- Messages
- 4,251
- Reactions
- 1,850
I prefer 30-06. But I would'nt throw away the .308 either.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hello every one noobie here, Just wanted to say that in a semi auto platform I prefer the .308, but in a bolt gun I'd go with the .30-06.
And then there are those of us that just think it's silly. But only because 2-3 of these threads show up EVERY YEAR on every gun/hunting board I have ever visited.its funny when people get up in arms about a discussion. if you dont like the thread keep your mouth shut and dont reply. i believe this is "general firearms discussion". i was simply gathering some opinions on what some people would prefer and why.
Deer are tougher today than they were 50 years ago. You WILL need that 100fps IF you can even hit one. Are you sure you don't want a magnum cartridge? It's the only way to be sure.
Exactly. None of the deer shot with any handgun, 243, 6mm, 30-30, 32-30, or anything else are actually dead. If it doesn't say "Mag" at the end, it can't possibly kill a "modern" deer.
The modern deer has developed a layer of a natural forming kevlar. Large caliber, heavy bullets (premium, of course) are required. I'm going to write to the DNR and demand that tungsten core be required for anything larger than paper targets.
Further, one can't possibly hit, much less kill, a deer without a high magnification, adjustable parallax, high end optic with lots and lots of lines, dots, and/or circles. Until such things were invented, hunting was just an excuse to get away for the day/weekend.
how about a .17/50bmg?
damn deer must have been taking over the country until magnums and the hubble rifle scope came along. thank god for armchair hunters
But apparently searching for common topics like this doesn't work for some. They feel compelled to start it up all over again. Use the search function and save the bandwidth.