Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 38 of 38
Like Tree2Likes

Thread: Osp wants to raise instant check fee

  1. #21
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Wilsonville, Oregon, United States
    Posts
    96

    Default

    We won't have any updates until the Governor's Recommended Budget is released on February 1, 2011. It might be raised a few bucks, and most likely be raised more than a few bucks.

  2. #22
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Battle Ground
    Posts
    1,710

    Default

    I would rather pay that than to pay tax for WA residents.

  3. #23
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Hillsboro
    Posts
    184

    Default

    The proposed raise is too much, an increase of five dollars is a reasonable and just amount for the times we live in. I think the background check should last for 30 days also, not imposed on another firearm purchase within 30 days.. My2cents

  4. #24
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Thurston County
    Posts
    1,086

    Default

    Oregon state needs to just let the FFL's contact FBI directly on the free NICS line. I've bought long guns in Oregin from FFL (still legal) and we've waited as much as 45 minutes AFTER the OSP system picked up the call. All they do is middle the call to NICS, for whicdh they are not charged any fee. Let the FFL's make that call.

    (WA FFL sales, long and short, ALL go to the NICS, not local. Non permit holders have to wait for a proceed from the local LEA, then come back and get the handgun later. CPL holders, the form gets filled out, but the NICS check is all that is required. Dealer then sends handgun purchase record form to local LEA, and State Department of Licensing, both of which keep permanent record. I;m also told (by OR FFL's) that all gun prichases through FFL's are maintained in a permanent record by OSP... a needless expense, and probably illegal. NICS are supposed to destroy all record of the call within 48 hours if a proceed code is given.

    OSP are merely wanting to generate more revenue..... for less service. take those phone operators offline, let NICS take care of it, and rejoin the rest of the union. Stupid thinking. Part of why I won't live there (he says, still lving here inn Washington)

  5. #25
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    241

    Default

    I'm ok with it.... when is that last time the fees have been raised since program inception? From the looks of it, a looooooong time. I'd be ok paying $28 for the background check...

  6. #26
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Central Oregon
    Posts
    2,026

    Default

    I still think it should be a free service. When I was in Colorado, we entered the information into a computer. The system let us know how long it would take. The customer was free to leave and come back. If he was a felon, there was usually LEO's waiting when they came back. It cost NOTHING!!

  7. #27
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Central Oregon
    Posts
    104

    Default

    The Feds will do it for free, this is just another TAX levied by the State of Oregon.

  8. #28
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Not Portland, But you can piss on it from here.
    Posts
    801

    Default

    Retailers are required to keep records of their sales I believe. It really doesnt matter if the state keeps them or not as they can just go to the retailer for the information.
    Back in the day when I was working a gun counter we would be audited from time to time and part of that audit was always a look at that record. The company had years of record books stored up.

  9. #29
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Battle Ground
    Posts
    1,710

    Default

    Well just think if your little fees get passed and you want to buy a rifle you come to WA and pay NOTHING!!!!!!!!!!!!! Where WA either pay a tax or a small OSP tax. So I would not complain as you get the best of both worlds. That is a small fee for you to pay so I would be happy instead of complaining. I think WA is stupid as well for not making OR residents not paying tax. But hey not everybody can be satisfied.

  10. #30
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Newberg
    Posts
    1,154

    Default

    there is a Bill in Congress right now write to them and try to stop it...
    Last edited by pokerace; 02-10-2011 at 03:49 PM. Reason: spelling

  11. #31
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    592

    Default

    I'm ok with it.... when is that last time the fees have been raised since program inception? From the looks of it, a looooooong time. I'd be ok paying $28 for the background check...
    That's a 280% increase, for something that can be done for free at the federal NICS. Heck some states don't even require a background check if the buyer has a CHL.

  12. #32
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Rural OR, South of Dallas
    Posts
    330

    Default

    Make the Feds pay for it. If they don't, they state won't require a BG check.

  13. #33
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Wilsonville, Oregon, United States
    Posts
    96

    Default

    An update for everyone, there are two bills right now travelling through the legislature which would allow FFLs to go directly to NICS for background checks and not use OSP as the POC for this. Also, FBI/NICS doesn't charge.
    HB2791
    SB934
    If you feel this is the right thing to do please contat your elected officials and let them know!
    http://oregonfirearms.org/pdfs/backgroundfactsheet.pdf

  14. #34
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Wilsonville, Oregon, United States
    Posts
    96

    Default

    As you all have figured out by now the otion to raise OSP background check fees did not pass. YAY!
    A BIG thank you to Kevin Starrett for all the work he does for us clarifying confusing bills and fighting for gun rights.

    Just though I'd throw this out there... this morning I ran background check and my approval number was 11-115300. This is how many approvals the OSP have given this year, @ $10 each. That doesn't include online checks that are now available and over the 8,000 mark.

    Just interesting!

  15. #35
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Oregon - Wet Side
    Posts
    216

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jeddedia View Post
    Well from what I know the OSP is supposed to purge the records after 30 days (?), but that doesn't mean the information is lost and gone forever. I'm sure that the feds or some other watchdog program is keeping track of EVERYTHING that goes on with serial numbers and who buys what.
    They keep it all.

    An FFL holder told me the state helped them with some compliance issues on gun sales from years ago that came up in an audit. It sounded like they lost some sales records and the state was able to provide everything they needed very quickly.

    If you bought it in Oregon I would consider it registered.

  16. #36
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Albany, Oregon
    Posts
    387

    Default

    Nothing but a tax (fee). They should not be allowed to even collect the $10. We don't need the service being provided.

    T_H
    skydiver and chariot13 like this.

  17. #37
    Senior Member skydiver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Gresham, OR
    Posts
    944

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Teufel_Hunden View Post
    Nothing but a tax (fee). They should not be allowed to even collect the $10. We don't need the service being provided.
    +1 agreed!

  18. #38
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    OR
    Posts
    2,171

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jeddedia View Post
    As you all have figured out by now the otion to raise OSP background check fees did not pass. YAY!
    A BIG thank you to Kevin Starrett for all the work he does for us clarifying confusing bills and fighting for gun rights.
    Unfortunately, the state didn't get out of the business entirely. I guess it's because we're Oregon and we have to be special.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

  1. Background check fee increase
    By jonnysportr in forum Legal and Political
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 05-24-2010, 04:26 PM
  2. Can I raise stock 10/22 sights 1/2 inch?
    By teflon97239 in forum Firearm Gear and Accessories
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 05-22-2010, 01:12 AM
  3. OSP Checks
    By branchbuster in forum Legal and Political
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 05-18-2010, 07:05 PM
  4. POI (raise or lower rear sight)?
    By Starship in forum Handgun Discussion
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 12-15-2009, 02:32 PM
  5. OSP Gun Registration Archive Question
    By Grizzly_A in forum General Firearm Discussion
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 08-20-2009, 08:04 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •