Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 25
Like Tree12Likes

Thread: Homeland Security officers patrolling MAX trains at random

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Hillsboro, OR
    Posts
    433

    Default Homeland Security officers patrolling MAX trains at random


  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    SW Washington
    Posts
    558

    Default

    They must have heard some people are CCing. We can't have people unfairly more prepared to avoid being a victim now, just think of the poor muggers not being able to support their habit, and how will the drug dealers and fences stay in business if we let you defend yourself?
    borrowedsig and Burt Gummer like this.

  3. #3
    Moderator deadeye's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    albany
    Posts
    4,308





    Default

    Papers Please........one more reason to avoid Portland.
    "They'll get my rifle when they pry it from my cold dead hands"

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Portland, OR
    Posts
    313

    Default

    Hrm, if they were patrolling more than just the Airport MAX line (i.e. the lines that go to Hillsboro or Gresham or Clackamas,) I'd consider open carrying in the open-carry cities MAX passes through, just to mess with them. (Yes, I *COULD* open carry anyway as a CHL holder, but then I'd have to "show papers" to prove I was legally open carrying - in the open-carry-okay cities, I could tell them (politely) to buzz off.)

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Troutdale or nowhere near 82nd and Flavel
    Posts
    716

    Default

    I can wait for another max train beating video to go viral on the internet. I am glad to have someone besides criminals patrolling the max line.
    Sling Blade likes this.

  6. #6
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Hillsboro, OR
    Posts
    3,779


    Default

    IMO this whole thing about having DHS roving checkpoints and heightened visibility is an attempt to desensitize people to having their constitutioal right to be secure from illegal searches violated. This is one of the first of many steps towards tyranny in this country. I would hope people would stand up and say no to this crap, but I doubt enough will do so to stop it.

    Welcome to the police state.
    Last edited by Cougfan2; 01-23-2012 at 05:03 PM. Reason: misspelled violated
    borrowedsig, Redcap, timac and 3 others like this.
    "Gun control is like trying to reduce drunk driving by making it tougher for sober people to own cars."

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Beaverton, OR
    Posts
    924

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cougfan2 View Post
    IMO this whole thing about having DHS roving checkpoints and heightened visibility is an attempt to desensitize people to having their constitutioal right to be secure from illegal searches violoated. This is one of the first of many steps towards tyranny in this country. I would hope people would stand up and say no to this crap, but I doubt enough will do so to stop it.

    Welcome to the police state.
    And when people do say no:


  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Hillsboro, OR
    Posts
    433

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dmancornell View Post
    And when people do say no:
    Instead of a cop who appears to of had a rough day yelling at you though, you get 4 feds in ninja suits screaming at you and proning you out on the floor of a dirty max car.

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Beaverton
    Posts
    194

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cougfan2 View Post
    IMO this whole thing about having DHS roving checkpoints and heightened visibility is an attempt to desensitize people to having their constitutioal right to be secure from illegal searches violoated. This is one of the first of many steps towards tyranny in this country. I would hope people would stand up and say no to this crap, but I doubt enough will do so to stop it.

    Welcome to the police state.
    So true,throw a frog in boiling water and he will quickly jump out,bring the same frog to a slow boil and he dont even know he's dying.
    So it is with D.H.S.putting their nazi's in the public eye,in 2 years people will be desensitized to them and never think about it when their surrounded by D.H.S.and fema.

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Beaverton
    Posts
    194

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dmancornell View Post
    And when people do say no:

    This is a funny video,it's not real though,its swoosh!
    These guys are buddies,can you imagine if the cops station witnessed that?he would be put on leave for mental evaluation.

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    sequim
    Posts
    3,286

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CharonPDX View Post
    Hrm, if they were patrolling more than just the Airport MAX line (i.e. the lines that go to Hillsboro or Gresham or Clackamas,) I'd consider open carrying in the open-carry cities MAX passes through, just to mess with them. (Yes, I *COULD* open carry anyway as a CHL holder, but then I'd have to "show papers" to prove I was legally open carrying - in the open-carry-okay cities, I could tell them (politely) to buzz off.)
    Oh boy,another rude Open carrier making the rest of the gun people look stupid.

    Yeah yeah I can tell them to just buzz off.

    no sense in being adult about it huh?

  12. #12
    Senior Member skydiver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Gresham, OR
    Posts
    945

    Default

    I'm sure this is in some other posting, but can an Oregon resident with an valid CHL carry concealed on Max?

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Portland Area
    Posts
    279

    Default

    while they are riding the transit - bus, train, what ever, hopefully they will tell these inconsiderate, rude, cocky, waste of tax payers school money funding idiots to shut the bubblegum up, act like a respectable individual, treat others kindly, respect other riders peace of mind, and sit in their seat and don't act like a piece of bubblegum that should be pistol whipped and sent to a island with others that feel they are also the high and mighty.

    lol, that was a rant
    sheepdip likes this.

  14. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    198

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by skydiver View Post
    I'm sure this is in some other posting, but can an Oregon resident with an valid CHL carry concealed on Max?
    Yes. There is nothing prohibiting an individual with a valid CHL from carrying on any of Trimet vehicles.
    Redcap likes this.

  15. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Hillsboro
    Posts
    616

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hardwood floor guy View Post
    This is a funny video,it's not real though,its swoosh!
    These guys are buddies,can you imagine if the cops station witnessed that?he would be put on leave for mental evaluation.
    ================================================

    What is swoosh?

  16. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    OR
    Posts
    2,171

    Default

    Trimet's code for anyone interested. I really like this part: "Where possession of such weapons cannot be prohibited by law". I believe that would be everywhere. They make it sound like they have the ability to regulate firearms possession.

    http://trimet.org/pdfs/code/TriMet_Code_Chapter_28.pdf
    D. Prohibited Risks to Transit System Security and Order:
    (2) Weapons: No person, except a peace officer, shall bring or carry aboard a District Vehicle any firearm, knife (except a folding knife with a blade less than 3 ½ inches in length), or any other instrument, article, device, material or substance specifically designed for, or attempted to be used to, inflict or cause bodily harm to another, except in accordance with administrative rules as may be promulgated by the General Manager or otherwise provided by law. Where possession of such weapons cannot be prohibited by law, a person in possession of a weapon may not display or carry the weapon in a manner which is likely to result in fear or alarm by other persons or District employees.

  17. #17
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Clackamas County
    Posts
    296

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by skydiver View Post
    I'm sure this is in some other posting, but can an Oregon resident with an valid CHL carry concealed on Max?
    Yes, but it is frowned upon.

  18. #18
    Captain Limpwrist Nutty4Guns's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Portland
    Posts
    451

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Natty Bumpo View Post
    Yes, but it is frowned upon.
    Yeah, by Tri-Met! Big deal.
    Currently accepting donations of guns and ammo. Multiple calibers accepted.

  19. #19
    Senior Member sheepdip's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Redland
    Posts
    986

    Default

    #15 me too,what is swoosh? unfortunately the tri-met security cops are just like most private security companys. mostly comprised of guys that cant be real cops. i think for the most part this includes, port of portland, T.S.A. dept of H.L.S., F.B.I., C.I.A.. I lived in totem lake Wa. for a couple years, the guy above us in the fourplex was a U.S. marshal. wife beating piece of crap like i have never seen. chicken scat sob. i called him out once for beating his wife, guess what i got in return? U.S. marshals service up my butt. they looked at everything i had ever done. guess what? the day we moved out of that complex that sob was kicking his wifes a$$ again. it sucked because she was a really nice woman. i hope she is still alive. if not i am sure his agency would cover it up.

    sorry didnt mean to get off topic.

  20. #20
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Portland, OR
    Posts
    313

    Default

    Sorry, I didn't mean to come across as an arrogant open-carrier. I have personally never carried openly in the Portland Metro area - except at gun-friendly indoor events (gun shows, for example.)

    But this chaps me. I'm all for more real security, but transit police (or the city/county police the train/bus is in at the time.) This is bull-puckey. Federal Homeland Security agents?

    And I did mean "politely" tell them they had no justification - "buzz off" was meant to be the colloquialism, not the actual phrase. (Yeah, even when I know the law enforcement officer is wrong, I am always perfectly polite and compliant - I do *NOT* want to be shot due to a misunderstanding.)

    To get back on topic - yeah, Tri-Met tries to claim that they have the authority to bar weapons - but Oregon state law is clear - only cities and counties can regulate loaded open carry. And even then, CHL holders are exempt from local regulations. Transit districts have *ZERO* firearm regulatory power. Inside a bus shelter/MAX station, you may have some potential gray areas about "public buildings" and open carry, but again, a CHL holder is exempt per ORS. (But if you're not sure - contact a lawyer, don't trust my word on it. I am just a random person on the internet, after all...)

    I concealed carry on Tri-Met every day.
    mjbskwim likes this.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •