JavaScript is disabled
Our website requires JavaScript to function properly. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser settings before proceeding.
Messages
90
Reactions
112
I was shooting my Browning .40 S&W over the chrono last week and had a case failure. The head of the case was pulled from the case walls and I found it on the ground. The slide cycled and stripped a new round from the magazine but it obviously couldn't chamber. There wasn't any damage to the Browning and I was able to keep shooting. I was shooting 180 Gr Laser Cast and 5.5 Gr. Unique. What's interesting is we were shooting again on Sat and the same thing happened in a Beretta 96FS only this time the tip of the extractor was broken and lodged between the extractor and the slide. Same load as before. The brass was PMC that I had picked up at a gun show in the Expo Center. I guess I'm looking for some input on the PMC brass. Has anybody encountered this issue?
 
I was shooting my Browning .40 S&W over the chrono last week and had a case failure. The head of the case was pulled from the case walls and I found it on the ground. The slide cycled and stripped a new round from the magazine but it obviously couldn't chamber. There wasn't any damage to the Browning and I was able to keep shooting. I was shooting 180 Gr Laser Cast and 5.5 Gr. Unique. What's interesting is we were shooting again on Sat and the same thing happened in a Beretta 96FS only this time the tip of the extractor was broken and lodged between the extractor and the slide. Same load as before. The brass was PMC that I had picked up at a gun show in the Expo Center. I guess I'm looking for some input on the PMC brass. Has anybody encountered this issue?

I've shot a lot of reloaded PMC .40 and never had an issue. A lot of .40 reloads period some mild some hot and no issues. Were they the same batch of reloads?
 
I've shot a lot of reloaded PMC .40 and never had an issue. A lot of .40 reloads period some mild some hot and no issues. Were they the same batch of reloads?

These were both loaded with same lot powder and primers and the bullets were from the same box but they were loaded at different times. I've started inspecting the remaining cases including looking in the inside with a bore light and I've found several so far that have a very abrupt transition from the case head to the case wall, it's almost like a 90 degree angle. It looks like there's less material there. My plan is to go through the entire batch and seperate out any of those and section a few of them as well as some of the others. I'm very reluctant to load any more of them, brass is a lot cheaper to replace than a Browning.
 
The older generation glocks had a badly unsupported area of the cartridge... This improved with the later generations...

These were likely police range pickup brass... And some police departments still have earlier generation glocks...

This is not a glock bashing statement, just repeating established fact..
Check for a bulge at the base of the brass...

http://www.glockpost.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1561

I think the wrinkle is what you are referring to
 
It strikes me this probably was not a glock related issue, and was more likely a result of defectively produced, or excessively used brass. Your loads don't seem excessive, but typically for a pistol cartridge there is at least a .050" radius where the case head meets the case web, and also .40 brass usually has a rather abrupt web compared to other cartridges such as 9mm or .45. Even then, it seems there is more that meets the eye here...
 
The whole Notion of it being "glock" as the problem child, is due to lack of knowledge on the subject.

ANYONE who uses the Modified Browning system, AKA. the Swinging-Link type action; has an unsupported chamber. The question becomes "HOW" un-supported. Glock has LESS support than some, more than others. As long as your components are WITHIN spec, AND so are your PRESSURES; there is no issue regardless of pistol maker.

The Beretta 96 does NOT use this type of action, so the fact that you had the same separation issue in it; tells you that something else is wrong. As AMP said, there is something else( or several things) at play here. Either your powder has aged badly, and/or the cases have an issue. Possibly a bad batch, or have been horribly overloaded previously.
 
Response #5 indicated the problem is bad brass--insufficient web transition area.
Definitely inspect and scrap all such brass. Perhaps you can cut a case down and photograph the web and compare to another case. This may be information worth getting out to the "public."
My question is along the line of: if you had one failure with a reload, why did you go back to shooting it?
 
Response #5 indicated the problem is bad brass--insufficient web transition area.
Definitely inspect and scrap all such brass. Perhaps you can cut a case down and photograph the web and compare to another case. This may be information worth getting out to the "public."
My question is along the line of: if you had one failure with a reload, why did you go back to shooting it?
In looking back on it now, it probably wasn't the correct course of action, especially in light of the second failure several days later. I've nearly completed inspecting the inside of the cases and I've found at least 10% that I consider suspect. I will be sectioning some and taking pics. This weekend I'll have to go through my loaded ammo and pull out the PMC's as well as go through the fired cases from the last two outings. I'll post the pics when I get them.
 
I may be wrong, but isn't PMC Koren ? If so I have heard of this happening before with new ammo. As far as Glocks go, in all the years I've own my 23 ( for those that don't know is a 40 ) I've had one problem and I fixed it when I swaped out the barrel and went with Lone Wolf.
 
I may be wrong, but isn't PMC Koren ?

Kind of a Yes and No answer here. The PMC Corporation is a Korean company but they also own PMX Precision Metals which is their major supplier of the brass alloy for their cases. PMC is essentially the "Lake City" of Korea and ships military ammo all over the world.

Actually, I have had great luck with their cases in 9mm and 5.56/.223. If I had to pick a "problem case" for pistol calibers it would most likely be Federals. They seem to start leaking through the primers (loose pocket) sooner than most.
 
Kind of a Yes and No answer here. The PMC Corporation is a Korean company but they also own PMX Precision Metals which is their major supplier of the brass alloy for their cases. PMC is essentially the "Lake City" of Korea and ships military ammo all over the world.

Actually, I have had great luck with their cases in 9mm and 5.56/.223. If I had to pick a "problem case" for pistol calibers it would most likely be Federals. They seem to start leaking through the primers (loose pocket) sooner than most.

I too like the 223/5.56 PMC, haven't really formed an opinion on the PMC 40s yet. I've loaded and shot a few thousand .40 for my 3rd gen 22 and 23 and haven't had any failures in any casings yet. I'm just glad there aren't any military crimps or sealants in any of the range pickups I find. :D
 

Upcoming Events

Redmond Gun Show
Redmond, OR
Klamath Falls gun show
Klamath Falls, OR
Centralia Gun Show
Centralia, WA

New Resource Reviews

New Classified Ads

Back Top