has to come out

[Blitzkrieg]

They do it by removing nearly all of the interior structure of the building and then removing many of the support columns.The remaining columns are then drilled into and the explosives are planted inside the columns.The work takes months for even a ten story building and literally requires miles of wiring.You want people to believe that all of this could be done in two functional buildings without thousands of employees noticing nothing out of the norm?Laughable.

Watch the video I posted.. there were secret workers working at that building for a long time before 9/11. it was well set up with much motivation and multiple objectives.. mission accomplished because Americans are utterly ignorant of who is behind all this

 

[MrNiceGuy]

For years it has been believed that electric bulbs emitted
light. However, recent information from Bell Labs and
contemplations by keen minds have proven otherwise. The
new idea is that electric bulbs don't emit light, they suck
dark. Thus they now call these bulbs dark suckers. The
dark sucker theory, according to a leading dark sucker
theorist Will Kerslake, proves the existence of dark, that
dark has nearly infinite mass, and that the speed of dark is
just slightly slower than the speed of what is considered
"light".

In a recent interview Mr. Kerslake (a.k.a. BlankRegg) gave
us this view.

"The basis of the dark sucker theory is that electric bulbs
suck dark. Take for example, the dark suckers in the room
where we are. There is less dark right next to them than
there is elsewhere. The larger the dark sucker, the greater
its capacity to suck dark. Dark suckers in a parking lot
have a much greater capacity than the ones in this room.
As with all things, dark suckers don't last forever. Once
they are full of dark, they can no longer suck. This is
proven by the black spot occassionally found on a full dark
sucker. A candle is a primitive dark sucker. A new candle
has a white wick. You will notice that after the first use, the
wick turns black, representing all the dark which has been
sucked into it. If you hold a pencil next to the wick of an
operating candle, the tip will turn black because it got in
the path of the dark flowing into the candle. Unfortunately,
these primitive dark suckers have a very limited range.
There are also portable dark suckers. The bulbs in these
can't handle all of the dark by themselves, and must be
aided by a dark storage unit. When the dark storage unit is
full, it must be either emptied or replaced before the
portable dark sucker can operate again. The typical form
of storage is electricity. The full interaction between
electricity and dark has not fully been explored so I won't
bore you with it hear."

"Dark has mass. When dark goes into a dark sucker,
friction from this mass generates heat. Thus it is not wise to
touch an operating dark sucker. Candles present a special
problem, as the dark must travel into the solid wick instead
of through glass. This generates a great amount of heat.
Thus it can be very dangerous to touch an operating
candle. Huge dark suckers, such as the star which our
planet rotates around, create an enormous amount of heat
as the dark is sucked into the stars core. Unfortunately,
stars just like all other dark suckers do not last
indefinately. When a star has sucked all the dark it can
many different things happen. Many times the star slowly
sucks less and less dark until finally only the core of dark
(developed from many eons of sucking) is all that is left.
Sometimes stars "supernova", in this huge explosion a star
that is near reaching its dark sucking potential will
suddenly suck a huge amount of dark from the surrounding
area. The amount of dark sucked in a supernova is
incredable. The star's sucking force on the dark is so great
that the dark will go straight through planets and other
objects dissentigrating them from the heat created by
friction. This massive amount of dark is more than the star
can handle and the weight will cause the star to implode
and become a 'black hole' (dark emmiter)."

To help explain many of the more complex concepts of the
dark sucker theory BlankRegg has set out a list of many
everday occurances that can be explained through the use
of the dark sucker theory:

Sun spots:

Our sun is a great place to begin to explain the dark sucker
theory. The sun is a star just like many others throughout
the universe. Have you ever seen the Sun spots on the sun?
This is where the sun sucked up so much dark in one spot
that some of the dark got stuck on the surface. These spots
will eventually dissapear as the dark is sucked from the
surface to the core of the sun.

Shadows:

Shadows are made because of dark's mass. Dark cannot be
easily sucked through an object such as a car, tree, person,
so the area "shaded" by the object will appear darker
because less dark has been removed. When a second dark
sucker is introduced at a different angle the dark is
quickly sucked away from the shadow because there is no
longer an object in the way.

Sunglasses:

Sunglasses work on the same basic principle as shadows.
Sunglass don't block out light, the just decrease the amount
of dark that can be sucked from infront of your eyes. This is
why if you look, from the side, at a person with sunglasses
on the skin behind the glasses appears darker.

Sun Tans:

If you remeber that dark has nearly infinite mass then it
must be assumed that everthing must be made at least
partially of dark. The reason that your skin turns darker is
because the sun is sucking dark through you skin. Some of
this dark gets trapped on the surface of your skin making
you darker. The friction caused by the dark flowing
through your body can cause your skin to heat, and
sometimes burn. Hence the longer you're in the sun the
more dark that gets stuck in your skin. A problem arises
when too much dark is sucked through your skin, damage
occurs to the cells. This is damage causes mutation and can
eventually lead to skin cancer.

 

[Akathepriest]

Watch the video I posted.. there were secret workers working at that building for a long time before 9/11. it was well set up with much motivation and multiple objectives.. mission accomplished because Americans are utterly ignorant of who is behind all this

The building fell from the top down and you don't hear any explosions. Try again

 

[LyleLovett666]

So what we're supposed to believe is that a srcret group of workers removed nearly 90% of the interior structure of the two trade centers,while drilling holes into to the remaining support columns and running miles apon miles of wiring.The job would take thousands of people better than eight months,thousands of truck loads of material removed and all of this while people were still working in the towers.This is crazier than the reality of what really happened by a thousand times.

 

[dmancornell]

But an aircraft with jet fuel incapable of melting the structural steel is? BTW if what you say is true then how do the building demolition companies do it? With cutting explosives.. timed to drop them in the building footprint just as we all saw on 9/11

Enough with the jet fuel can't melt steel canard. Heat a rebar to 90% of its melting temperature and I can bend it with my bare hands.

Also I skimmed through OP's video and besides the jet fuel idiocy they spent a half hour yammering about "central supporting columns" (on a steel skeleton building, what?) being demolished because the building went into free fall. Implying any load bearing structure can possibly withstand several thousand tons of weight accelerated by gravity and increasing in mass over time on top of that.

Is it a surprise the video quoted a combat engineer (i.e. not a real engineer) and a handful of academics in unrelated fields? Nothing wrong with healthy skepticism but at least back it up with real evidence.

 

[Burt Gummer]

Watch the video I posted.. there were secret workers working at that building for a long time before 9/11. it was well set up with much motivation and multiple objectives.. mission accomplished because Americans are utterly ignorant of who is behind all this

Willfully ignorant. People wish to believe the things that bring them comfort only. Delusion is believing something despite irrefutable facts to the contrary. The 'official' story is the only one that truly is laughable and defies logic, physics/science and common sense. When one realizes the uncomfortable truth that nearly every war is started with a false flag event it is easy to see that this was just one in a long chain of them.

Many more people realize now that they were lied to and deceived vs say five years ago. But still, the driving force to be accepted by others, to not been seen as different or outside the herd is so powerful that people will accept any nonsense if it means they can be looked at as normal, a good person, 'patriotic', or whatever.

The other ace in the hole of our owners have is their complete lock down of the main stream media. The power of a corrupt and corp/gov controlled media isn't just the power to spread lies or suppress truth. The real power is convincing people that no one else is questioning 'this story' so why are you? You are alone. Confused. Just stop it and come back into the fold. That is its real power. 94% of Americans were firmly against the bailouts for example. However the corp/gov media convinced those opposed that they were a slight percentage at best. Works like a charm.

You can argue point for point hundreds of hard core facts that prove the official story, OBL as the bad guy from the cave, etc, etc, as just nonsense. But going back to delusion, facts do not matter to the deluded so if someone cannot/will not free their mind from preconceived lies; simply put it is a lost cause.

I knew years ago that by now it would be about what it is like is at this point, a few more people that would 'see the light' but that even if many more did, the fear people have of being seen as different would rule the day.

TPTB are way ahead of the psychology game vs the masses. They know our fears, our motivations, inside and out. They knew ANY ridiculous lie, if big enough and told by official sources would be swallowed up like candy on Halloween.

Not to argue details and facts (a futile maneuver), but you have to marvel at the arrogance. Here F93 doesn't make it to building 7 for some unspecified reason. So our owners, via various intelligence agencies, have a building stuffed with Thermite and explosives ready to implode it, but no cause for a free fall collapse. So, at 5:30 they say screw it, and push the button anyway. News sources, pre-handed scripts have already started reporting on the B17 collapse before it happens.

After all, B7 had to go. You can't have it sitting there full of explosives and not push the button can you? Imagine the confidence that takes! You know that the people will accept any lie, so why not, just do it. Incredible and amazing that they have that little respect for the ability of Americans to think for themselves. We have never given them a reason to think otherwise.

Payback unfortunately will come when our owners, in their frenzy to keep the Ponzi alive (the Petrodollar scam) go too far and start real wars. Death and destruction here, right at our feet. Americans unfortunately will learn the hard lesson that you can ignore reality, but not the consequences of ignoring reality.

Some 'facts' and follow up, not that they will do any good. Remember what you are up against. Willful ignorance and delusion. This will be my last and only post on this matter since obviously 'arguing facts' is a dead end.

This will answer the "WHY" equation of 9/11 for those that have an interest in such things (you may have to pause/restart at various stages because You Tube sabotages videos that are telling the real truth):

 

[Akathepriest]

Nah, think about it. What if it all went topside, the government would cease to exist. There was no explosions involved in building 7's collapse. Just fires burning for hours uncontained.

 

[BigNickShooting]

Nah, think about it. What if it all went topside, the government would cease to exist. There was no explosions involved in building 7's collapse. Just fires burning for hours uncontained.

Maybe you remember this?: One Meridian Plaza is a 38-floor skyscraper in Philadelphia that suffered a severe fire on February 23, 1991. The fire started on the 22nd floor and raged for 18 hours, gutting eight floors and causing an estimated $100 million in direct property loss. It was later described by Philadelphia officials as "the most significant fire in this century". The fire caused window breakage, cracking of granite, and failures of spandrel panel connections. 4 Despite the severity and duration of the fire, as evidenced by the damage the building sustained, no part of the building collapsed.

I lived in Philly from 1997 to 2005 and I remember them working to cut down the building floor by floor ...

Read about these, too: http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/compare/fires.html

 

[BigNickShooting]

+1 to BurtGummer

 

[Blitzkrieg]

The building fell from the top down and you don't hear any explosions. Try again

Wrong.. it can be done top down and thermite (which traces were found by independent investigation before the government quickly sent all the metal refuse to China with no tests done) does not explode, it flash burns @ 4000 F and will cut tempered steel like butter

To Burt,.. thanks for taking the time to make worthy and rather lenghty posts that elaborate on what I lack the patience to post.. I am sort of the kind of guy to lead them to water and if they won't drink that's their problem

 

[Blitzkrieg]

Nah, think about it. What if it all went topside, the government would cease to exist. There was no explosions involved in building 7's collapse. Just fires burning for hours uncontained.

Building 7 wasn't hit with anything but a fragment! And what about the built in fire supression systems? Try again

 

[Bigfoot]

Ah, so the xenophobic, western society-hating radicals didn't do it.

The Joo Banksters did. And they brought down Flight 93 in Shanksville Penn too. And they hid the other missing planes and passengers on some Joo island somewhere. Okay. Tell me why again?

 

[Blitzkrieg]

Ah, so the xenophobic, western society-hating radicals didn't do it.

The Joo Banksters did. And they brought down Flight 93 in Shanksville Penn too. And they hid the other missing planes and passengers on some Joo island somewhere. Okay. Tell me why again?

For the 8 billion dollar insurance scam on the towers as well as drawing the West into wars of aggression against their enemies (not ours then, but now they sure are)

 

[SonicBlue03]

I wouldn't expect this read to cure the tinfoil hatters in this thread (I wonder slightly what % of your subset are birthers too) but if you really think 9/11 was staged as a catalyst to pick a fight in the middle east, find someone that can read and have them read <broken link removed> to you.

 

[Akathepriest]

Building 7 wasn't hit with anything but a fragment! And what about the built in fire supression systems? Try again

What of them? You don't think that the surrounding water lines could have been damaged by the explosion or earthquake? These suppression systems are designed to work in an ideal environment. Buildings crumbling are hardly ideal.

 

[Akathepriest]

Wrong.. it can be done top down and thermite (which traces were found by independent investigation before the government quickly sent all the metal refuse to China with no tests done) does not explode, it flash burns @ 4000 F and will cut tempered steel like butter

To Burt,.. thanks for taking the time to make worthy and rather lenghty posts that elaborate on what I lack the patience to post.. I am sort of the kind of guy to lead them to water and if they won't drink that's their problem

Not really surprised they may have found traces of what they thought was thermite. Considering thermite is often Aluminum and Rust....

The fact that people really think this was possible is hilarious, to be able to plan exactly where they placed the explosives and the planes would hit and perfectly coincide.

Apparently conspiracy theorists have never heard of Murphy's Law. TPTB is exempt from that I guess.

 

[SonicBlue03]

What of them? You don't think that the surrounding water lines could have been damaged by the explosion or earthquake? These suppression systems are designed to work in an ideal environment. Buildings crumbling are hardly ideal.

Never let facts get in the way of ones' beliefs.

 

[Jamie6.5]

Not hot enough? Think again.
Even if only half of the fuel aboard those planes survived the impact, the result would be over 530,000 megajoules of heat potential flowing down the interior of what was basically a chimney.
Ever seen a chimney fire? It's basically a static ram-jet stood on end.
When the creosote burns, it is hot enough to destroy the mortar, and melt the firebrick. Is there more potential heat in creosote than JetA? Nope.
And we know this because it's easy to make, and could be powering our cars if there was.

Considering the unique "exoskeletal" construction that formed a monocoque shell used in the towers, and the amount of heat generated when over 20,000 lbs of kerosene (JetA) is burned in a huge chimney, there was more than enough heat to soften the structural members responsible for maintaining structural integrity spanning the walls.

Add to that the structural damage done to the exoskeleton itself by the impacts, and those buildings had NO CHANCE of surviving those crashes.

Now, about the "thermite" residues. Thermite is a blend of aluminum and iron oxide. To find oxidized iron and aluminum residue among the wreckage of a building built of steel beams, and wrapped in aluminum frame windows after destruction by fire, is a slam dunk. To imply that it was thermite at the start of the conflagration is quite a stretch.
Anyone that thinks otherwise would be wise to avoid wearing an aluminum foil hat, as long as they have that steel plate in their head. They might risk spontaneous combustion and burn themselves from the realm of reality.


But aside from ALL of that, how in the he77 could anyone expect to keep a lid on a conspiracy of this magnitude for 10 plus years?
Think of all the people that would have to be involved. Laying charges in the towers? The Pentagon?
And what happened on flight 93? Were all those phone calls in the closing minutes a hoax too?

Jeez you guys, go outside on this beautiful fall day and get some fresh air.
It sounds (reads) like some of you could use the oxygen.

 

[Father of four]

I have a bit of experince with aircraft firefighting, a lot of welding, cutting, burning metal. With that and the almost precise way the buildings collapsed I have to wonder if we are being told all the facts.

Not just 1 building falling straight down but all 3.

 

[WhyteCheddar]

the forces of gravity work to keep structures like this up. they have to be semetrical. remove them and the structure collapses in a semtrical manner. The fact that these building fell in the manner they did is just testament to the fact that they were built properly. Even the Murrow building that sustained its mechanism of injury more from the outside (not a jet fuel fire burning for a long time on the inside) partially collapsed in a controlled manner. Bad as some folks want to believe it, the way the building fell is not evidence of conspiracy.
A conspiracy that frankly makes me want to vomit.