Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 26
Like Tree5Likes

Thread: Form over Function PX4

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Hillsboro, OR
    Posts
    70

    Default Form over Function PX4

    I've seen alot of talk about the PX4 storm. Seems people really like the way it handles. Seems like it is a damn solid shooter that a guy would be blessed to carry into battle. What I don't hear about too often is that its a pig nose fugly gun. Now maybe Im the only one that thinks this about the gun. After all not everyone's taste is the same as mine. However the point Id like to make is this; I've got a bug, or really more like a disease. An obsession of things made out of steel with fine shapes and lines that appeal to my eye, whether it be firearms, knives, or automobiles. A prius is a damn fine auto but its lines aren't beautiful to me so Id never own one. This idea also carries over to firearms. I may never buy a PX4 regardless of how fine it shoots. Am I wrong here? Isn't that the reason we buy so many firearms. We only need one to defend the fort. So why do I have a dozen or more? Did I buy them because they are all great shooters? Or did I buy them because I love the beautiful lines? Sorry px4 guys. Im not trying to pick on you. I don't know how beretta went from the beautiful 92 to that. The added barrel length of the SD model I actually might like but I haven't seen one in person.


  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    clackamas county
    Posts
    213

    Default

    When the PX4 compact came out I totally fell in love with the feel in my hand but I was looking for a CC gun and it was pretty heavy steel for the size. Still would like to add the compact to my "pile" . I agree that the full size model is fugly but for some reason the compact model I find sexy even though it's just a bit smaller barrel length.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Troutdale or nowhere near 82nd and Flavel
    Posts
    716

    Default

    The full size models are a bit on the odd looking side but i used to feel the same way about the glocks too. then i got own one and fell in love with the way it looks. So people do come around on the form. I am a huge fan on the 92 and i am still not sure on the new direction but i guess every maker needs to have a flag ship polymer gun to stand behind now. I think the reason most people are put off by the px4 is the cosmetic design that beretta threw on the frame.

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Jefferson Co
    Posts
    75

    Default

    Looks good, feels good, shoots good.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Sunny Eastern Washington
    Posts
    188

    Default

    I've never bought a semi-auto for its looks...to me they're all ugly tools. I did buy a S&W Model 27 with a 3 1/2" barrel for its looks though and it is still one of the best looking revolvers out there......It's just plain beautiful!

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    315

    Default

    At least it isn't as ugly as a Glock.
    ripcity likes this.

  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Hillsboro, OR
    Posts
    70

    Default

    The glocks beauty is in its simplicity. A brick with a trigger. All of these companies that "need a polymere gun to stand behind"; it all started with glock right? If not for glock we probable wouldnt have your M&Ps and your XDs.


  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    315

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Smiddy View Post

    The guy holding the Glock in that picture forgot to install the correct sights for it.

    FarmerTed1971 likes this.

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Vancouver, WA
    Posts
    570

    Default

    Now that's funny!

  10. #10
    Senior Member Burt Gummer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Lake Oswego
    Posts
    1,682

    Default

    Dammit the website is a fake. I had my CC out ready to go!
    civilian75 likes this.
    Osprey 45 (pending), Sparrow (Pending), Mystic (pending), AAC SDN6 (pending), AAC m4-2000 (pending); no money for groceries pending.

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    between springfield and shelbyville
    Posts
    1,213

    Default

    I actually like the way the px4 looks, but I like the way it shoots even more.

  12. #12
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    columbia river
    Posts
    4

    Default

    So I got "talked" in to getting a px4 storm compact for the old lady, she was using her Kimber ultra carry II with laser grip's but she wanted to try a something 9mm. It's not that she didn't like the kimber! She like's to change her gun's more then I change my sock's!!! Before we "I" put down $1500+ for a kimber ultra CDP w/laser grip's in 9mm (I have the .45 CDP) we looked around the house at my Glock,springfield,para,colt, S&W ect...ect. A Beretta pistol just might need to be in the line up. A friend let us try his px4 9mm out, after 500+ rounds I was sold! So we have one Now, hell I even think the little pistol is kinda cute! LOL But make no mistake it's a lot nicer to look at then a glock and has a lot more feature's. Great gun, good price and I can buy lot's of ammo with the $1000 saved
    Last edited by Capt Dan; 12-31-2011 at 12:47 PM. Reason: I was tired and missspelled half the word's, on a boat for 30hrs

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    105

    Default

    I buy for looks first feel second. so far I got good a bunch of good looking guns that shoot a OK.

  14. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Flicking A Switch To Open My Third Eye
    Posts
    212

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Smiddy View Post
    The glocks beauty is in its simplicity. A brick with a trigger. All of these companies that "need a polymere gun to stand behind"; it all started with glock right? If not for glock we probable wouldnt have your M&Ps and your XDs.
    You need to google "HK VP70." Glock popularized polymer pistol frames, they didn't come anywhere close to inventing them.

    As far as form versus function, you sound as if you've never laid eyes on a Glock. They're ugly. Say what you will about the PX4, but there is a flow to its lines that is simply missing on the humpbacked and finger bump festooned plastic brick. Slick slide a PX4 like a Glock and it looks way better than the Austrian eyesore.



    Then again, some vision impaired folks gave Sarah Jessica Parker a movie and television career despite her being a short, unshapely, big nosed, and horse faced woman. It's entirely possible there are in fact people out there who think Glocks are beautiful. If so, they are the SJP fans of the shooting world.
    civilian75 likes this.

  15. #15
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Rainier, OR
    Posts
    85

    Default

    I like the PX4 looks. I also liked the way it felt in my hand. But I've always favored the unusual.

    I also agree the Glock is an ugly brick. I had to sell mine because I kept forgetting if I was supposed to shoot at something or throw it through a window.

  16. #16
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Beaverton
    Posts
    85

    Default

    Yah glocks are fugly. I have the PX4 and the 92FS Inox. The PX4 is the most accurate gun I have shot. And I have shot a lot of pistols. Yah the looks are not the greatest to most. I think the guns lines are sweet. But that's me. The performance far out weighs the looks. I think the PX4 out performs most $800 pistols. I should know. My wife has a H&K P30 and I have the 92FS Inox. Hands down the PX4...
    Just my opinion.

  17. #17
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Bainbridge island, Washington
    Posts
    7

    Default

    I dont really like how it looks. I like a more classic and simple look. I havnt shot a px4 yet but i held a couple and they were very comfortable. Im tossing around the idea of buying 1.

  18. #18
    Sr. Member civilian75's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Hillsboro, OR
    Posts
    645

    Default

    By the way, all three sizes (full size, compact and sub-compact) in 9mm or 40S&W going for $440 at CDNN for don't know how long. Check page 8
    Every citizen should be a soldier. This was the case with the Greeks and Romans, and must be that of every free state. Thomas Jefferson

  19. #19
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    between springfield and shelbyville
    Posts
    1,213

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fireblade View Post
    Im tossing around the idea of buying 1.
    fireblade likes this.

  20. #20
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Scholls, OR
    Posts
    200

    Default

    I love glocks, but they're fugly. The PX4 is fugly also. In fact - there's few polymer pistols that aren't fugly (the Sig Pro 2022 is the first I've seen that aren't entirely fugly, but they're not beautiful either). I buy Glocks because of the function. If the PX4 functions well - it's worth getting, even if looks like a sack full of bung holes.

    Some guns shouldn't be duplicated in polymer either - I have yet to see a plastic framed 1911 that doesn't cause my stomach to churn.

    If'n ya likes how they shoot, get one. Kind of like being with a fat or ugly partner - beauty is just a light switch or closed pair of eyes away so long as it feels good.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •