JavaScript is disabled
Our website requires JavaScript to function properly. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser settings before proceeding.

.32 the caliber time has passed by?

  • No way, José! Very much viable, I particularly like [fill in the blank] ...

    Votes: 18 36.7%
  • Might be a little over dramatic, but yah, it has fallen by the wayside. Still a workable option.

    Votes: 11 22.4%
  • Pretty much. The thirty-two is a niché item, at best.

    Votes: 5 10.2%
  • Of course. De facto dead. Why are we having this conversation?

    Votes: 1 2.0%
  • He got a 32 gun in his pocket for fun / He got a razor in his shoe

    Votes: 14 28.6%

  • Total voters
    49
I think with the new 'ultimate carry' SW 432/632 revolvers, we're going to see a resurgence in the .32 caliber. One can't deny the advantages of .32 over .38 for a revolver. Admittedly, if .32 were more common I'd probably start carrying it but I shoot often enough that consistently finding .32 ammo would be a burden, its already hard enough to find .38 ammo that doesn't cost an arm and a leg.

 
ACP case topped with a 125gr Sierra MatchKing.
View attachment 1923751
Proprietary developers of the .251 Washington are considering a patent infringement suit at this very moment.

1722736398302.jpeg
 
Last Edited:
The 32 H&R Magnum has less blast and recoil than the 38 Special, but gives up very little in ballistic performance, and in the J frame sized pistols, carries 6 rounds instead of the usual 5.

Also, the old 32 S&W Long round passes the FBI ballistic tests.
Excellent point. Less recoil and an extra round in the J frame class isn't bad at all.

And interesting on the .32 S&W Long with respect to FBI guidelines. Time has passed that one by, but I always thought it got short shrift. I used to shoot a bit of it in a M1895 Nagant many moons ago and see classic Smiths in said from time to time.
 
Excellent point. Less recoil and an extra round in the J frame class isn't bad at all.

And interesting on the .32 S&W Long with respect to FBI guidelines. Time has passed that one by, but I always thought it got short shrift. I used to shoot a bit of it in a M1895 Nagant many moons ago and see classic Smiths in said from time to time.
I didn't think of shooting it in a nagant… I have a .32 acp conversion cylinder, but 32long in a regular cylinder makes sense. ( I have a Czarist 1901 and a Soviet 1944)
 
I have a 1903 Hand Eject S&W in .32 Long that is a peach at the range. I do need to do something about the excessive cylinder gap.

Followed that with an SP101 4.2" for which I load .32 H&R Mags, and later an LCR in .327 that has H&R ammo in it as well. I think the 6-shot .32 LCR is a perfect pocket gun. The .32s are cheap and easy ammo to reload.
 
Forget 12 days, wasn't even two hours on the podium. Lame.
Yah, I've noticed those 1990s vintage, full-sized, .32 H&R Magnum Smiths go for a pretty penny. They are very nice offerings, but I'm not entirely sure why they go so high. I've seen some well north of $3,000.

Parenthetically, I kind of kick myself for not picking up an Alfa Proj 761 in .32 S&W Long when they were plentiful and reasonably priced at Czechpoint USA.

1723347809206.png
 
Started with an I frame 32 S&W Long, then a Ruger 32 H&R/32-20 and then two Model 16s 4 and 6" in the past 6 weeks.

32s are good for us old blue collar gents who hands are to arthritic from using them.
 

Upcoming Events

Liberty Firearms & Blade Expo
  • Canby, OR
Hunter Sight In Days
  • Colton, OR
Oregon Arms Collectors September 2024 Gun Show
  • Portland, OR
Prs 22 Regional Finaly
  • Eagle Creek, OR
Roseburg Rod and Gun Club Gun Show
  • Roseburg, OR

New Classified Ads

Back Top