Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 28 of 28

Thread: My new Taurus Judge

  1. #21
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    NW Oregon
    Posts
    1,996

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by wired View Post
    Id take 6 rounds of even moderately loaded .45 colt at 600 ft lbs over a whole box full of 9mm and the revolver won't jam on you.
    i can most likely put 5-6+ rounds a +p 124gr golddot into the A zone in the same amount of time it takes you to put 2 there with a judge loaded with 45govt.

    and a 2nd or 3rd gen 9mm glock doesn't "jam." my personal experience with revolvers is that they most certainly can, and do, malfunction. taurus revolvers are particularly unreliable. modern revolvers are extremely complex mechanical devices with a small pile of little delicate parts and springs. have you ever pulled the side plate off a modern revolver?

    a glock 17 consists of 34 individual parts.. most smith revolvers contain well over 100 tiny little fragile parts, that all have to work in perfect synchronization to fire the weapon.

    this is a drill we run in my training group to simulate a straight-up no-bubblegum shootout against an armed assailant, with forced reload.
    YouTube - August 1 CRPC - Head 2 Head - Alex y Evil Ben again

    try that with any revolver, regardless of caliber.

  2. #22
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    fidalgo island
    Posts
    506

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bkb0000 View Post
    the archduke was shot with a .380

    That has to be wrong, I read over and over on the internet that the .380 can not kill any one.

  3. #23
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    NW Oregon
    Posts
    1,996

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gehrheart View Post
    That has to be wrong, I read over and over on the internet that the .380 can not kill any one.
    .380s are too weak to reliably penetrate deep enough to ensure vital area damage. fired into the skull, or fired perpendicularly at the heart, even a .22lr will kill. but either fired at the torso into the side, or at an angle, or even perpendicularly but through heavy clothing, or even into a large man, may very well not penetrate deep enough to take out the heart/major blood vessels, failing to incapacitate.

    can they incapacitate? surely.. but are they as likely to incapacitate as 9mm/40/45? no.

  4. #24
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    The Dalles in a penthouse
    Posts
    459

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bkb0000 View Post
    i can most likely put 5-6+ rounds a +p 124gr golddot into the A zone in the same amount of time it takes you to put 2 there with a judge loaded with 45govt.

    and a 2nd or 3rd gen 9mm glock doesn't "jam." my personal experience with revolvers is that they most certainly can, and do, malfunction. taurus revolvers are particularly unreliable. modern revolvers are extremely complex mechanical devices with a small pile of little delicate parts and springs. have you ever pulled the side plate off a modern revolver?

    a glock 17 consists of 34 individual parts.. most smith revolvers contain well over 100 tiny little fragile parts, that all have to work in perfect synchronization to fire the weapon.

    this is a drill we run in my training group to simulate a straight-up no-bubblegum shootout against an armed assailant, with forced reload.
    YouTube - August 1 CRPC - Head 2 Head - Alex y Evil Ben again

    try that with any revolver, regardless of caliber.

    Why would I need to do that? One shot of 300 grain .45 caliber lead going 1200 FPS at center mass and I'm relatively sure I can sit back and wait for the cops to show up. Why make all that extra noise?

    Ive never had a revolver malfunction. I cannot say that of semiautomatic pistols.

  5. #25
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    NW Oregon
    Posts
    1,996

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by wired View Post
    Why would I need to do that? One shot of 300 grain .45 caliber lead going 1200 FPS at center mass and I'm relatively sure I can sit back and wait for the cops to show up. Why make all that extra noise?

    Ive never had a revolver malfunction. I cannot say that of semiautomatic pistols.
    i'd suggest reading up on terminal ballistics.. i'd also suggest spending a little more time shooting on a dynamic range- even the pros can MISS when under stress. your followup shots are not any faster because the round didn't strike meat.

  6. #26
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    The Dalles in a penthouse
    Posts
    459

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bkb0000 View Post
    i'd suggest reading up on terminal ballistics.. i'd also suggest spending a little more time shooting on a dynamic range- even the pros can MISS when under stress. your followup shots are not any faster because the round didn't strike meat.
    My carry gun is a redhawk 4 inch .45 colt with buffalo bore 325 grain lead flying at 1260 fps by my chrono. I can get 6 shots on target in 3-4 seconds firing double action. I don't feel undergunned but after dumping a full cylinder in 3 seconds I need a break. Some people like pistols and some prefer revolvers but given the choice between a magnum level round and a 9mm I'll take the heavy magnum any day.

  7. #27
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    fidalgo island
    Posts
    506

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bkb0000 View Post
    .380s are too weak to reliably penetrate deep enough to ensure vital area damage. fired into the skull, or fired perpendicularly at the heart, even a .22lr will kill. but either fired at the torso into the side, or at an angle, or even perpendicularly but through heavy clothing, or even into a large man, may very well not penetrate deep enough to take out the heart/major blood vessels, failing to incapacitate.

    can they incapacitate? surely.. but are they as likely to incapacitate as 9mm/40/45? no.
    I hope you did catch the fact I was only trying to make a funny.

  8. #28
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    NW Oregon
    Posts
    1,996

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gehrheart View Post
    I hope you did catch the fact I was only trying to make a funny.
    i thought you were trying to make a funny point.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •