ACTION ALERT: OREGON SENATE SET TO VOTE ON BACKGROUND CHECKS
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 43
  1. #1
    Senior Member Bazooka Joe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Lower Yakima Valley
    Posts
    209

    Default WA transfers now subject to sales tax

    The Washington Dept. of Revenue has determined that interstate transfers of firearms are subject to tax and the dealer must collect the tax from the buyer.

    Is the transfer of a firearm subject to sales tax?

    In an interstate transfer of firearms the Washington gun dealer is required to collect retail sales tax from the Washington resident on the purchase price of the firearm. The retail sales tax is collected from the Washington customer at the time the customer takes possession of the firearm. Sales tax is collected on the total selling price, including freight and/or delivery charges and other amounts added, such a an amount for insurance coverage.

    If the selling price is not evident, it is up to the gun dealer to obtain this price by either requiring the purchaser to show the purchase price or to obtain that information from the out-of-state dealer. If, for whatever reason, the dealer is still unable to obtain the original purchase price, RCW 82.08.010 provides that the fair market value shall be used. It is the responsibility of the Washington gun dealer to determine the price in order to report and pay the sales tax due.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Hillsboro, OR
    Posts
    3,955

    Default

    Well that sucks, but I'm not surprised. Gotta pay for all those entitlement programs.

  3. #3
    Modaholic Dyjital's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Corvallis, Oregon, United States
    Posts
    1,292

    Default

    I wonder if that will lower the legal transfers?

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Milwaukie
    Posts
    787

    Default

    If the firearm is obtained by gift, the instate dealer is obligated to collect use tax on the fair market value of the firearm, unless the receiving person can document that the prior owner had paid retail sales or use tax on the firearm
    What am I missing?

    Sales tax on a gift just because it has to be transferred?

    By that logic should a WA resident I sent a Christmas present to have to pay tax on it?

  5. #5
    Modaholic Dyjital's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Corvallis, Oregon, United States
    Posts
    1,292

    Default

    I find no hole in your logic. Would assume that it's correct. Unless firearm owners are being singled out.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    sw wa
    Posts
    318

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dyjital View Post
    I wonder if that will lower the legal transfers?

    Ya think

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Hillsboro, OR
    Posts
    3,955

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dyjital View Post
    I find no hole in your logic. Would assume that it's correct. Unless firearm owners are being singled out.
    I doubt seriously this is a firearms issue. This is a revenue issue. WA state in a down economy is looking for revenue anywhere it can get it to fund it's social welfare and entitlement programs. Look for other fee and "revenue enhancement" programs to come down the pike.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Sweet Home, Oregon, United States
    Posts
    738

    Default

    Is Oregon next?

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Eugene/PDX
    Posts
    1,134

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dan-Dee Sales, Inc View Post
    Is Oregon next?
    Some of the left-wing dems here want a sales tax, but a majority of the party is pretty tepid about it. Kicker "reform" is the next big target.

    We're most likely going to continue seeing big increases in government fees and reductions in service.

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Renton, WA
    Posts
    243

    Default Date of effectivitity?

    My understanding of this is that it is a change in the law per House Bill 1597 and does not become effective until July 1, 2010.

    Does anyone know if I am correct or what? Some FFLs are collecting the tax now and some are not. Does anyone know the true story?

    enjr4

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Vancouver, WA
    Posts
    3,944

    Default They've been

    Quote Originally Posted by Bazooka Joe View Post
    The Washington Dept. of Revenue has determined that interstate transfers of firearms are subject to tax and the dealer must collect the tax from the buyer.
    doing it for years now, just that your FFL is now following the law.

  12. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Vancouver, WA
    Posts
    3,944

    Default Well.

    Quote Originally Posted by Unka-Boo View Post
    What am I missing?

    Sales tax on a gift just because it has to be transferred?

    By that logic should a WA resident I sent a Christmas present to have to pay tax on it?
    it is the law and has been for many, many years. If I drive to Portland and buy a washer/dryer and have it delivered I have to pay use/sales tax on it even though the purchase was in OR. If I pick the units up in OR and transport them myself I SUPPOSED to go to the Dept of Revenue and pay the WA use tax on them. You're supposed to do that for EVERYTHING purchased out of state (other than food). Been that way for YEARS and YEARS now but most people don't know it so it's largely ignored.

    A few years ago WA state sent agents to watch people loading their cars/trucks in OR, they then radioed the info to waiting State Troopers who then stopped the vehicles and levied fines for not paying the sales tax!

    Guess most people missed that, I've been around enough years to remember them, plus my father (as did I) worked for the State of WA.

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Vancouver, WA
    Posts
    3,944

    Default NO, they're

    Quote Originally Posted by enjr4 View Post
    My understanding of this is that it is a change in the law per House Bill 1597 and does not become effective until July 1, 2010.

    Does anyone know if I am correct or what? Some FFLs are collecting the tax now and some are not. Does anyone know the true story?

    enjr4
    supposed to have been doing it for years now. My FFL has been doing it for years now also.

  14. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Sweet Home, Oregon, United States
    Posts
    738

    Default

    what about internet items? sales tax or use tax?

  15. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Vancouver, WA
    Posts
    3,944

    Default If you have

    Quote Originally Posted by Dan-Dee Sales, Inc View Post
    what about internet items? sales tax or use tax?
    a "nexus" (storefront, office, warehouse or storage) in WA then , yes, you must collect sales/use tax from any WA resident.

  16. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Milwaukie
    Posts
    787

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by deen_ad View Post
    it is the law and has been for many, many years. If I drive to Portland and buy a washer/dryer and have it delivered I have to pay use/sales tax on it even though the purchase was in OR. If I pick the units up in OR and transport them myself I SUPPOSED to go to the Dept of Revenue and pay the WA use tax on them. You're supposed to do that for EVERYTHING purchased out of state (other than food). Been that way for YEARS and YEARS now but most people don't know it so it's largely ignored.

    A few years ago WA state sent agents to watch people loading their cars/trucks in OR, they then radioed the info to waiting State Troopers who then stopped the vehicles and levied fines for not paying the sales tax!

    Guess most people missed that, I've been around enough years to remember them, plus my father (as did I) worked for the State of WA.
    I know it's supposed to work that way on purchased items, I was curious about gifts.

  17. #17
    Ryo
    Ryo is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    128

    Default

    I believe I read somewhere if you do a transfer and the owner of the firearm can show that they paid taxes on it already, they don't charge for the WA tax. Am I correct about that?

  18. #18
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Benton County, Washington
    Posts
    1,973

    Default

    They gotta find ways to raise taxes somehow...soon there will be new traffic laws that will make the cell phone laws look conservative.

  19. #19
    Senior Member Gunfixx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    The giant metropolis of Port Hadlock & Chimacum, WA
    Posts
    1,535

    Default

    It's going to be challenged in court.
    1. FFL's are being singled out and expected to be Tax Enforcement Agents of The State. I'm told that this is not lawful. The law (actually it is just currently a "rule") is not being applied/enforced equally on all retailer/vendors, and that is against the law. The law (rule) cannot be sellectively enforced.
    2. How does one lawfully collect sales tax on an item one does not sell? So, if anything at all it is a use tax only issue.

    What my fear is, is that FFL's will just kneel in subjection to The State and act as Tax Enforcement Agents for The State rather than collectively fight this bogus unlawful act by The State. In fact many are already on bended knee and doing the will of The State before even getting involved in the fight.

    Contact NSSF, contact the NRA, and contact your Republican (or reasonable thinking Democrat) Congressman, and let them know about this unjust act by The State.
    www.northwestgunrefinishing.com Cerakote Applicator
    Patron Life Member NRA
    Member National Shooting Sports Foundation
    OathKeepers Associate Member
    Jefferson County Sportsman

  20. #20
    Ryo
    Ryo is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    128

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gunfixx View Post
    It's going to be challenged in court.
    1. FFL's are being singled out and expected to be Tax Enforcement Agents of The State. I'm told that this is not lawful. The law (actually it is just currently a "rule") is not being applied/enforced equally on all retailer/vendors, and that is against the law. The law (rule) cannot be sellectively enforced.
    2. How does one lawfully collect sales tax on an item one does not sell? So, if anything at all it is a use tax only issue.

    What my fear is, is that FFL's will just kneel in subjection to The State and act as Tax Enforcement Agents for The State rather than collectively fight this bogus unlawful act by The State. In fact many are already on bended knee and doing the will of The State before even getting involved in the fight.

    Contact NSSF, contact the NRA, and contact your Republican (or reasonable thinking Democrat) Congressman, and let them know about this unjust act by The State.
    I certainly hope it gets challenged. It's unfair for the FFL dealer having to be the tax collector and monitor what people buy. So if you bought a used item, and taxes were paid for it.. it's double dipping.

    I'm starting to believe if I have a garage sale, they would be stopping by to pick up the taxes.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •