
Originally Posted by
BillyDa59
Tangent, I really hope you're not meaning to say that Starbucks staged this in order to seem reasonable in banning guns from their stores. No disrespect intended, but the idea that a big name company would endanger customers to achieve such a petty goal seems a bit tinfoil hat to me. The risk/reward factor is just way too high there.
As a side note, I hate how the news outlets stated "According to police records, she hasn't had any formal firearms training." As if FORMAL training should be a necessity to even think of using a gun.
Maybe I'm becoming a little crazy myself, but it seems to me that this is how major misconceptions about gun ownership and use come about; the media thumps an absurd and untrue idea around a bunch via inference, and suddenly this idea is so common-place that it's become something that most people believe is actually a law.
Case-in-point: My uncle told me the other day, "I'd love to have a gun, but I don't have license to own one yet." This, and about half a year ago I had to convince my friend that he didn't need a concealed weapons license to carry an unloaded rifle in his trunk.
Sorry if all this seems like I'm just lamenting and ranting. It's been a long day.
Bookmarks