Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 24

Thread: U.S. Army Unveils 'Revolutionary' XM25 Rifle in Afghanistan

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Conyers, Georgia, United States
    Posts
    65

    Default U.S. Army Unveils 'Revolutionary' XM25 Rifle in Afghanistan

    Nice!

    Only 12,000??? Shouldn't every soldier have this in tow??

    U.S. Army Unveils 'Revolutionary' XM25 Rifle in Afghanistan - FoxNews.com

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    between springfield and shelbyville
    Posts
    1,212

    Default

    I think it's a good specialized weapon, but with it's large size, low round count, and explosive shells, I think it'd be a horrible weapon for engagements within ~50 yards.

    Most squads will probably have one, but I dont think it'd be a good weapon for every soldier to have.

  3. #3
    Senior Member Gunfixx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    The giant metropolis of Port Hadlock & Chimacum, WA
    Posts
    883

    Default

    I hear they got the idea of a bad guy chasing, exploding bullet from these guys


  4. #4
    Senior Member Gunfixx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    The giant metropolis of Port Hadlock & Chimacum, WA
    Posts
    883

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MrNiceGuy View Post
    I think it's a good specialized weapon, but with it's large size, low round count, and explosive shells, I think it'd be a horrible weapon for engagements within ~50 yards.

    Most squads will probably have one, but I dont think it'd be a good weapon for every soldier to have.
    They are a task specific weapon that are not to be carried by every soldier.
    Like an M-60 etc.

    Nonetheless, it is an incredible weapon!

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Sweet Home Oregon
    Posts
    882

    Default

    Not sure I would want to carry the extra weight in combat

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Vancouver, WA
    Posts
    570

    Default

    I'll bet the price per round is also 'Revolutionary.' That is fine with me if it works as described.

  7. #7
    Senior Member Gunfixx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    The giant metropolis of Port Hadlock & Chimacum, WA
    Posts
    883

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ogre View Post
    I'll bet the price per round is also 'Revolutionary.' That is fine with me if it works as described.
    Pre mass production cost is around $25.00. (so I've heard)

    I'll stick with 223 re-loads

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Sherwood Forest
    Posts
    1,383

    Default

    THANK YOU for the info..

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Portland, Oregon
    Posts
    1,658

    Default

    "is so sophisticated that soldiers are proficient users literally within minutes."

    O.k.... I would think something SOOOO sophisticated would take more then a few mere minutes to figure it out.

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Portland, Oregon
    Posts
    1,658

    Default

    "Once the trigger is pulled and the round leaves the barrel, a computer chip inside the projectile communicates exactly how far it has traveled, allowing for precise detonation behind or ahead of any target."

    I wonder how much those rounds cost? A few hundred per round?

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Portland, Oregon
    Posts
    1,658

    Default

    Some more information and a better view of a Camo XM25 Rifle!

    http://kitup.military.com/2010/02/th...-take-two.html

  12. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    eugene, or-gun
    Posts
    321

    Default

    Hey, they already made these back in 1997. I saw them at the movies. STARSHIP TROOPERS.
    famous quote;; your some kinda of big fat smart bug arent you.

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Oregon City, Oregon
    Posts
    1,324

    Default

    I do not think it is a game changer but more like a smart M203. I can bet you that it will be considered an indirect fire weapon and require approval under the rules of engagement as such. If you just want to kill someone behind a wall or window, an AT4 or SMAW would get the job done better.

    The first time its used and some "civilians" get hurt it will require approval from higher to be used thereby eliminating the quick reaction advantage they built it for.

  14. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Vancouver, WA
    Posts
    914

    Default

    I think that's a great gun, but only need one per unit or fighting group. Not a CQB weapon. Also can you imagine the legal problems this will give to the soldiers who use it and kill "innocent" terrorist.

  15. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Hillsboro
    Posts
    311

    Default

    Looks like a decent weapon, but the quotes were laughable. I don't think it's "revolutionary" or "game changing". Its just an advanced m203 of sorts. That article made it sound like the weapon was delivered by Jesus himself.

  16. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Originally from the central midwest but have relocated to pdx several years ago.
    Posts
    369

    Default

    I vaguely recall seeing what must've been prototype versions of this at ft. sill back around '96 or so during some 'future arms' presentation. iirc they called it the "oiw", and had crew served variants called the "ociw" pr something like that...o's & w's anyway (don't remember what the acronyms stood for). hmm maybe it was something a bit different as I think those versions were a rifle and a smart gren launcher.. either way, the sales hype was pretty similar. It sure would be crap if every G.I. was stuck with one of these, but it would make a great special weapon, say one per squad or something along those lines...like a smart mortar or 203....I just never warmed up to the idea of an individual weapon having onboard electronics....murphy loves electronics...but time will tell...it does look promising

  17. #17
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Southern Oregon Coast
    Posts
    42

    Default

    Seems the laser range-finding is nothing new, just the wireless comms in the round to talk back to the computer so it goes boom at the right time. Can't be too long before a scope-maker teams up with Barrett to make the round talk to the laser scope outside of Military development. (Kinda like the onboard computer built into the scopes of some of the .223 and .338 lapua sniper rifles we've been reading about to calc windage, etc.)

    Rules of engagement be damned... if a dirtbag is shooting at any soldier of the US, I'm all for anything new that goes boom and kills the dirtbags deader.

    -Case

  18. #18
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Longview, WA
    Posts
    144

    Default

    WTF is this? : | that is the most ridiculous looking weapon ever.. like it was designed by preschool girls

  19. #19
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    between springfield and shelbyville
    Posts
    1,212

    Default

    It does look like a b@stardized super soaker, and that laser/scope thing looks straight out of 1979....

    I think it's a great idea that we can make work with our level of technology, but it's not streamlined. Wait another 30 years and you'll see weapons with the same capability in a much smaller and more efficient package.

  20. #20
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Central Oregon
    Posts
    2,025

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gunfixx View Post
    I hear they got the idea of a bad guy chasing, exploding bullet from these guys

    Excellent "Who's Framing Roger Rabbit" reference...

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •