Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Interesting read for people who CCW

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    vancouver, wa
    Posts
    578

    Default Interesting read for people who CCW

    I found this on another site and thought it was an extremely interesting read.

    http://www.armedcitizensnetwork.org/...ork_2010-9.pdf

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    My house
    Posts
    710

    Default

    Nice find. Worth the read.

    -d

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Portland
    Posts
    157

    Default

    Long, but well worth reading. It presents a dose of reality that we should all think about.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Vancouver, WA
    Posts
    296

    Default

    That prosecutor and any detectives who ignored physical evidence in favor of statements from the attackers should be fired.

    We're not talking about a hair with DNA that was missed here. We're talking about the attackers blatantly lying about where the events transpired, and physical evidence that was crystal clear in showing that.

    IMO that's an absolute dereliction of duty and a complete waste of tax payer money.

  5. #5
    sed
    sed is offline
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Portland area
    Posts
    31

    Default Thanks

    Good read. Thank you for sharing.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Hillsboro, OR
    Posts
    337

    Default

    A good reminder for folks to remember how quickly a simple neighborhood tiff can turn violent.

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Battle Ground WA
    Posts
    253

    Default

    Why were the attackers not charged with anything?

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Snohomish County
    Posts
    180

    Default

    Question for any members with legal expertise: how would this play in WA State?
    A) In the Peoples' Republic of Seattle & Environs (North San Francisco/Santa Monica)?
    and
    B) In the part of the state located in Free America? (That part identifying socially and politically with rest of the Western USA)?
    c.) If one is obviously physically inferior to the combined might of the assailants? e.g. age >60, orthopedic injuries, etc?
    D.) How much does the law requiring the State to cover legal expenses in a finding of self-defense restrain the malicious prosecutions? I have seen people walk in situations that totally astounded me (assuming there was any resemblance between what the public is told and what happened) but I sure wouldn't depend on that phenomenon saving me. One example was the man who spent the night in a non-abode property he owned after a burglary or 2. When the thief returned the property owner pulled a pump shotgun and the burglar took off (accomplice outside). The property owner shot the thief in the gluteus as he fled and was stupid enough to say he shot to scare him. No charges were filed even after such a breathtaking paroxysm in astounding stupidity in (a.) shooting the fleeing goblin (b) admitting in shooting to scare, which is also admitting that he didn't feel like he was threatened with being killed or maimed. (Actually it would fly in TX where it's legal to shoot a thief on your property after dark.)
    .
    Poster has several NRA instructor certs, training at FAS & Insights, carries regularly, is polite and cordial to all. Too old to fight, too fat to run.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •