
Originally Posted by
CatCow
....I consider the threat to be highly overstated. It would be difficult or impossible for anyone but a major power to put a device either into orbit or into a suborbital position still capable of generating a proper EMP(Starfish Prime detonated at a height of 250 miles over the Pacific Ocean) - a disguised orbital device seems more likely, as launching an ICBM over your enemy is going to produce a counterattack that will wipe you out. Terrorists just don't have these kinds of capabilities - the chances of them obtaining a useable nuclear device are alarming, but they are much more likely to use some sort of dirty bomb or easily produced chem/bio weapon, if they bother with WMD's at all. WMD's are expensive and complicated, and terrorist tactics typically require low cost and simplicity - think cell-phone activated IED's in Iraq or Afghanistan, home-made rockets and suicide bombers in Israel and the like. 9/11 was an unusually complex attack.
That's not to say that EMP protection is not important, as there are natural sources - lightning strikes and solar storms. Solar storms aren't likely to physically damage electronics, although the power grid is vulnerable to collapse, and lightning is highly localized in effect, and if it hits EMP is likely the last of your worries.
Bookmarks