Thread: Read this! Silencer rights imposed!!!!!!!

After reading thru this story I wonder why Washingtoners vote for folks they do, I can't think for the life of me the value in our elected officials and why especially those of whom believe in our second amendment rights vote for the rascals out there who follow along the Pelosi type thinking.
I am a member of the NRA and would love to see a more aggressive movement towards rogue cops whom think they are the only ones who should have arms, these men and women should be fired and made an example of maybe the NRA needs to take a few Kudos from the likes of the ACLU and make sure these men and women are held to the law.

Originally Posted by Buddymack

After reading thru this story I wonder why Washingtoners vote for folks they do

Two words...

King County.

Originally Posted by Buddymack

After reading thru this story I wonder why Washingtoners vote for folks they do

Originally Posted by wired

Two words...

King County.

OR more appropriately... BLUE CITIES

Originally Posted by ZeroRing

OR more appropriately... BLUE CITIES

LOL I guess that is all the better reason for us to stick together, shoot together and support each other ....

We got Zombies at 12 o'clock

Originally Posted by Ranb

Representatives Finn and Pedersen have both agreed to meet with me to discuss bill 1604. They have not set a date though. The best thing we can do for now is to write to the people on the Judiciary committee, especially Pedersen. No one else maters right now. Unless Pedersen allows the bill to get a hearing, it will never make it out of committee to the House for a vote.

As far as I know, no one on the Judiciary committee has received much e-mail about bill 1604. This needs to change or else we will never be able to use our silencers in WA.

Ranb

I just posted my draft letter in the NFA forum. Although maybe I should have posted it in legal and political. Anyway, please let me know what you think.

Originally Posted by Buddymack

LOL I guess that is all the better reason for us to stick together, shoot together and support each other ....

We got Zombies at 12 o'clock

Back to back, got yer 6

Originally Posted by Blitzkrieg

Back to back, got yer 6

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-TC2xTCb_GU

Originally Posted by rpatton

The OP mentioned a couple of times in this thread that they never used the suppressors nor did they intend to. I'm thinking that somewhere along the line you are going to have to answer the question...If you had no INTENT to use them, then why did you have them with you while shooting? As much as you would rather not have to get a lawyer, this is a question they could help answer or dodge.

Personally, if I had suppressor(s) with me while shooting, I know I would at the very least be tempted, so the intent question is one you should prepare for. At least I think so.

ATF would not have approved the form four had it put the person in violation of state law. In WA you can own as many silencers as you can afford. You can do anything you want with them, up to and including screwing them on to the end of your barrel. The only Washington crime associated with a suppressor is that it is a gross misdemeanor to "USE" the device.

There is no violation of "intent", only USE. The AG has determined that placing a legally owned suppressor onto your firearm does NOT constitute USE. You must fire the gun with suppressor attached to have committed the misdemeanor. One could argue that mere possession shows "INTENT" to use. That means you’re in violation the day the suppressor is transferred to you from the dealer.

Buying alcohol is not intent to commit drunk driving; legally owning a suppressor is not intent to "USE" it.

Last, since the use is a misdemeanor, it must have been committed in the officer’s presence.