 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |  |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
FBI Analysis on PA Police Shootout
WARNING: THE BELOW LINK CONTAINS VERY GRAPHIC AUTOPSY PHOTOS AND SHOULD BE VIEWED WITH DISCRETION.
As most know, shot placement, not caliber or weapon, is everything in a gunfight and always the key to stopping a threat effectively. Determined individuals can sustain many gunshot wounds in area that produce great pain and continue to fight a long time, even without the aid of drugs or alcohol.
http://concealedcarryholsters.org/wp...e-Shootout.pdf
Yup. I know real well about that one.Originally Posted by titsonritz
One reason I posted this analysis is all the comments I read about people assuming that an assailant will stop and run after being shot (it just doesn't work that way people) and they never “feel out-gunned” while packing a snub nose revolver. If you must carry such a weapon carry two of them for the NY reload capability or better yet confine them to the role they play best, a BUG.
Why the lack of penetration of the .40s? The write up never addresses this. And the slugs in the xray look partially expanded except the throat shot.
The answer to your penetration question is in the article;
"It is impossible for a .40 S&W 180gr JHP ammunition to expand with only 1in. or less penetration in a human body."
A bullet takes time to expand, and there's not enough time in the distance of 1in. to do that.
Train at the speed of a gunfight.
Actually, it's both. A .22 in the heart or head might not do anything but piss off your assailant while a .45 could sever a hand and make it useless. The subject had the mindset of winning and killing cops- or to die trying. The pain of the shots were ignored by his will to continue.
Can anyone sit here and state that someone hit in the leg with a .50AE has a better chance of surviving than someone hit in the chest with a .9mm? No. What I took from the report is that all bullets have their limitations. The .40 S&W was thought to be a perfect cure all for capacity, take down and penetration...but it looks like if you throw in some light cover (i.e. vehicle glass) then 180gr Speer Gold Dot, .40 cals turn into little more than big pellets (hence the 1in penetration in the neck but a through-and-through on his right arm and arm bone). This investigation made me more interested in bullets that go faster, but are decent sized (i.e. .357 sig) or bigger bullets that go faster (i.e. 10mm) and the need for FMJ to go through light cover.
Know the limitations of your bullets. That is what I took from the investigation. Any FBI analysis of the .40 S&W is probably just going to be a justification for keeping it as current duty use instead of going back to the 10mm.
I too would like an explanation as to the lack of penetration..which..from reading the attached report several times..is not addressed.. True..the lack of penetration explains lack of expansion.. It does state..near the bottom of the report..which sadly..is covered up..that there was a second incident..where vehicle glass was a factor.. But..concerning this incident..it states the only barrier was a down jacket and a t-shirt.. So..why only 1" of penetration? That's absolutely pathetic.. Might as well have been armed with slingshots...
This is not the ONLY Incident where 40sw has failed! 1" penetration in the throat, at what distance 200 yards?
I'll stick with my 9mm FMJ
"Can anyone sit here and state that someone hit in the leg with a .50AE has a better chance of surviving than someone hit in the chest with a .9mm? "
That is the wrong question
The right question should be:
"Can anyone sit here and state that someone hit in the leg with a .50AE has a better chance of killing his oponent than someone hit in the chest with a 9mm."
The answer, of course, is yes!
Carry as much gun as you can, caliber, numbers of guns, etc.
The sickest feeling you may feel is when your gun runs dry in an incident.
Shot placement
Don't expect the assailant to die after being hit (you don't want to either).
Don't rely on handgun bullet expansion at limited velocities.
SHOT PLACEMENT
My question is not answered in the text. WHY only 1" of penetration?
=============================================
Windshield.
It is my understanding the perpetrator received glancing shots while positioned 90 degrees to that particular LEO. It is pretty common to assume an adversary would be squared up like the silhouettes we all shot, but as often occurs on the street that is typically not the case, thus the FBI requirement of 12” of penetration.
I believe this report is neither damning the 40 S&W or 5.56 nor the particular loads used but rather acknowledging the fact that a determined human being is a very tough target and that shot placement is key also that a firearm with a high round count provides the ability to continue shooting increasing the chances of making that good shot under the less than ideal conditions faced in the real world.
My Summary after review of the facts and photos. Gold Dot makes you stronger. TAP doesn't.
A couple of thoughts:
The data from just one shooting incident shouldn't be over-emphasized, bullets (and people) often do weird things. It takes large volumes of data to spot real trends.
Shot placement sounds great in theory but does in really mean much when you are trying to hit a moving target while under fire? I think most folks just aim center of mass and hope for hits of any kind in a close quarter gun fight.
You are correct on both counts.
My thoughts: Don't get tattoos that foresee the future.
Do not argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.
Yeah you caught that too. The guy definitely wins the most fitting tattoo of the day award.
lol
When the report first came out I made up my mind to switch all my ammo to Hornady TAP.
Again this thread is not intended to be about calibers or round design but rather the fact that human targets are very tough and dedicated humans are even tougher. My AK is loaded with 123 gr 7.62x39 TAP V-Max, my Glock 19 is loaded with 124 gr. +p LE Gold Dots and I have full confidence in both my choices. At least as much confidence that is possible; there are no guarantees with any man portable weapon.
A ghetto ballistic vest. And all this time I thought the bangers wore down jackets in the summer because of style or drug induced problems with core temperature. This could be a marketing idea for jacket makers.
I practice visualising where the spine is when I'm in public because that's what my target would be and I know that won't have time to figure in body position and angle when the stress is on.
Posting Permissions
10Likes
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks